03.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

[618] <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> 716<br />

librarians to review <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong>. The board then had the option to act on<br />

the trio's recommendation.<br />

The fix was in: dominating the team was Uri Toch—the STDL's<br />

translator for Hebrew, the state language of Israel. Toch concocted a highly<br />

inflammatory five-page smear of <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong>.<br />

This "review" was leaked to the press along with the seemingly<br />

contradictory announcement the library was still going to put the book on<br />

the shelves, despite the negative review.<br />

The STDL trio said that since the debate over the book was "largely a<br />

political issue," they were recommending <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> be added to the<br />

library even though they said the book was, among other things, "poorly<br />

written, repetitive [and] based on questionable research methods and<br />

sources." They charged that Piper quoted sources out of context said that he<br />

selectively quoted sources that fit his thesis and ignored others that did not.<br />

The trio endorsed the Warren Commission's "lone nut thesis, saying<br />

only "buffs" believe here was a conspiracy in the JFK assassination.<br />

Although I was amused at the allegation the book was `poorly written,"<br />

the other charges were far more serious and in response I compiled a<br />

thoroughly documented (and I think devastating) 88-page response,<br />

eviscerating the malicious review.<br />

In the title of my response, I (accurately) dubbed the library critique<br />

"The Star Chamber <strong>Judgment</strong>," harkening back to the 17th century English<br />

tribunals that met in secret, delving out severe aid arbitrary punishments ID<br />

those who dared challenge the power of the British crown. The analogy was<br />

very much on the mark.<br />

What is interesting (but not surprising) is that the Israeli language<br />

translator and his team had gone to great lengths (however clumsy) to try to<br />

refute the thesis of the book.<br />

POLICE STATE TACTICS<br />

Meanwhile, the pro-Israel partisans on the library board issued a<br />

statement saying the librarians had been "professional" and "graceful" in<br />

their malevolent attack on me and on the book.<br />

Then, at one point, the Israeli translator tried to get Bollyn arrested.<br />

Speaking to Toch on he telephone, Bollyn asked Toch (in Hebrew) were<br />

Toch had lived in Israel. Toch called the police, crying he felt "threatened."<br />

Enough was enough. On May 21, 2000, having decided—once<br />

again—to confront my critics head on, I traveled to Schaumburg and spoke<br />

at the library itself before some 150 people who turned out for the event.<br />

Notably absent were the three librarians—but they did have at least one<br />

vocal supporter who did show up. As Christopher Bollyn opened the<br />

meeting, there was a minor ruckus as a person identified as a member of the<br />

local Jewish community attempted to disrupt the event, shouting angrily<br />

that "Gerald Posner's Case Closed tells the truth about the JFK<br />

assassination. Its available right here in the library." Posner's admirer

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!