Final_Judgment

607 Questions & Answers [511]
Frankly, I don't know how reliable he is, any more than anyone knows
how reliable any source is on any aspect of anything involving the JFK
assassination. No one can vouch for the total reliability of any source.
However, everything that I know about him (based upon the information
that he provided about himself, plus the endorsement he received from ex-
Congressman Paul Findley who put me in touch with him) leads me to
believe that my French source is not only sincere, but totally reliable.
Pierre Neuville himself said "in the suspicion business there are no nice
guys, only bad guys." In other words, what appear to be "friendly" sources
from the "suspicion business" [i.e. the world of intelligence] might, in fact,
by enemies providing you disinformation and misinformation. And it was
even the Mossad's man at the CIA, James Jesus Angleton, who called the
world of intelligence "a wilderness of mirrors."
At any rate, the bottom line is that Final Judgment can stand or fall on
its own merits, without the specific input of this French source. In addition,
as I noted earlier, I could have easily published the book without delving
into the French Connection and still, I believe, provided the readers a very
strong case for Mossad involvement in the JFK assassination.
What I believe I have done, though, in Final Judgment is to draw a
very fine and significant line between the French Connection to the JFK
assassination and the New Orleans Connection (so to speak) that involves
the two CIA assets, Guy Banister and Clay Shaw, right to the Israel
Connection. Anyone could have done it without my French source.
After Final Judgment was published, did anyone come forth with
any "inside" information that wasn't included in the original edition?
There has not been anything that I have received, other than the
communications from my French source who ultimately identified himself
by name and gave me his complete history, including some rather striking
details about his own interesting family and its background. In the
postscript to Final Judgment I've provided background on Pierre's own
experiences with the Mossad. However, since the book was published, no
one has come forward with any new information which is of an "inside"
nature. I myself have discovered further published information confirming
other details that appeared in the original edition of Final Judgment and in
the revised editions, including this most recent edition.
How long did it take you to write the book?
From the time the idea actually began to formulate in my mind when I
began the serious research to the time the first draft was completed was
roughly seven months. After I began researching the French Connection
after my French source read the first draft and pointed me in that direction,
it took an additional three months to fine tune my manuscript and add the
new findings that I'd uncovered. However, it was a never-ending process, as I
found out after the book was published and that's why in the third edition