03.06.2015 Views

Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL

Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL

Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 1.4 Structure <strong>and</strong> Procedures<br />

The author of this manual had never faced more ‘secret’ things in organizations than their<br />

structures. While the <strong>for</strong>mal construction of an organization is usually known (though not always),<br />

nobody knows how the components actually interrelate <strong>and</strong> interact. The charts of administrative<br />

subordination never give a correct picture even of subordination itself. The real balance of power<br />

<strong>and</strong> influence may be very different. Sometimes the charts reflect what bosses think about who<br />

should report to whom; sometimes even this is not the point.<br />

For many years my younger fellow consultants <strong>and</strong> I did an obligatory job in any organization<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e we designed an intervention <strong>for</strong> it. This job was describing structures. It required<br />

considerable time, but always justified itself. Our consultants usually conducted a lot of interviews,<br />

discussing with each member of the organization (or several representatives of each position if<br />

there were too many <strong>for</strong>mally in the same positions) what he or she was responsible <strong>for</strong>, <strong>and</strong> what<br />

his/her boss was responsible <strong>for</strong>, <strong>and</strong> what his/her subordinates, if any, were responsible <strong>for</strong>. We<br />

asked them to answer how it actually is, not what is written in any <strong>for</strong>mal instructions (which were<br />

often totally irrelevant <strong>and</strong> useless). Of course, the answers were never the same - sometimes to<br />

the extent that not a single point coincided between what the boss was thinking about<br />

responsibilities <strong>and</strong> powers of a subordinate <strong>and</strong> what the subordinate thought about their own<br />

responsibilities <strong>and</strong> powers. So, we used to draw two structures <strong>for</strong> any organization – the one that<br />

we’ve called ‘a view from the top’, <strong>and</strong> another one called ‘a view from the bottom’. Comparison of<br />

these two pictures always gave us very fruitful ideas, <strong>and</strong> allowed us to go straight to the most<br />

tangled <strong>and</strong> vulnerable things that should be sorted out first.<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!