16.11.2012 Views

Matoza et al St. Helens Infrasound JGR 09

Matoza et al St. Helens Infrasound JGR 09

Matoza et al St. Helens Infrasound JGR 09

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

B04305 MATOZA ET AL.: INFRASOUND FROM LPS AT MOUNT ST. HELENS<br />

Figure 11. Source time functions used in this study. (top) Arbitrary pulse-like source time function used<br />

with an isotropic moment tensor. (middle) Crack source time function from Waite <strong>et</strong> <strong>al</strong>. [2008] and<br />

corresponding moment tensor components rotated into our coordinate system. (bottom) Vertic<strong>al</strong> singleforce<br />

component from Waite <strong>et</strong> <strong>al</strong>. [2008].<br />

limitations of this assumption by considering the seismoacoustic<br />

wavefield resulting from an extended fluid-filled<br />

crack source.<br />

4.2. Results<br />

4.2.1. Wavefield <strong>St</strong>ructure From 2-D Simulation<br />

[41] The acoustic wavefield structure resulting from an<br />

impulsive sh<strong>al</strong>low buried source is best illustrated in the 2-<br />

D simulation results of Figures 10, 12, and 13 (see <strong>al</strong>so<br />

Movie S1). Two distinct acoustic arriv<strong>al</strong>s result from this<br />

source configuration, in gener<strong>al</strong> agreement with the observations<br />

of Le Pichon <strong>et</strong> <strong>al</strong>. [2002, 2003], Mutschlecner and<br />

Whitaker [2005], and Sylvander <strong>et</strong> <strong>al</strong>. [2007]. The first<br />

corresponds to loc<strong>al</strong>ly converted P/SV and Rayleigh wave<br />

energy (identified by particle motion an<strong>al</strong>ysis, see Figure<br />

S4), and travels <strong>al</strong>ong the ground surface at seismic velocity,<br />

arriving at the infrasonic sensor coincident with the<br />

seismic energy. Note in Figure 10 how the wavefronts in the<br />

atmosphere form at a sh<strong>al</strong>low angle (dependent on elastic<br />

wave speed) to the topography surface and that amplitude<br />

increases <strong>al</strong>ong the wavefront in the direction away from the<br />

solid-fluid boundary, as this energy has left the solid at a<br />

later time. These properties are the same as those of ‘‘leaky<br />

waves’’ [Brekhovskikh, 1980; Viktorov, 1967] that form at a<br />

solid-fluid boundary when the elastic wave speed is higher<br />

than the sound speed in the fluid.<br />

[42] The second arriv<strong>al</strong> corresponds to energy converted<br />

in the vicinity of the source epicenter, and travels <strong>al</strong>ong the<br />

Figure 12. (left) r v and (right) (r v) y of the vector velocity field v for the simulation shown in<br />

Figure 10. From top to bottom, snapshots times are 0.1 s, 1 s, and 3 s. r v illustrates P and Rayleigh<br />

wave propagation, while (r v) y illustrates S and Rayleigh waves. Conversion of upward P to<br />

downward SV is seen at the free surface, while loc<strong>al</strong> seismic-acoustic conversion is seen for both P and<br />

Rayleigh waves leaving the source. Apparent rotation<strong>al</strong> components traveling at acoustic velocity in the<br />

atmosphere and P velocity in the elastic solid for (r v) y (right) are artifacts of high-frequency<br />

numeric<strong>al</strong> noise (curl does not precisely vanish).<br />

17 of 38<br />

B04305

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!