03.06.2015 Views

Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL

Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL

Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

‘in<strong>for</strong>mation’ is a verb <strong>and</strong> means the specific process of interaction between organisms that allows<br />

them to jointly use their sensors <strong>and</strong> memories, thus increasing their chances <strong>for</strong> survival.<br />

And that is great. Now a usable experience of any member, imprinted in his picture of the world or<br />

‘mental map’ can be enhanced many times by the experience of other members of the community,<br />

if they are successful in communication.<br />

This multiplier process of exchanging in<strong>for</strong>mation in an organization may create a common<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation field or organizational mental map, <strong>and</strong> its size is larger than any particular individual<br />

map, which is limited by the content of only one memory.<br />

‘In<strong>for</strong>mation’ does not exist in nature as a certain substance. It is impossible to say whether a<br />

signal (taken as it is) carries any in<strong>for</strong>mation or not. It depends not only on the signal, but on the<br />

result of the interaction between two mental maps. If none of these maps has been changed – then<br />

no in<strong>for</strong>mation took place. The “signal” was merely noise.<br />

Quantity of in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

The result of an in<strong>for</strong>mation process may be estimated by the amount of uncertainty that was taken<br />

away. The uncertainty depends, in its turn, on a variety of possible situations, which should be<br />

distinguished as different. ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ – it is only one bit. ‘To be’ or ‘not to be’ – is also only one<br />

bit. But the label on a bottle of good old wine means a lot <strong>for</strong> those who underst<strong>and</strong>.<br />

The quantity of uncertainty that may be taken away by one signal is up to the in<strong>for</strong>mational<br />

capacity of the signal. It depends on how many signals exist in the applied system of coding, <strong>and</strong><br />

what is the probability of the appearance of each particular signal. The greater the variety of<br />

situations represented by the given range of signals the more uncertainty. No uncertainty is related<br />

to situations that always <strong>and</strong> definitely take place. The less probable a situation (<strong>and</strong> the<br />

appearance of its corresponding signals), the more uncertainty will be taken away when the signal<br />

comes.<br />

However, the amount of ‘in<strong>for</strong>mation‘ that a signal may carry (in<strong>for</strong>mational capacity) may not be<br />

the same as the amount actually transferred. The barrel may be big, but empty. It all depends if the<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation process took place, which is not always the case when just sending <strong>and</strong> receiving<br />

signals takes place. Consider reading an old newspaper without any real ‘news’ in it, or listening to<br />

a lecturer who says nothing but speaks <strong>for</strong> an hour, or a philharmonic orchestra that uses the huge<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mational potential of combined signals from hundreds of instruments – <strong>and</strong> does not produce<br />

any relevant feelings.<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!