Final_Judgment

[432] Final Judgment 529
This author can only conclude that these "researchers" who have spun
their wheels, expended vast amounts of time, energy and money (not to
mention having made money at that) in delving into the JFK affair would
rather not cross the line, so to speak. I understand their reasoning, of course,
but, at the same time, I am compelled to question their integrity.
However, there have been a number of long-time JFK assassination
researchers who have privately favorably acknowledged Final Judgment
and the substance of its claims, whether they agree with its conclusions in
the entirety or not. I will not name them here and thereby burden them with
the possibility of being tarred as "anti-Semites"—the favorite term reserved
for those who dare to criticize the actions of Israel—but they know who
they are and their support has been appreciated.
SIMILAR CONCLUSIONS
Just before Final Judgment was first published, I was delighted to learn that
one long-time JFK assassination researcher, Philip Ten Brink, working
entirely independently of this author, not so surprisingly reached essentially
the same conclusions reached in Final Judgment, even up to and including a
number of fine points that some might find somewhat esoteric. I am
compelled to repeat the old saw that "great minds think alike," but I would
be overstating the case in so doing. It is simply that the facts are there for
those who wish to recognize them for what they are.
Ten Brink discovered on his own that pointing the finger in the
direction of Israel and the Mossad is not good public relations. When he
spoke on his findings at the 1993 symposium of the JFK Assassination
Information Center in Dallas, Ten Brink advised me, there were a lot of
people who were uneasy, to say the least, that someone within their ranks
was being "politically incorrect." Hats off to Ten Brink for having the guts
to call the shots at he saw it. The same can't be said for those JFK
assassination researchers who see the truth but are afraid to admit it.
After the fourth edition of Final Judgment was published, I learned of
another JFK researcher, Dave Sharp, who had been active on Internet news
groups for some time, making the allegation that Jewish political interests—
particularly the Bronfman family of Canada—were behind the JFK
assassination. At that point, not having yet read Final Judgment, Sharp
apparently had no idea of the conflict between JFK and Ben-Gurion over
Israel's nuclear bomb, so it would seem that Final Judgment did indeed fill
in a missing piece of the puzzle for Sharp.
However, Sharp himself has since then been critical of Final Judgment,
suggesting that I fell down on the job in failing to discuss the Holocaust and
the way that it has been used as a political tool by the Israeli lobby. That's
Sharp's opinion, of course, but—as I have said time and again—Final
Judgment is about the JFK assassination, not about the Holocaust.