Polynomial functions on Young diagrams arising from bipartite graphs

Polynomial functions on Young diagrams arising from bipartite graphs Polynomial functions on Young diagrams arising from bipartite graphs

01.06.2015 Views

260 Maciej Dołęga and Piotr Śniady (ii) J µ (α) is an α-anisotropic polynomial function on the set of Young diagrams, i.e. the function λ ↦→ ( 1 α λ) is a polynomial function; J (α) µ (iii) J (α) µ has degree equal to |µ| (regarded as a shifted symmetric function). The structure on Jack polynomials remains mysterious and there are several open problems concerning them. The most interesting for us are introduced and investigated by Lassalle (2008, 2009). One possible way to overcome these difficulties is to write Jack shifted symmetric ong>functionsong> in the form where n (α) π J (α) µ (λ) = ∑ π⊢|µ| n (α) π Σ (α) π (µ) Σ π (α) (λ), is some combinatorial factor which is out of scope of the current paper and where Σ (α) π , called Jack character, is an α-anisotropic polynomial function on the set of Young diagrams. The problem is therefore reduced to finding the expansion (1) for Jack characters (which is a special case of Problem 1.1). It is tempting to solve this problem by guessing the right form of the expansion (1) and then by proving that so defined J (α) µ have the required properties. We expect that verifying a weaker version of condition (i), namely: (i’) For each Young diagram λ such that |λ| < |µ| we have J (α) µ (λ) = 0 should not be too difficult; sometimes it does not matter if in the definition of N G (λ) we count all embeddings of the graph into the Young diagram or we count only injective embeddings in which each edge of the graph is mapped into a different box of λ. If this is the case then condition (i’) holds trivially if all graphs G over which we sum have exactly |µ| edges. Also condition (iii) would follow trivially. The true difficulty is to check that condition (ii) is fulfilled which is exactly the special case of Problem 1.2 (up to the small rescaling related to the fact that we are interested now with α-anisotropic polynomial ong>functionsong>). 1.6 The main result The main result of this paper is Theorem 5.1 which gives a solution to Problem 1.2 by characterizing the linear combinations of N G which are polynomial ong>functionsong> on Y in terms of a combinatorial property of the underlying formal linear combinations of bipartite graphs G. 1.7 Contents of this article In this article we shall highlight just the main ideas of the proof of Theorem 5.1 because the whole proof is rather long and technical. In particular we will briefly show the main conceptual ingredients: differential calculus on Y and derivation of bipartite graphs. Due to lack of space we were not able to show the full history of the presented results and to give to everybody the proper credits. For more history and bibliographical references we refer to the full version of this article Dołęga and Śniady (2010) which will be published elsewhere. 2 Preliminaries 2.1 Russian and French convention We will use two conventions for drawing Young diagrams: the French one in the 0xy coordinate system and the Russian one in the 0zt coordinate system (presented on Figure 1). Notice that the graphs in the

ong>Polynomialong> ong>functionsong> on Young diagrams 261 y 9 t t x 4 3 2 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 x y 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 1 2 3 4 5 z −3 −2 −1 1 2 3 z Fig. 1: Young diagram (4, 3, 1) shown in the French and Russian conventions. The solid line represents the profile of the Young diagram. The coordinates system (z, t) corresponding to the Russian convention and the coordinate system (x, y) corresponding to the French convention are shown. Russian convention are created from the graphs in the French convention by rotating counterclockwise by π 4 and by scaling by a factor √ 2. Alternatively, this can be viewed as choice of two coordinate systems on the plane: 0xy, corresponding to the French convention, and 0zt, corresponding to the Russian convention. For a point on the plane we will define its content as its z-coordinate. In the French coordinates will use the plane R 2 equipped with the standard Lebesgue measure, i.e. the area of a unit square with vertices (x, y) such that x, y ∈ {0, 1} is equal to 1. This measure in the Russian coordinates corresponds to a the Lebesgue measure on R 2 multiplied by the factor 2, i.e. i.e. the area of a unit square with vertices (z, t) such that z, t ∈ {0, 1} is equal to 2. 2.2 Generalized Young diagrams We can identify a Young diagram drawn in the Russian convention with its profile, see Figure 1. It is therefore natural to define the set of generalized Young diagrams Y (in the Russian convention) as the set of ong>functionsong> ω : R → R + which fulfill the following two conditions: • ω is a Lipschitz function with constant 1, i.e. |ω(z 1 ) − ω(z 2 )| ≤ |z 1 − z 2 |, • ω(z) = |z| if |z| is large enough. We will define the support of ω in a natural way: 2.3 Functionals of shape supp(ω) = {z ∈ R : ω(z) ≠ |z|}. We define the fundamental functionals of shape λ for integers k ≥ 2 ∫∫ S k (λ) = (k − 1) (x − y) k−2 dx dy = 1 ∫∫ 2 (k − 1) (x,y)∈λ (z,t)∈λ z k−2 dz dt, where the first integral is written in the French and the second in the Russian coordinates. The family (S k ) k≥2 generates the algebra P of polynomial ong>functionsong> on Young diagrams (Dołęga, Féray, and Śniady, 2010).

