Final_Judgment

272 Double Cross in Dallas? [211]
Lee Harvy [sic] Oswald." 588
Subsequent analyses suggested that the letter may or may not have been
Oswald's handwriting (although he was known to misspell even his own
middle name as it was misspelled in the letter. When word of the letter's
existence gained circulation, the reference to a "Mr. Hunt" created immediate
speculation that the Hunt in question was either Texas oilman H. L. Hunt
or, more than likely, E. Howard Hunt.
In light of the then-current rumors about Hunt's alleged role in the JFK
affair, coupled with his known connections to the CIA and, in particular,
Mexico City, where he had been active during his CIA career, the suspicions
about E. Howard Hunt were quite natural.
It is interesting, though, that the letter was sent from Mexico City,
Hunt's former base of operations. Whether the letter was real or not, it is
obvious that someone wanted to throw further suspicion on E. Howard
Hunt—and succeeded.
That the Weberman story of "Hunt as a tramp" and the "Dear Mr. Hunt"
letter appeared at the same time are particularly intriguing in light of another
matter we are about to consider.
Both the "Hunt as a tramp" story and the "Dear Mr. Hunt" letter appear
to be part and parcel of a CIA black propaganda operation run by the
Mossad's man at the CIA, James J. Angleton.
HUNT WAS IN DALLAS
Ironically, as we shall see, the evidence suggests that E. Howard Hunt
was indeed in Dallas—on, at the very least, November 21, 1963—and very
much involved in strange activities in league with key players in the JFK
assassination scenario.
According to Marchetti, widespread public suspicion of CIA
involvement in the president's murder was forcing the CIA to play its hand
and "admit" that, in fact, one of its more notorious longtime operatives,
Hunt, had indeed been in Dallas on the day that Kennedy was killed.
Obviously, Hunt—with his well-known ties to the anti-Castro Cubans,
often considered prime suspects in the JFK assassination—would have a
difficult time explaining why he had been in Big D on that fateful day—if
indeed he had been.
Interesting, Marchetti's article never said that Hunt had, in fact, been
involved in the assassination conspiracy. Marchetti's article said only that
top-ranking CIA officials had decided to frame Hunt for the crime. Hunt,
according to Marchetti's sources, was deemed expendable.
Marchetti's article reported that a strange in-house CIA
memo—allegedly written some years previously—had somehow ended up
in the hands of investigators for the House Assassinations Committee and
that Hunt, as a consequence, would ultimately be forced to explain his
reported presence in Dallas (as described in the memo) on November 22,
1963.