A Cultural Formulation Approach to Career ... - ResearchGate

A Cultural Formulation Approach to Career ... - ResearchGate A Cultural Formulation Approach to Career ... - ResearchGate

jivacareer.org
from jivacareer.org More from this publisher
31.05.2015 Views

476 Journal of Career Development 37(1) achieved status through characteristics such as age, family, name, reputation, and so on. The values important for individualistically focused individuals are freedom, honesty, social recognition, comfort, hedonism, and equity among group members. The main goal for persons from individualistic cultures is personal success, and various techniques such as contracts can be used to ensure that personal success is attained. For these individuals, status is defined by personal achievement and success (Triandis et al., 1988). Because of the value placed on face saving and maintaining harmony, Asian Americans may adopt a more indirect style of communication in counseling. Directly disagreeing with the counselor, for example, could cause the counselor to lose face or disrupt the therapeutic relationship. The client may therefore rely on more subtle and indirect forms of communication. Unfortunately, however, many career counselors with more individualistic values are unable to receive these indirect messages, which can result in misunderstandings. Frustration may also result when the counselor with individualist values misinterprets the client as being resistant or evasive (see Sue & Sue, 2008). Behaviors. Collectivist cultures spend most time demonstrating associative behaviors such as giving, helping, and supporting, but these behaviors are limited to members of the group only, and members outside the group can often be approached with distrust, hostility, and/or dissociation. Persons from individualistic cultures are more able and comfortable among strangers; they can function separate from the group and are able to independently get tasks accomplished. Neither construct suggests an advantage over the other. Each has certain benefits and disadvantages associated with the values, norms, attitudes, behaviors, and activities affiliated with each. Overall, there is a need for autonomy and independence among individualistically focused persons, whereas collectivistically oriented individuals have a stronger need for affiliation and nurturance (Hui & Villareal, 1987; Triandis et al., 1988). When working with an Asian American client, non Asian American career counselors may be approached with an initial distrust because they are a member of the out-group. Asian American clients’ very real experiences with discrimination and stereotyping may also make them initially distrustful of the therapeutic process, particularly if the counselor is a member of the dominant European American culture; therefore, career counselors should be prepared not to demonstrate their competence and trustworthiness by taking the time to build rapport with the client, respecting cultural differences, and directly acknowledging these differences and any barriers that might represent. In keeping with many Asian American clients’ preferences for indirect communication that maintains harmony and preserves face, the most effective approach may be to address issues of culture indirectly or hypothetically, for example by noting to clients that, ‘‘Sometimes when there are cultural differences between the client and counselor, it is not unusual for the client to have questions or concerns about how well the counselor understands the client’s 476 Downloaded from http://jcd.sagepub.com at MICHIGAN STATE UNIV LIBRARIES on May 19, 2010

Leong et al. 477 experience. I’m wondering how likely you think it is that such concerns might arise in our work together?’’ (cf. Sue & Sue, 2008). Overall Cultural Assessment for Career Counseling and Intervention The fifth dimension of the cultural formulations approach is Overall cultural assessment for career counseling and intervention. The overall cultural assessment involves integrating all of the cultural information into an integrated formulation, which draws from career assessment information and seeks to provide a culturally appropriate career counseling plan for the client. In this regard, Leong’s integrative model (1996b) of psychotherapy can provide some guidance in conducting this overall cultural assessment. In this model, Leong (1996b) began with a critique that the unidimensional nature of the major career development theories tend to constrain and confine the utility and relevance of career counseling services for minority group members, including Asian Americans, because they are based on an assumed universality. Leong’s (1996b) multidimensional and integrative model of cross-cultural counseling and psychotherapy used the tripartite framework of Kluckhohn and Murray (1950) and proposed that cross-cultural counselors and therapists need to attend to all three major dimensions of human personality and identity, namely the Universal, the Group, and the Individual dimensions. The Universal dimension is based on the knowledge-base generated by mainstream psychology and the ‘‘universal laws’’ of human behavior that have been identified (e.g., the universal ‘‘fight or flight’’ response in humans to physical threat). The Group dimension has been the domain of both cross-cultural psychology and ethnic minority psychology and the study of gender differences. The third and final dimension concerns unique Individual differences and characteristics. The Individual dimension is more often covered by behavioral and existential theories, where individual learning histories and personal phenomenology are proposed as critical elements in the understanding of human behavior. Leong’s (1996b) integrative model proposes that all three dimensions are equally important in understanding human experiences and should be attended to by the counselor in an integrative fashion. The integrative model of cross-cultural counseling proposed by Leong (1996b) has as one of its fundamental bases the notion that the individual client must exist at three levels, the Universal, the Group, and the Individual. The problem with much of the past research in the field of cross-cultural counseling is that the focus has been on only one of the three levels, ignoring the influence of the other levels in the counseling situation. Leong’s (1996b) integrative model includes all three dimensions of personality as well as their dynamic interactions, and thus will have better incremental validity than any model that only focuses on only one of the three levels. Incremental validity consists of greater variance of the criterion being predicted above and beyond the original set of variables. For example, factoring in a person’s race in addition to gender will increase our understanding of that person’s behavior with Downloaded from http://jcd.sagepub.com at MICHIGAN STATE UNIV LIBRARIES on May 19, 2010 477

