03.06.2015 Views

Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL

Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL

Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

First of all, during the interviews with the highest officials of the municipality the auditor should<br />

check if any objective setting system exists. Even where the auditor can find a strategic plan of the<br />

municipality, objectives <strong>and</strong> targets set at the municipal <strong>and</strong> departmental level, it does not<br />

necessary mean that systematic approach is employed. There may be only an accidental set of<br />

separated activities, <strong>for</strong> which different departments or officials are responsible. The auditor should<br />

examine the principles of objective setting: if we have here a top-down approach, when objectives<br />

of the separate units are set according to the municipality level objectives or bottom-up approach<br />

when municipality level objectives are set by collecting suggestions of separate units. If the auditor<br />

finds that there is no general objective setting system, he should examine how it is assured that<br />

objectives of separate subdivisions are interrelated; correspond to common objectives <strong>and</strong> strategy<br />

of municipality. During interviews with the heads of departments <strong>and</strong> employees the auditor verifies<br />

this in<strong>for</strong>mation on the level of subdivisions.<br />

The auditor should not be tricked by the existence of <strong>for</strong>mal planning procedures <strong>and</strong> written plans<br />

of activities. If these are in place, the auditor should carefully examine <strong>for</strong> what purposes these<br />

plans were created. Plans may be created <strong>for</strong> daily or weekly control of routine activities of the<br />

department or single officer, but they may have nothing to do with implementation of specific<br />

objectives. Thus existence of some plans does not necessarily mean that it helps to achieve the<br />

goals of the organisation.<br />

Planning of daily activities by the employees is also interesting, but only as much as it is needed to<br />

examine if the work processes are carried out under controlled conditions.<br />

Responsibility <strong>and</strong> authority<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mation from<br />

questionnaires<br />

Examination of<br />

internal documents,<br />

which define<br />

responsibility,<br />

authority <strong>and</strong> duties<br />

OVERVIEW<br />

STAGE<br />

Examination, specification<br />

SURVEY<br />

STAGE<br />

Examination of the<br />

actual responsibility<br />

<strong>and</strong> subordination<br />

Diagram 4 Auditing procedure<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mation on responsibility <strong>and</strong> authority of the employees may be obtained by using:<br />

• Questionnaires;<br />

• Internal normative documents;<br />

• Interviews with the employees (see diagram 3).<br />

Questionnaires are distributed <strong>and</strong> interviews are planned with every employee or employees of<br />

certain departments (depending on the audit objectives).<br />

Questionnaires provide us with in<strong>for</strong>mation related to the duties of every employee <strong>and</strong> services<br />

provided by each department. However, the use of questionnaires might not be successful in every<br />

case. I.e. most of the employees of one state owned enterprise have rewritten their descriptions of<br />

183

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!