03.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

[556] <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> 652<br />

As we saw in Chapter 16, it was clearly James Angleton at the CIA<br />

who was responsible for leaking the internal CIA memo that placed Hunt in<br />

Dallas at the time of the assassination, laying the grist for the story that<br />

ultimately resulted in Hunt's libel suit against The Spotlight.<br />

In the opinion of investigative reporter Joe Trento (who, by the way, is a<br />

sworn enemy of The Spotlight newspaper, once having been forced to settle<br />

a libel suit against him by The Spotlight's publisher, Willis Carto) it is likely<br />

not only that Hunt was indeed in Dallas and that it was Angleton who sent him<br />

there. However, Hunt isn't admitting to anything.<br />

It appears to me that Hunt was functioning as a facilitator, so to speak, in<br />

the JFK assassination conspiracy, engaged in Dallas (and in New Orleans)<br />

with some of the other people who were circling around Lee Harvey<br />

Oswald. It's very conceivable that Hunt had no idea that his mission in Dallas<br />

involved an actual assassination plot—perhaps he was only involved in a<br />

"dummy" assassination plot that was manipulated and overtaken by<br />

outside forces and turned into the real thing—and I explored this possibility<br />

in Chapter 16.<br />

Consider this: Although Hunt met up with Miss Lorenz and Frank<br />

Sturgis and money passed from Hunt to Sturgis, this doesn't necessarily<br />

indicate that—even though Sturgis himself later told Lorenz that his team<br />

had been involved in killing the president—that Hunt knew an actual<br />

assassination was in the offing. He may have known—but not necessarily.<br />

However, he put himself in the position where, after the fact, he looked<br />

guilty as Hell, considering the later testimony by Lorenz.<br />

However, we must consider the fact that—whatever happened in<br />

Dallas—Hunt nonetheless later once again teamed up with Frank Sturgis<br />

during the Watergate fiasco that led to the "assassination" of another<br />

president, and in Watergate, too, as we have seen, there was a distinct<br />

Israeli connection, also involving Angleton.<br />

Crank into that the fact—as we now know—that Frank Sturgis was not<br />

only a CIA asset, but had also long been involved in Mossad intrigue, and<br />

we find a very interesting set of wheels within wheels, so to speak.<br />

But Hunt was—and is—a loyal CIA man and he's not admitting to<br />

anything one way or another. And when Hunt needed a witness from the<br />

CIA in his libel trial, it was Angleton's long-time deputy, Newton "Scotty"<br />

Miler, who came to Hunt's rescue. I don't think this is any surprise.<br />

So although it appears that in 1978 the CIA was initially planning to<br />

throw Hunt to the wolves and frame him for involvement in the<br />

assassination—painted as a "rogue" operative—by his former CIA<br />

superiors, by the time his libel trial against The Spotlight came to pass that<br />

he and the CIA reached an accord and they provided him assistance. It<br />

appears that precisely because The Spotlight article unveiled the intended<br />

"limited hangout" aimed against Hunt that the operation was shelved.<br />

Recall that a "Dear Mr. Hunt" letter, ostensibly from Lee Harvey Oswald,<br />

popped up at the time that this "limited hangout" operation was in its<br />

opening stages as the House Assassinations Committee was beginning its<br />

inquiry. I believe that this was another Angleton dirty trick, although a new

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!