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Polynomial</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>functi<strong>on</strong>s</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Young</strong> <strong>diagrams</strong> 261<br />

y<br />

9<br />

t<br />

t<br />

x<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

x<br />

y<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

−5 −4 −3 −2 −1 1 2 3 4 5<br />

z<br />

−3 −2 −1 1 2 3<br />

z<br />

Fig. 1: <strong>Young</strong> diagram (4, 3, 1) shown in the French and Russian c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>s. The solid line represents the profile<br />

of the <strong>Young</strong> diagram. The coordinates system (z, t) corresp<strong>on</strong>ding to the Russian c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> and the coordinate<br />

system (x, y) corresp<strong>on</strong>ding to the French c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> are shown.<br />

Russian c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> are created <strong>from</strong> the <strong>graphs</strong> in the French c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> by rotating counterclockwise<br />

by π 4 and by scaling by a factor √ 2. Alternatively, this can be viewed as choice of two coordinate<br />

systems <strong>on</strong> the plane: 0xy, corresp<strong>on</strong>ding to the French c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>, and 0zt, corresp<strong>on</strong>ding to the Russian<br />

c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>. For a point <strong>on</strong> the plane we will define its c<strong>on</strong>tent as its z-coordinate.<br />

In the French coordinates will use the plane R 2 equipped with the standard Lebesgue measure, i.e. the<br />

area of a unit square with vertices (x, y) such that x, y ∈ {0, 1} is equal to 1. This measure in the Russian<br />

coordinates corresp<strong>on</strong>ds to a the Lebesgue measure <strong>on</strong> R 2 multiplied by the factor 2, i.e. i.e. the area of<br />

a unit square with vertices (z, t) such that z, t ∈ {0, 1} is equal to 2.<br />

2.2 Generalized <strong>Young</strong> <strong>diagrams</strong><br />

We can identify a <strong>Young</strong> diagram drawn in the Russian c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> with its profile, see Figure 1. It is<br />

therefore natural to define the set of generalized <strong>Young</strong> <strong>diagrams</strong> Y (in the Russian c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>) as the set<br />

of <str<strong>on</strong>g>functi<strong>on</strong>s</str<strong>on</strong>g> ω : R → R + which fulfill the following two c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s:<br />

• ω is a Lipschitz functi<strong>on</strong> with c<strong>on</strong>stant 1, i.e. |ω(z 1 ) − ω(z 2 )| ≤ |z 1 − z 2 |,<br />

• ω(z) = |z| if |z| is large enough.<br />

We will define the support of ω in a natural way:<br />

2.3 Functi<strong>on</strong>als of shape<br />

supp(ω) = {z ∈ R : ω(z) ≠ |z|}.<br />

We define the fundamental functi<strong>on</strong>als of shape λ for integers k ≥ 2<br />

∫∫<br />

S k (λ) = (k − 1) (x − y) k−2 dx dy = 1 ∫∫<br />

2 (k − 1)<br />

(x,y)∈λ<br />

(z,t)∈λ<br />

z k−2 dz dt,<br />

where the first integral is written in the French and the sec<strong>on</strong>d in the Russian coordinates. The family<br />

(S k ) k≥2 generates the algebra P of polynomial <str<strong>on</strong>g>functi<strong>on</strong>s</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Young</strong> <strong>diagrams</strong> (Dołęga, Féray, and Śniady,<br />

2010).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!