03.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

[386] <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> 483<br />

Even after the release of Oliver Stone's JFK, Anson went to work and<br />

published attacks on Garrison and other JFK assassination researchers. In<br />

one published article Anson claimed that in his own book Garrison never<br />

mentioned that he (Garrison) had been indicted on corruption and tax evasion<br />

charges. In fact Garrison has a whole chapter on this in his book and this<br />

leads me to believe that Anson hadn't read the book.<br />

JFK: The Facts & the Theories by Carl Oglesby is quite good, but my<br />

own problem with Oglesby is that although he acknowledges the Permindex<br />

Connection he falls into that peculiar trap of suggesting that Permindex is<br />

some sort of "Nazi Connection" to the JFK assassination when, as we've<br />

seen, nothing could be further from the truth. Other than that the book is<br />

worth reading for a good overview.<br />

Crime & Cover-Up: The Dallas-Watergate Connection by Peter Dale<br />

Scott, a slim monograph on the subject, is fascinating. It examines the<br />

special interest groups in Washington that were opposed to JFK and their<br />

ties to Organized Crime and the intelligence community. Needless to say,<br />

however, Scott doesn't get into the Israeli Connection.<br />

Likewise with Scott's equally fascinating, far lengthier, and more recent<br />

Deep Politics and The Death of JFK. This book is severely flawed in that<br />

just when one thinks that Scott is about to get into the Israeli Connection<br />

(whether through his discussion of Organized Crime or through the CIA),<br />

Scott very carefully tiptoes away.<br />

Scott's research is deficient in that despite the depth and breadth of his<br />

work he never gets into the Garrison investigation whatsoever. There I<br />

believe is another very serious flaw. One never knows precisely who Scott<br />

suspects of responsibility for the assassination. As I have said, Scott says<br />

very much, but at the same time, says very little. Nonetheless his writings<br />

are well worth your while.<br />

THE 'FICTIONAL' APPROACH<br />

At this juncture I'd like to discuss several of the novels that have<br />

appeared over the years dealing with the JFK assassination. The most<br />

notable is Executive Action by Mark Lane and Donald Freed which actually<br />

appeared in the wake of the film by the same name. (Mark Lane was the<br />

prime mover behind the film, but in the end was disappointed with the final<br />

product). This book demonstrates how high-level power brokers could have<br />

orchestrated the assassination.<br />

Robert Morrow's novel, Betrayal, is similar in many ways to Executive<br />

Action. It is presented as a novelized treatment of Morrow's own purported<br />

experiences as a CIA contract operative who became unwittingly enmeshed<br />

in the JFK assassination conspiracy. Morrow indicts Clay Shaw as one of<br />

the conspirators–perhaps the primary conspirator—and paints him as some<br />

sort of "rogue" CIA agent operating without official sanction of the CIA. In<br />

subsequent years Morrow issued a revised edition of this book in a nonfiction<br />

format and I will discuss that later.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!