Final_Judgment

APPENDIX ONE
Where Was George?
George Bush, the CIA, and the Kennedy Assassination
Did GHWB Have a Hand in the Murder of JFK?
When Sen. Edward M. Kennedy cynically asked "Where
was George?" during a fiery address to the 1988 Democratic
National Convention, was the senator hinting, perhaps, that
he knew so mething that we didn't know? Was Kennedy
really asking "Where was George Herbert Walker Bush on
November 22, 1963?"
Newly-emerging evidence strongly suggests not only that
George Bush has been a CIA asset for most of his adult life—
since his college days in fact—but that he also has had
unusually intimate ties to the circumstances surrounding the
JFK assassination and the subsequent high-level cover-up.
In his best-selling Plausible Denial, author Mark Lane did a great
service to the American public when he re-published, as appendices, two
important articles that appeared in The Nation magazine, but which received
little national notice outside the elite circles who read that journal.
As a consequence, hundreds of thousands of Americans learned
something that they might not otherwise know: the evidence strongly
suggests that George Herbert Walker Bush was an active CIA operative on
November 23, 1963.
The Nation articles, written by Richard McBride (published in the July
16/23 and August 13/20, 1988 issues) took note of a declassified FBI
memorandum dated November 29, 1963. The memorandum, from FBI
Director J. Edgar Hoover, was addressed to the Director of the Bureau of
Intelligence and Research at the Department of State. The subject was
"Assassination of President John F. Kennedy — November 22, 1963." The
memo read as follows:
O ur M ia mi, F lorida, O ffic e o n Novemb e r 2 3 , 1 9 6 3
advised that the office of Coordinator of Cuban Affairs in
Miami advised that the Department of State feels some
misguided anti-Castro group might capitalize on the present
situation and undertake an unauthorized raid against Cuba,
believing that the assass ination o f President J o hn F.
Kennedy might herald a change in U.S. policy, which is not
true.
Our sources and informants familiar with Cuban matters
in the Miami area advise that the general feeling in the anti-
Castro Cuban co mmunity is one of stunned disbelief and,
even a mong those who did not entirely agree with the
President's policy concerning Cuba, the feeling is that the
President's death represents a great loss not only to the U . S .