Final_Judgment

653 Questions & Answers [557]
book by a CIA-connected author claims this was a KGB scheme. In the
"Final Word?" section of Final Judgment, I'll be addressing that in some
detail further.
All in all, if there's anybody who's alive today who knows what really
happened in Dallas, it's undoubtedly Hunt. However, if Hunt should ever
find the need or a reason to "go public" with "what he knows," I do believe
we might want to take what he says with a grain of salt. Hunt is a very
skilled spy novelist and a prolific one at that, and if some publisher offered
him a few million dollars to "tell all," it's conceivable that Hunt—in
collaboration with the CIA, or maybe just on his own—will come up with
some fantastic story that will satisfy the public craving and that he will, thus,
set himself—and his story—as the final judgment as to what happened in
Dallas. And that could result in the truth being buried forever. I'm afraid too
many people will be ready to believe anything Hunt says simply because he
is who he is. So let's be careful about believing what Hunt might say.
I will make this prediction, though: if Hunt does come forth with some
"final solution" to the mystery that it will come down to a story that the
assassination was a KGB conspiracy—with Castro connections—and that
some "rogue" CIA operatives somehow got caught in the middle. This
could be the final linchpin for a last-ditch attack on Castro and since the
Soviet Union has gone out of business, it won't really matter very much
whether Hunt blames them or not.
Isn't Jim Marrs' book, CrossFire, the book that even more so than
Final Judgment pulls together all of the JFK theories and allows the
reader to make a final judgment for himself?
Crossfire is a wonderful book and provides a comprehensive overview
of all of the JFK assassination lore that was available at the time it went to
press. I am hopeful that if Marrs re-issues Crossfire in an up-dated edition
that he will mention the theory that appears in Final Judgment, if only to try
to tear it apart. But I don't think he can. If he is capable of so doing, I hope
that he will attempt to do it in a responsible fashion.
All in all, I don't think that Marrs comes to any real conclusions one
way or another. He hints that perhaps LBJ may have been responsible for
the assassination and he also points a finger at the "military-industrial
complex" but that's about it.
I would suggest that people read Crossfire before they even read Final
Judgment because it is an outstanding compendium of the basic theories and
findings regarding the assassination and once you understand the gist of
those theories you will see how Final Judgment does indeed tie them
together in a relatively simple theory that does make ultimate sense.
Many people have told me that they had read virtually all of the other
books on the assassination but that mine was the one that truly did tie it all
together and which provided the most comprehensive explanation of what
really happened.