03.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

456 Retribution? [359]<br />

Veteran JFK assassination investigator Dick Russell has looked into<br />

the Paisley affair. And while Russell has been careful to steer clear of ever<br />

mentioning the possibility of an Israeli connection to the JFK<br />

assassination, Russell has concluded this much about Paisley's death:<br />

"Whatever Paisley was doing in his last years, right up to the moment of<br />

his disappearance, it apparently traced back to the Kennedy era. And I do not<br />

believe that the timing of his disappearance—coming as it had amid a<br />

congressional focus on [what the CIA and the Soviets knew about Lee<br />

Harvey Oswald]—was coincidental." 917 (emphasis added)<br />

PAISLEY vs ISRAEL<br />

What was it that Paisley was involved in just before his death? The<br />

answer to this question points directly toward solving the question of who<br />

killed Paisley and why. And it relates again—precisely—to the conclusions<br />

that we have reached in <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> regarding the question of who killed<br />

John F. Kennedy and why.<br />

Although the death of John Paisley has been of much fascination to<br />

those who have charted the covert wars between the CIA and the KGB (of<br />

which James Angleton was very much a part), it is quite notable that those<br />

who have delved into Paisley's demise have—like Dick Russell—been<br />

reticent to discuss what is very clearly the Mossad connection to the affair.<br />

In the years prior to Paisley's demise, hawkish factions in the Israeli<br />

government were lobbying hard in Washington for more arms aid and cash<br />

infusions through the U.S. foreign aid program. Loyal supporters of Israel<br />

such as Sen. Henry Jackson (D-Wash.) argued that Israel needed more<br />

military might to protect the Middle East against "Soviet aggression"—an<br />

argument that delighted hard-line anti-communists in both political<br />

parties. 918 This, of course, was the same argument that had long been<br />

advanced by the Mossad's chief ally at the CIA, James J. Angleton.<br />

However, U.S. intelligence analysts were scoffing at Israel's alarmist<br />

cries. Led by senior analysts in the Office of National Estimates, they<br />

reassured the White House that, at least for the moment, the Soviets had<br />

neither the intent nor the capability to attack a major target of vital U.S.<br />

interest, such as the oil-rich Gulf states. 919<br />

A-TEAM vs B-TEAM<br />

Nonetheless, Israel's Washington allies maneuvered in an effort to<br />

counter-balance the findings of the Office of National Estimates. Thus,<br />

under political pressure, President Gerald Ford agreed in mid-1976 (while<br />

George Bush was serving as CIA director) to institute a so-called "audit" of<br />

intelligence data provided by the CIA's own National Intelligence Officers<br />

(soon to be called the "A-Team"] by a committee of "independent" experts—<br />

known as the "B-Team." 920<br />

The prime mover behind the concept of such an audit was Leo Cherne,<br />

a veteran figure in the Israeli lobby who also had long-standing connections

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!