Research Week Abstract Book - Northern Health
Research Week Abstract Book - Northern Health
Research Week Abstract Book - Northern Health
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Women’s <strong>Health</strong> and Paediatrics<br />
PROMOTinG CUE BASED FEEDING PRACTICE ThrouGH The IMPLEMENTATION<br />
of A Cue BASED FEEDinG CHART<br />
Naughton C & O’Callaghan A.<br />
Background<br />
Accurate feeding documentation in Special Care Nursery is essential to intervention and discharge planning. The current<br />
Special Care Nursery Feed Chart (IP 720) records feeding progress through the comparison of volumes taken orally over<br />
successive days. This information is subjective. There is no scale or agreed terminology used to classify or rate feeds.<br />
Finally, discharge based on the information in the current feed chart is a clinical risk due to the omission of information<br />
regarding the quality of the feeding and the caregiver strategies required.<br />
Aim<br />
To profile the limitations of the Special Care Nursery Feed Chart (IP 720). This information will be used to revise the chart with<br />
the goal to identify and include an objective feeding rating scale 3 .<br />
Methodology<br />
A documentation audit was conducted with the IP720. Audit criteria were developed in line with developmental care<br />
recommendations 4 and cue based feeding 1 . Ten preterm infants born less than 32 weeks GA with birth weights less than<br />
2000g were selected. 162 feeds were audited. The audit spanned the entire admission.<br />
Results<br />
The quality of feeds was only evident in 45.5% of the audits. Comments were subjective descriptions such as “sucked fairly”.<br />
Feeding cues were documented in 0.02% cases. Of the 162 feeds audited 0% included caregiver strategies.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Results identified the current feeding chart omits information regarding quality of feeding, feeding cues, and caregiver<br />
strategies. Description of feeding quality is subjective and lacks clinical evaluation. Intervention and discharge planning based<br />
on information in the current feed chart is a clinical risk.<br />
38<br />
<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Week</strong> <strong>Abstract</strong> <strong>Book</strong> <strong>Northern</strong> <strong>Health</strong> 2013