03.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

340 They Dare Not Speak Out [279]<br />

member of the CIA-funded Citizens Committee for a Free Cuba and the cofounder<br />

of the Citizens Committee for Peace With Freedom in Vietnam. 752<br />

It might be added, in passing, that AIM has consistently also been a<br />

strident defender of Israel and its interests. To even hint at any conspiracy<br />

which might involve Israel and its allies in the CIA would be an outrage,<br />

insofar as AIM would be concerned. So much, then, for accuracy in media<br />

from Accuracy in Media.<br />

OLIVER STONE<br />

What about Oliver Stone's JFK? Where does this controversial film fit<br />

in the lore of JFK assassination conspiracy theories? What of the media's<br />

hysterical response to the film (which actually brought it greater publicity)?<br />

Writing in the New York Times on December 20, 1991, Stone asked a<br />

rather simple question: "When a leader of any country is assassinated, the<br />

media normally ask: 'What political forces were opposed to this leader and<br />

would benefit from his assassination?"<br />

The irony, as we shall see, is that although Oliver Stone himself<br />

seemed to have asked that very question in a big, big way—through the aegis<br />

of his controversial film JFK—the fact is that Stone himself has, in a<br />

sense, proven in the end to have become a major factor in the continuing<br />

cover-up of the real truth about the assassination of John F. Kennedy.<br />

It is ironic indeed that although Stone's film JFK has focused<br />

widespread international attention on the JFK assassination conspiracy, there<br />

has been quiet speculation that the media's furor might be part of a highlevel<br />

plan to further cover up the truth about the conspiracy.<br />

Many JFK assassination researchers, Mark Lane in particular, are deeply<br />

concerned that Stone's film presents a strange mixture of both fact and<br />

fiction. The facts about the assassination conspiracy are sensational enough<br />

without fictional details being added, he and others have pointed out. Lane<br />

summarized it best: "It was good that Stone called the attention of<br />

teenagers and others to the unsolved murder. It was bad that he did so by<br />

falsifying the record." 753<br />

POINTING IN THE WRONG DIRECTION<br />

Although Stone's film referenced, in passing, the CIA connections of<br />

David Ferrie and Clay Shaw—and actually mentioned Permindex—the film's<br />

primary thrust was that the conspiracy originated in the so-called "militaryindustrial"<br />

complex.<br />

The primary conspirators were presented as high-level military men and<br />

their allies among the multi-billion-dollar defense contracting companies.<br />

The intelligence community's role was understated, to say the very least.<br />

This, in itself, lead some of Stone's critics to suggest that perhaps the<br />

ultimate purpose behind the film was not, in fact, to pinpoint those truly<br />

responsible for the JFK assassination, but to point the finger in another

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!