03.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

693 <strong>Final</strong> Word? [595]<br />

In a similar vein, longtime JFK assassination researcher George<br />

Michael Evica has referred to my documentation of the Mossad connections<br />

of Permindex as being part of the "Communist" false sponsors of<br />

disinformation in the JFK assassination and described <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> as<br />

being "itself a valuable exercise in 'false flags,' patsies and inverted plots,<br />

but like the Garrison investigation, a major venting of False Sponsorship<br />

`leads,' which, paradoxically is its most significant value."<br />

Evica makes a good point that there has been quite a bit of<br />

disinformation relating to the JFK assassination in circulation over the<br />

years, but he is obviously unwilling to concede the possibility that those<br />

wonderful intelligence operatives at the Mossad had anything to do with it.<br />

Evidently, in Evica's view, the Mossad is the only intelligence agency<br />

in the world that kept its hands clean as far as the JFK assassination is<br />

concerned. As I keep saying to people: "If the Mossad and Israel loved JFK<br />

so much, why don't JFK researchers go to the Mossad and ask them to find<br />

out what really happened to JFK and settle the matter once and for all?"<br />

But that would ruin all the fun, since, as we saw in Chapter 16 of <strong>Final</strong><br />

<strong>Judgment</strong>, the Mossad already claims that the Mafia accidentally killed JFK<br />

in a hit aimed at John Connally! Yet the defenders of Israel among the JFK<br />

researchers still don't seem to be satisfied with their wonderful Mossad's<br />

final solution. I wonder why?<br />

' T H E C U S T O D I A N ' v s . ' T H E A U T H O R '<br />

One Virginia McCullough who bills herself as "the custodian and<br />

curator of the Mae Brussell Collection" took issue with my description of<br />

Miss Brussell as being "eccentric" and declared in an Internet posting on<br />

Dec. 17, 1999 that "Piper had his own agenda and part of that agenda was to<br />

discredit any researcher or any author but himself' but then went on to<br />

admit, contradictorily, that "simultaneously Piper shows his undying<br />

admiration for the likes of Mark Lane, Seymour Hersh, Andrew and Leslie<br />

Cockburn, Stephen Green, etc."<br />

Then, after describing my "undying admiration" for those other<br />

authors, McCullough once again contradicted herself by saying that in the<br />

pages of <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong>, "the only author who comes out smelling like<br />

roses and is pure and clean is, of course, Mr. Piper." (Figure that one out, if<br />

you can.) McCullough also expressed concern that, according to her, I<br />

"refer constantly" to myself as "the author." (How else should I do it? If<br />

anyone has any suggestions, please let me know!) She also adds that she<br />

considers my book "written for the purpose of self-promotion and<br />

disinformation." But McCullough has yet to refute anything that appears in<br />

<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong>.<br />

McCullough's heroine, Miss Brussell, claimed that ex-Nazis had a hand<br />

in the JFK assassination and that a likely villain was former Nazi general<br />

Reinhard Gehlen who was drafted into the service of the West against the<br />

Soviets after World War II.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!