03.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

490 The Battle of the Books [393]<br />

The primary role that I see the Cubans playing in the conspiracy was<br />

having helped lay the groundwork for the cover-story that the hapless<br />

Oswald was a "pro-Castro agitator." The Cubans—both the pro- and anti-<br />

Castro Cubans—were, in my view, little more than additional "false flags"<br />

planted in the midst of the assassination conspiracy landscape by those<br />

ultimately responsible for the crime.<br />

In <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> I relied heavily on Morrow's book, The Senator<br />

Must Die, for information on the assassination of Senator Robert F.<br />

Kennedy. This book suggests that the Iranian secret police, SAVAK, carried<br />

out RFK's murder on contract from the CIA. I haven't seen any evidence<br />

anywhere to indicate that Morrow might not be in part correct on this, and<br />

in <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> I have noted that SAVAK was a joint creation of the<br />

Mossad and the CIA.<br />

There had long been a close covert relationship between the Mossad and<br />

the CIA and the Iranians, although many people have been unaware of this<br />

fact. So if RFK was killed by SAVAK as Morrow says, that to me suggests<br />

that we should look further into an Israeli connection there, although<br />

Morrow, of course, doesn't get into that.<br />

I do have to say that I do have some doubts about Morrow's overall<br />

reliability in the sense that it is sometimes very difficult to determine what is<br />

indeed his own first-hand knowledge or what is his opinion or what others have<br />

told him.<br />

Morrow's books are interesting and provide many fascinating leads.<br />

There's no doubt about it. However, I am deeply concerned that Morrow<br />

seems to suggest that James Angleton of the CIA was somehow out of the<br />

loop as far as the JFK assassination and cover-up was concerned—and<br />

nothing could be further from the truth.<br />

The fact that Morrow was a CIA contract operative moving in some<br />

rather unsavory circles is another factor to consider in all of this. People in<br />

such a position don't always know who they really are working for.<br />

Sometimes they think they are working for one purpose when, in fact, they<br />

are working for another purpose. And they don't always know all of the<br />

facts. So Morrow's own experiences (and his account of his experiences)<br />

have inevitably been colored by all of this. I'm not suggesting that Morrow<br />

was a dupe or a patsy, but I suggest that we should look at his first hand<br />

account with caution.<br />

A note of interest: I have been reliably informed that Morrow is<br />

familiar with the thesis presented in <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> and by this time he<br />

may well have read the book. He has yet to contact me however.<br />

HUGH McDONALD<br />

In <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> I have discussed the books Appointment in Dallas<br />

and the follow-up work, LBJ & the JFK Conspiracy, both by Hugh<br />

McDonald, another former contract operative for both the FBI and the CIA.<br />

I've pointed out that I don't find either of these works particularly credible.<br />

The first volume was co-authored by Geoffrey Bocca, a former propagandist

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!