03.06.2015 Views

Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL

Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL

Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Picture 10. The games we play.<br />

The games may happen, <strong>and</strong> in fact are taking place, among any subjects – individuals, groups, or<br />

organizations. The basic principles are the same. To ensure the survival <strong>and</strong> success of the<br />

organization, a manager should control all the games that the organization plays with other<br />

organizations, with clients or partners in its environment, <strong>and</strong> which individuals in organizations<br />

play among themselves.<br />

Playing games is fun, but may cost a lot. The uncertainty <strong>and</strong> unpredictability of the future is<br />

always present. To be able to react to a new <strong>and</strong> unexpected change in circumstances any subject<br />

needs to be free of restrictions that playing games may impose on it. It needs to be free, <strong>and</strong> wants<br />

to be free, even more so in a less predictable or new environment. This is the instinct of freedom.<br />

To be your own master is very nice. However, when others are also free - from your influence – it<br />

is definitely risky. It does not allow control over their behaviour in a way that would bring better<br />

results to you. It does not even allow you to predict their behaviour <strong>and</strong> make your own<br />

corresponding choices. That is very risky. It is much better <strong>for</strong> anyone if he is free, but with others<br />

depending on him. That would be ideal. Many used to strive <strong>for</strong> this <strong>and</strong> still yearn <strong>for</strong> this.<br />

Total freedom <strong>for</strong> everyone is a disaster, because nobody takes others into account or coordinates<br />

his behaviour with others. At the end of the days, it very much complicates survival of an entity as<br />

a whole <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> every element taken individually.<br />

Total interdependence <strong>and</strong> inter-predictability is also bad, because stochastic nature is always<br />

present <strong>and</strong> its unpredictable moves may make a totally controlled arrangement absurd. The<br />

arrangement may need to be changed immediately, but not be able to do so. Once more, this is<br />

also bad <strong>for</strong> survival, both <strong>for</strong> the entity <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> everyone in it.<br />

Those who love freedom most of all are ‘heroes’, because they change the world. That is very<br />

romantic, providing there is somebody – a conservator who is able to keep the world in order. The<br />

latter is very practical. Both are needed. Heroes are needed <strong>for</strong> a while, when the time <strong>for</strong> change<br />

is approaching. Conservators are needed <strong>for</strong> the longer term, be<strong>for</strong>e the next change is inevitable.<br />

‘Heroes’ use their power to <strong>for</strong>ce others to change the given order. Conservators use their power<br />

to eliminate ‘heroes’ in order to keep things in order. This is a good example of co-operation.<br />

Nature is extremely inventive.<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!