03.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

[388] <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> 485<br />

One other book on the Garrison investigation of Clay Shaw is Edward<br />

Jay Epstein's Counterplot. It's an all-out attack on Garrison—a slender<br />

volume that I wouldn't mention if it otherwise weren't for the fact that it<br />

was Epstein who wrote the book.<br />

This is significant, as I have noted in <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong>, in that Epstein<br />

was a close associate of CIA man James Angleton and it was also Epstein<br />

who also wrote the one book Legend (a biography of Lee Harvey Oswald)<br />

that most closely reflects Angleton's own JFK cover story: that ultimately<br />

the Soviet KGB was behind the assassination of President Kennedy, whether<br />

by accident or by design. Epstein suggests that Oswald had been co-opted by<br />

the KGB and that he committed the crime acting alone–with or without the<br />

orders of his KGB superiors. That book received wide play in the<br />

Establishment media.<br />

Interestingly, Epstein also wrote the book Inquest that was hailed by the<br />

media as an important critique of the Warren Commission Report. However,<br />

I've always felt that this volume was an Establishment "cover story"<br />

suggesting that while there were problems with the way the Warren<br />

Commission conducted its investigation, there was nothing to worry about<br />

in the end. In any case, none of Epstein's books are of any real value.<br />

Jim Garrison himself wrote his own account of his investigation.<br />

Entitled On the Trail of the Assassins, it's an interesting and well-written<br />

book. I would suggest, however, that the book is somewhat of a<br />

disappointment in that it is more a free-flowing personal memoir on the<br />

case, rather than a detailed account of the investigation that many would<br />

have found far more enlightening.<br />

The most recent study focusing on the Garrison investigation is James<br />

DiEugenio's Destiny Betrayed. This is an important book in that it<br />

examines much of the evidence in the Garrison investigation (more so even<br />

than Garrison's own book) and essentially proves that Garrison was right<br />

when he targeted Clay Shaw for involvement in the JFK assassination<br />

conspiracy. We don't know precisely what role Shaw played in the<br />

conspiracy, but DiEugenio demonstrates beyond question that he was mixed<br />

up somewhere in the middle of it.<br />

There are some problems with the book. I find DiEugenio's hero<br />

worship of JFK a little overwhelming. One would think that JFK was<br />

almost a God. Because DiEugenio seems to betray a somewhat naive pro-<br />

Kennedy bias, coming from a liberal perspective, DiEugenio falls into the<br />

trap of perceiving and portraying Clay Shaw as being "right wing." As I<br />

told DiEugenio in correspondence, his book fails in that he does not pursue<br />

Shaw's Permindex Connection to its ultimate Israeli Connection.<br />

There might be an explanation for this. The book was published under<br />

the auspices of the Sheridan Square Press (which, incidentally, also<br />

published Garrison's book) which is affiliated with the Institute for Media<br />

Analysis. This institute, as we already noted in Appendix Three, receives<br />

money from the Stern Family Fund.<br />

This foundation is the creation of the Stern family of New Orleans who<br />

were not only Clay Shaw's close friends, but also leading backers of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!