03.06.2015 Views

Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL

Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL

Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

But these changes would not happen simply because other possible patterns of the organization<br />

<strong>and</strong> its behaviour exist somewhere in reality or in somebody’s beautiful mind. These other patterns<br />

must be considered as relevant, realistic, <strong>and</strong> worth following. They must deserve following,<br />

particularly if the ef<strong>for</strong>ts required are not too great in comparison with the results that may be<br />

achieved (basic rationality).<br />

When a new way of organizing <strong>and</strong> behaviour requires new skills – the barriers may seem to be<br />

insurmountable <strong>and</strong> the final result not so attractive (‘the grape is immature, anyway’) - the new<br />

truth may be considered ‘good in theory’, but not worth following in practice. Thus, other boxes are<br />

related not to the mind, but to the h<strong>and</strong>s – people <strong>and</strong> organizations do not try to do what they<br />

cannot do, unless it is a matter of life <strong>and</strong> death. They tend to look <strong>for</strong> ways that they already know<br />

<strong>and</strong> use technologies <strong>and</strong> skills they already have.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e – the second step in managing organizational development is to exp<strong>and</strong> the base of<br />

available behaviours that involve corresponding technologies, organizational arrangements <strong>and</strong><br />

skills. In some cases, learning new skills may be a sufficient precondition <strong>for</strong> corresponding<br />

changes. Consciously or not, some people may think that how they do something is more<br />

convenient <strong>for</strong> them than any other way. But if their knowledge of options increases, their thinking<br />

may change. Very often nothing except new skills is needed <strong>for</strong> a change to happen. But it is not<br />

always so easy. Changing technologies may require considerable investment or cause a lot of<br />

expenditures <strong>and</strong> inconveniences. Changing the organizational arrangement may require<br />

implementing new procedures, <strong>for</strong>mal <strong>and</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mal structures, ways of interaction <strong>and</strong><br />

collaboration, etc. - a lot of headaches <strong>for</strong> the leadership <strong>and</strong> seemingly useless ef<strong>for</strong>ts <strong>for</strong> those<br />

in the organization who do not think these changes are absolutely necessary.<br />

Thus, the way that people live in organizations depends on many internal <strong>and</strong> external factors.<br />

Among these factors, there are three crucially important one – what they know, what they can do,<br />

<strong>and</strong> what they think about what they can do. All these factors may be addressed by the<br />

corresponding training interventions.<br />

151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!