Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL
Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL
Organizational Development: A Manual for Managers and ... - FPDL
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The second barrier of this kind is related to the perception of what is important. “In most cases,<br />
managers <strong>and</strong> staff are focused on achieving those aspects of per<strong>for</strong>mance which are explicitly<br />
measured. The systems <strong>and</strong> procedures of the organization … tend to determine which<br />
characteristics of the organization receive more attention. … Staff in an organization will seek to<br />
achieve the targets, which are established through reported measurement – those things which the<br />
organization instructs them through its measurement system to regard as important.<br />
The role of culture is, probably, obvious. Differently from <strong>for</strong>mal procedures, cultural norms are<br />
semi-’voluntary’; they are of a social nature <strong>and</strong> cannot be administered by management in the<br />
same way as <strong>for</strong>mal regulations. Cultural norms do not know exclusions. If the head of the<br />
department can af<strong>for</strong>d not to have time to talk with a client who appeals to him – then a clerk of<br />
smaller rank may also ‘be too busy’. If somebody may be coarse with a client, <strong>and</strong> it is tolerated,<br />
then any one else may do the same. <strong>Organizational</strong> culture is a feature of an organization as a<br />
whole. It may be customer oriented or not. Quality may be a value, or not. In many cases, culture<br />
is the only serious barrier to a good quality of service.<br />
<strong>Organizational</strong> design – is not only the organizational structure. It involves all aspects of the<br />
interrelations <strong>and</strong> functioning of all elements. Any organization operates in the way it was<br />
designed. There may be a lot of barriers <strong>for</strong> quality. Beck<strong>for</strong>d describes three of them:<br />
“The first, <strong>and</strong> most frequent, error is what can be called institutionalized conflict. This means that<br />
an organization has been designed in such a way that conflict between quality <strong>and</strong> some other<br />
characteristics; such as productivity, is inherent…<br />
The second barrier is… the design of the organization’s in<strong>for</strong>mation system. This does not simply<br />
mean the computerized management of an executive in<strong>for</strong>mation system, but the whole of<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation generating <strong>and</strong> processing activity of the organization, both <strong>for</strong>mal <strong>and</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mal. These<br />
activities must generate the right in<strong>for</strong>mation, in the right <strong>for</strong>mat, at the right time, <strong>and</strong> deliver it to<br />
the right decision makers if it is to be of any benefit…<br />
The next barrier to quality is one of underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> articulating roles within the organization,<br />
particularly among staff involved in control <strong>and</strong> development functions… There is a tendency<br />
among many such staff to delve into the operation of the organization, perhaps taking direct control<br />
when errors occur or the unexpected happens. While doing so they may be neglecting their own<br />
roles within the organization. This ‘fire-fighting’ or ‘crisis’ style of management is seen in many<br />
organizations as heroic… A low-level intervention by senior management will rarely address the<br />
root, or fundamental cause of the problem <strong>and</strong> that is their proper role, not to deal with operational<br />
105