03.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

649 Questions & Answers [553]<br />

I would be inclined to think that Hoover probably had advance<br />

knowledge that there was a plot or plots against JFK—perhaps even the one<br />

that ultimately succeeded—if only because of his wide-ranging intelligence<br />

network that had connections to the very conspirators who were intimately<br />

involved in the actual planning of the assassination. I would add that he<br />

probably allowed the assassination to take place and did nothing to interfere<br />

with the conspiracy's progress. It wouldn't have been in Hoover's interests<br />

to stop the assassination. I find it highly unlikely that Hoover had any part<br />

in planning the assassination and no one has ever been able to find any<br />

evidence that he did. Hoover's actual participation was not, of course,<br />

critical to actually carrying out the deed.<br />

Frankly, it would have been better (from the standpoint of the<br />

conspirators) that Hoover not have any advance knowledge or actually be<br />

given any such knowledge. That would have only given Hoover more<br />

leverage and the less people who were in the know, the better.<br />

I've heard that Hoover was supposedly at a party in Dallas at the ranch<br />

of his good friend Clint Murchison, the Texas oil baron, the night before the<br />

assassination, reveling in the company of LBJ and even reportedly Richard<br />

Nixon but this appears to me to be just another one of those exciting rumors<br />

that take on a life of their own.<br />

People love stories such as this, but even if Hoover was in Dallas that<br />

day before the assassination (and I've never really seen it confirmed that he<br />

was, and frankly I doubt it), it doesn't mean he had anything to do with the<br />

assassination.<br />

The question of whether Hoover was involved in the cover-up is<br />

another story, inasmuch as it was the FBI that was providing information to<br />

the Warren Commission's investigation. So in that sense Hoover was<br />

involved in the cover-up. Hoover is an outstanding villain but his sole crime<br />

vis-à-vis the JFK assassination, I suppose, is that he was J. Edgar Hoover.<br />

What about Richard Nixon and George Bush? Do you think that<br />

either of them had anything at all to do with any aspect of the<br />

assassination conspiracy? There have been stories about this floating<br />

around for years.<br />

Richard Nixon has become another bogeyman among JFK<br />

assassination theorists, but there's no more evidence to link Nixon to the<br />

assassination any more than there is any evidence to link Hoover. It's an<br />

exciting theory, but that's all it is and let's keep that in mind.<br />

George Bush's name is also linked time and again to the assassination<br />

and in <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> I explored this in some detail, but again, it seems<br />

highly unlikely that Bush was part of any assassination planning, but<br />

apparently as part of his work for the CIA—although he denies he was<br />

working for the CIA in 1963—Bush did have ties to the anti-Castro Cuban<br />

exiles and it's likely that Bush, at one time or another, may have crossed<br />

paths with people who may have had some direct hand in manipulating a<br />

portion of the overall conspiracy.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!