Final_Judgment

478 ”Deep Throat” [381]
New York Times columnist William Safire as having said that for "the first
time, a candidate for President has delivered a major address which he knew
would disturb and dismay every American supporter of Israel." 986
Rackman commented: "This is true. But does not this observation
signify more than it says? Does it not mean that in Connally we have, for
the first time, a candidate who in no uncertain terms is telling the American
people that he does not want the support of Jews and that he wants to prove
that one can be elected president without Jewish support.
"Furthermore, does it not mean that at long last we have a candidate who
hopes to get elected by mobilizing support from all who share his total disregard
of how Jews feel about him and is this not an invitation to all anti-Semites to
rally behind him? I am generally not an alarmist but nothing in American
politics in recent years so disturbed me as Connally's subtle communication to
Jews that they can `go to the devil.' Even the Nixon tapes were not so upsetting.
"The American Jewish community must be alerted. If only we had
stopped Hitler early enough, millions of Jews would still be alive. And
Connally must be stopped at all costs. He must not even get near the
nomination! He must be destroyed, at least politically, as soon as possible.
It is sufficiently early to make Connally look ridiculous and destroy him
politically without bloodshed.
"Perhaps I am overreacting," said Rackman. "But if I have learned
anything especially from the rabbinic view of Biblical history it is that we
are less fearful and more forgiving of enemies who at least accord us a
modicum of respect than we are of enemies who treat us with disdain, with
contempt. That makes Arafat more acceptable than Connally." 987
Rackman compared Connally with Amalek, another foe of the Jewish
people: "'Remember Amalek,' we are told. 'Don't forget.' Eradicate him
from the face of the earth. Simply because Amalek had no respect for us. He
encountered us in his path and casually sought to exterminate us as vermin.
It is my fervent prayer," said this Jewish religious leader, "that American
Jewry will not minimize the importance of the challenge they have been
given and will act speedily and with devastating effectiveness." 988
John Connally was not eradicated as Rackman urged. But his political
career came to a halt after the major media began a campaign against him.
However, when John Connally died in 1993, the doctors said that
Connally's fatal lung condition was a direct outgrowth of the chest wounds
that he had received in the shooting in Dallas on November 22, 1963. So
ultimately, in the end, John Connally did prove to be yet another victim of
Israel—as much as if he had died on the same day as John F. Kennedy.
YET ANOTHER ASSASSINATION . . .
But this isn't the end of it. There was yet another media-orchestrated
political assassination—with covert intelligence connections—that has its