03.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

[258] <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> 319<br />

It was this same Robert Maheu (misspelled as "Mayhew" by Kirkwood)<br />

who was assisting Phelan in the attempt to scuttle the Garrison<br />

investigation—an investigation that would, if pursued to the ultimate, have<br />

exposed the very CIA-organized crime conspiracy against Castro that also<br />

implicated many of those involved in the JFK assassination itself.<br />

In Chapter 11 we examined Maheu's involvement with the CIA and such<br />

organized crime figures as Johnny Rosselli, Sam Giancana and Meyer Lansky<br />

lieutenant Santo Trafficante in detail.<br />

It will also be recalled that the aforementioned Desert Inn (by this time the<br />

property of billionaire Howard Hughes) was initially established by<br />

Meyer Lansky's trusted associate, Morris Dalitz, whose activities and<br />

strange connections we examined in Chapter 10 and Chapter 15.<br />

So it was that the CIA did have its collaborators in key positions to<br />

undermine the Jim Garrison investigation.<br />

GARRISON & MARCELLO<br />

Some of Garrison's more creative foes in the media cleverly came up with<br />

a new way to discredit the New Orleans prosecutor. Instead of really seeking<br />

the truth about the JFK murder, they said, Garrison was, in fact, trying to<br />

cover it up. Garrison—so they said—was a willing tool of Mafia chieftain<br />

Carlos Marcello.<br />

By pointing his finger in the direction of the CIA, the Garrison critics<br />

claimed, the D.A. was trying to take the heat of suspicion off Carlos<br />

Marcello who, they said, was the more likely suspect.<br />

This claim is illogical at best. If Garrison were deliberately trying to<br />

cover up any Marcello connections—if any—to the assassination<br />

conspiracy, he was going about it in the wrong way.<br />

(It was in Chapter 10 where we learned of the campaign against<br />

Garrison led by Life magazine's Richard Billings, who promoted the<br />

Garrison-Marcello scenario. It was Billings, of course, who later served as a<br />

top advisor to the House Assassinations Committee which pointed the<br />

finger of blame for the JFK assassination on "The Mafia,"—and Marcello<br />

in particular. )<br />

If Garrison was trying to protect Marcello, the last person that he<br />

should have picked on was David Ferrie, the Mafia kingpin's sometimepersonal<br />

pilot and occasional legal researcher. Ferrie himself was standing<br />

alongside Marcello in a federal courtroom in New Orleans at the very<br />

moment JFK was shot.<br />

By first inquiring into Ferrie's activities, Garrison was practically<br />

walking right into Marcello's office itself. This fact alone nullifies the<br />

creative (but very much flawed) "Mafia cover-up" critique of Garrison that<br />

continues to hang over Garrison's memory to this day. Yet, those who<br />

push the theory that "The Mafia Killed JFK" ignore this fact.<br />

Evidently the people of New Orleans didn't buy the Establishment's<br />

heavy-handed assault on Garrison. He won re-election to the district<br />

attorney's office, despite—or perhaps precisely because of—the media

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!