Leong et al. 477<br />

experience. I’m wondering how likely you think it is that such concerns might arise<br />

in our work <strong>to</strong>gether?’’ (cf. Sue & Sue, 2008).<br />

Overall <strong>Cultural</strong> Assessment for <strong>Career</strong> Counseling and Intervention<br />

The fifth dimension of the cultural formulations approach is Overall cultural assessment<br />

for career counseling and intervention. The overall cultural assessment<br />

involves integrating all of the cultural information in<strong>to</strong> an integrated formulation,<br />

which draws from career assessment information and seeks <strong>to</strong> provide a culturally<br />

appropriate career counseling plan for the client. In this regard, Leong’s integrative<br />

model (1996b) of psychotherapy can provide some guidance in conducting this overall<br />

cultural assessment. In this model, Leong (1996b) began with a critique that the<br />

unidimensional nature of the major career development theories tend <strong>to</strong> constrain<br />

and confine the utility and relevance of career counseling services for minority<br />

group members, including Asian Americans, because they are based on an assumed<br />

universality.<br />

Leong’s (1996b) multidimensional and integrative model of cross-cultural counseling<br />

and psychotherapy used the tripartite framework of Kluckhohn and Murray<br />

(1950) and proposed that cross-cultural counselors and therapists need <strong>to</strong> attend <strong>to</strong><br />

all three major dimensions of human personality and identity, namely the Universal,<br />

the Group, and the Individual dimensions. The Universal dimension is based on the<br />

knowledge-base generated by mainstream psychology and the ‘‘universal laws’’ of<br />

human behavior that have been identified (e.g., the universal ‘‘fight or flight’’<br />

response in humans <strong>to</strong> physical threat). The Group dimension has been the domain<br />

of both cross-cultural psychology and ethnic minority psychology and the study of<br />

gender differences. The third and final dimension concerns unique Individual<br />

differences and characteristics. The Individual dimension is more often covered<br />

by behavioral and existential theories, where individual learning his<strong>to</strong>ries and personal<br />

phenomenology are proposed as critical elements in the understanding of<br />

human behavior. Leong’s (1996b) integrative model proposes that all three dimensions<br />

are equally important in understanding human experiences and should be<br />

attended <strong>to</strong> by the counselor in an integrative fashion.<br />

The integrative model of cross-cultural counseling proposed by Leong (1996b)<br />

has as one of its fundamental bases the notion that the individual client must exist<br />

at three levels, the Universal, the Group, and the Individual. The problem with much<br />

of the past research in the field of cross-cultural counseling is that the focus has been<br />

on only one of the three levels, ignoring the influence of the other levels in the counseling<br />

situation. Leong’s (1996b) integrative model includes all three dimensions of<br />

personality as well as their dynamic interactions, and thus will have better incremental<br />

validity than any model that only focuses on only one of the three levels. Incremental<br />

validity consists of greater variance of the criterion being predicted above<br />

and beyond the original set of variables. For example, fac<strong>to</strong>ring in a person’s race<br />

in addition <strong>to</strong> gender will increase our understanding of that person’s behavior with<br />

Downloaded from http://jcd.sagepub.com at MICHIGAN STATE UNIV LIBRARIES on May 19, 2010<br />

477

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!