03.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

534 The Continuing Cover-Up [437]<br />

goes deeper. Our Kennedy obsession obscures something crucial. He was,<br />

at best, a mediocre president or, less charitably, a lousy one." 1094<br />

Samuelson went on to blame Kennedy for the tragedy of the war in<br />

Vietnam. "It was Kennedy who made the critical commitment to Vietnam.<br />

All the subsequent speculation about whether he would or wouldn't have<br />

increased that commitment, as Johnson did, is really irrelevant. We can<br />

never know what Kennedy would have done, only what he did. And what<br />

he did was make a major military (and political) commitment to a country<br />

whose survival was not a vital national interest, and thereby, involves us in a<br />

conflict that politically we could not sustain. Once this happened, there<br />

was no easy exit. Bad judgment." 1095<br />

The opinionated columnist determined that JFK lacked "wisdom or<br />

good instincts" and that he did "not have the background or values to make<br />

good decisions by himself." 1096<br />

"The Kennedy who lives beyond the grave," concluded Samuelson,<br />

"commands neither my sympathy nor my interest. He is simplified,<br />

romanticized and exploited. He is not a person but a popular delusion." 1097<br />

So much for the memory of John F. Kennedy in the judgment of one of the<br />

nation's most respected opinion-makers. Perhaps, then, it should be no<br />

surprise that on November 22, 1994—the 31st anniversary of the JFK<br />

assassination—the Washington Post, America's political newspaper of<br />

record, said not a single word in commemoration of that tragic day.<br />

By November 22, 1997—four years after Samuelson's harsh attack on<br />

John Kennedy—the big "news" of the day was the release of The Dark Side<br />

of Camelot, Seymour Hersh's book about the JFK years (discussed earlier<br />

in these pages). Clearly, the new media thrust is to say that John F. Kennedy<br />

wasn't really such a great guy after all and that maybe, as Malcolm X said at<br />

the time of the JFK assassination, the chickens had come home to roost.<br />

ASKING FOR A DEBATE<br />

Just prior to the release of the third edition of <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong>, I sent<br />

copies of the second edition to a number of individuals inviting them to<br />

debate the thesis of <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> with me—on radio or in any public<br />

forum or in writing. I gave them the opportunity to refute the book in the<br />

manner they wished. Not an unfair offer, I should think.<br />

Here are those who received copies of <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> and the<br />

invitation to a debate:<br />

Jack Anderson - The syndicated columnist and international wheelerdealer<br />

who has promoted a number of conflicting theories about the JFK<br />

assassination, notably the myth that "Castro Killed JFK."<br />

Robert Dornan - Then a GOP congressman from Orange County,<br />

California and a shrieking devotee of Israel, Dornan later joined his arch foe,<br />

Rep. Loretta Sanchez, in co-hosting a September 19, 1998 fund-raiser to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!