03.06.2015 Views

Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL

Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL

Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

uying exp<strong>and</strong>ing memory of computers in response to the rising size of messages causing older<br />

messages to be deleted, training staff in new skills in response to changing products, etc.<br />

These measures look like more or less changing of organization itself – yes, it is true. But what<br />

remains? If we do not wish to permanently ‘solve the same problem’ caused by uncontrollable<br />

<strong>for</strong>ces <strong>and</strong> repetitively waste resources <strong>for</strong> this, then we may consider changing the organization in<br />

a way that it would maintain it in a zone of com<strong>for</strong>t in spite of the negative influence of given<br />

uncontrollable factors. As someone once said, “There is no such thing as bad weather, just bad<br />

clothes...”<br />

Management<br />

Elimination of objectionable deviations, or a correction of trajectory each time a need raises –<br />

monitoring <strong>and</strong> control –may be one of the director‘s most critical functions.<br />

Elimination of or compensation <strong>for</strong> systematic reasons <strong>for</strong> objectionable deviations –is<br />

another function, also called problem solving.<br />

Some directors never solve problems. Due to the limits of their ability or authority – they just try to<br />

keep things as they are, or punish someone when something goes wrong. We call such directors<br />

controllers. A controller acts within the limits of control, strictly in accordance with the instruction<br />

<strong>for</strong> each particular case, <strong>and</strong> must report to his/her authority if something goes out of control.<br />

He/she is responsible <strong>for</strong> his/her own operation, or <strong>for</strong> doing what must be done, <strong>for</strong> executing<br />

designated duties.<br />

A director, who solves problems, we will call manager. Because the verb manage means not just<br />

supervision, but ‘succeeding in being able to do something; to contrive to carry on despite<br />

difficulties; to be in charge (of), administer’ (Collins Dictionary <strong>and</strong> Thesaurus, 1991). It is a bit<br />

more than just to control. It means to undertake all feasible measures, which do not contradict the<br />

limits of authority, to ensure the situation is where it should be. The top manager is responsible <strong>for</strong><br />

the operation <strong>and</strong> development of the organization or <strong>for</strong> doing what is necessary to consider all<br />

possibilities or provide optimal utilization of all accessible resources.<br />

Managerial capacity<br />

The effectiveness of a manager depends on his/her ability to correctly define problems, find<br />

rational solutions <strong>for</strong> them, <strong>and</strong> optimally organize <strong>and</strong> implement all necessary actions to achieve<br />

desirable results. Effectiveness here is defined as the difference between what a manager brings<br />

to the organization <strong>and</strong> what he or she takes from it. The effectiveness may be positive when the<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!