03.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

[552] <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> 648<br />

she states flatly that some years ago she was in contact with a person she<br />

believes was actually Jack Ruby. Her story is that "Ruby" claimed to have<br />

been subjected to surgical masking and some form of hypnosis and she<br />

presents this story as though she gives it credibility.<br />

Now this story sounds as possibly outlandish as Grace Pratt's story to<br />

some people, but I don't discount this possibility, nor do I think it actually<br />

conflicts with Mrs. Pratt's story in any way. Both things could have<br />

happened: Ruby could have gone to Israel and he could have undergone<br />

plastic surgery. With all of the stories we hear about the Federal Witness<br />

Protection Program, why can't we consider the possibility that something<br />

"unusual" did take place at the time of Ruby's reported death?<br />

So there is another story out there circulating that suggests there was more<br />

to Ruby's death than meets the eye. I would strongly urge some JFK<br />

assassination researcher to tackle this controversy and get to the bottom of<br />

it. I don't intend to do it myself. In any case I will conclude by pointing out<br />

that whether Jack Ruby died at the time he is supposed to have died—or not—<br />

is immaterial to the thesis of <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong>. Anyone who seeks to discredit<br />

<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> by citing the Grace Pratt story and suggesting that it reflects<br />

the tone or the overall thesis of the book is being dishonest.<br />

What do you see as the biggest flaw in the widely-promoted theory<br />

that "The Mafia Killed JFK"?<br />

Anybody could have actually killed JFK, even including as the Warren<br />

Commission claimed, one lone nut. The big question in the assassination<br />

conspiracy is: who had the power to cover up the conspiracy? The Mafia<br />

didn't have that power, despite its wide-ranging connections nationally and<br />

internationally. And it was not the Mafia that convened the Warren<br />

Commission and dictated its actions from top to bottom. There is no<br />

question that there were definite repeated links to the Mafia throughout the<br />

JFK assassination conspiracy, even including among those who had ties to<br />

the CIA. But the Mafia did not have the power to be manipulating the CIA's<br />

strange activities in Mexico City that were designed to link Lee Harvey<br />

Oswald to a purported Soviet KGB assassinations expert. In the pages of<br />

<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong>, I think, I firmly demolish any suggestion that the Mafia<br />

was ultimately responsible for the JFK assassination. Now with the<br />

revelation that Mossad-connected Hyman Lamer was the real "boss" of<br />

Sam Giancana, the famed "Mafia" chief in Chicago, the old legend that "the<br />

Mafia Killed JFK" finds itself entangled with a very significant Mossad<br />

connection that casts new light on the secret history of organized crime.<br />

Did FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover have any part in the planning of<br />

the JFK assassination? Did Hoover know that JFK was slated for<br />

assassination? Was Hoover involved in the cover-up? In <strong>Final</strong><br />

<strong>Judgment</strong> you never precisely answer these questions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!