28.05.2015 Views

Research Week Abstract Book - Northern Health

Research Week Abstract Book - Northern Health

Research Week Abstract Book - Northern Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Women’s <strong>Health</strong> and Paediatrics<br />

CRP VERSUS I/T RATIO IN SUSPECTED NEONATAL SEPsis<br />

De Silva M, Fan WQ.<br />

The Department of Paediatrics, <strong>Northern</strong> Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.<br />

Background:<br />

The management of neonatal sepsis is difficult because clinical presentations are non-specific, and laboratory testing lacks<br />

sensitivity and specificity. This retrospective study evaluates the use and effectiveness of C-reactive protein (CRP) and<br />

immature: total neutrophil ratio (I/T-ratio) as markers of the status of neonatal infection during antibiotic therapy.<br />

Methods:<br />

Retrospective patient data (n= 136) was collected on neonates of gestational age 33- 42 weeks admitted to The <strong>Northern</strong><br />

Hospital special care nursery (SCN) for suspected neonatal sepsis treated with at least 2 days of IV antibiotics from<br />

September 2010 to August 2011. Data included: maternal risk factors, neonatal risk factors, clinical signs of neonatal infection<br />

and outcomes, CRP (measured via the turbidimetric method) and I/T-ratios (raised CRP >8.0mg/L; I/T-ratio > 0.2). The<br />

cohort was divided into clinically well and unwell subgroups. For paired data , CRP and I/T-ratio were compared statistically<br />

(well n=35, unwell n=80). Regression analysis was performed on CRP and I/T-ratio versus antibiotic duration (well n=42,<br />

unwell n=94).<br />

Results:<br />

More than 40% of all paired CRP and I/T-ratio data signaled opposite infection status. In the unwell group the paired data<br />

was significantly discordant (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!