Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL
Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL
Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
But these changes would not happen simply because other possible patterns of the organization<br />
<strong>and</strong> its behaviour exist somewhere in reality or in somebody’s beautiful mind. These other patterns<br />
must be considered as relevant, realistic, <strong>and</strong> worth following. They must deserve following,<br />
particularly if the ef<strong>for</strong>ts required are not too great in comparison with the results that may be<br />
achieved (basic rationality).<br />
When a new way of organizing <strong>and</strong> behaviour requires new skills – the barriers may seem to be<br />
insurmountable <strong>and</strong> the final result not so attractive (‘the grape is immature, anyway’) - the new<br />
truth may be considered ‘good in theory’, but not worth following in practice. Thus, other boxes are<br />
related not to the mind, but to the h<strong>and</strong>s – people <strong>and</strong> organizations do not try to do what they<br />
cannot do, unless it is a matter of life <strong>and</strong> death. They tend to look <strong>for</strong> ways that they already know<br />
<strong>and</strong> use technologies <strong>and</strong> skills they already have.<br />
There<strong>for</strong>e – the second step in managing organizational development is to exp<strong>and</strong> the base of<br />
available behaviours that involve corresponding technologies, organizational arrangements <strong>and</strong><br />
skills. In some cases, learning new skills may be a sufficient precondition <strong>for</strong> corresponding<br />
changes. Consciously or not, some people may think that how they do something is more<br />
convenient <strong>for</strong> them than any other way. But if their knowledge of options increases, their thinking<br />
may change. Very often nothing except new skills is needed <strong>for</strong> a change to happen. But it is not<br />
always so easy. Changing technologies may require considerable investment or cause a lot of<br />
expenditures <strong>and</strong> inconveniences. Changing the organizational arrangement may require<br />
implementing new procedures, <strong>for</strong>mal <strong>and</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mal structures, ways of interaction <strong>and</strong><br />
collaboration, etc. - a lot of headaches <strong>for</strong> the leadership <strong>and</strong> seemingly useless ef<strong>for</strong>ts <strong>for</strong> those<br />
in the organization who do not think these changes are absolutely necessary.<br />
Thus, the way that people live in organizations depends on many internal <strong>and</strong> external factors.<br />
Among these factors, there are three crucially important one – what they know, what they can do,<br />
<strong>and</strong> what they think about what they can do. All these factors may be addressed by the<br />
corresponding training interventions.<br />
151