Sachin W Joshi Redesign of S Series (30-62.5 kVA) G ... - Cummins
Sachin W Joshi Redesign of S Series (30-62.5 kVA) G ... - Cummins
Sachin W Joshi Redesign of S Series (30-62.5 kVA) G ... - Cummins
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Sachin</strong> W <strong>Joshi</strong><br />
<strong>Redesign</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
S <strong>Series</strong> (<strong>30</strong>-<strong>62.5</strong> <strong>kVA</strong>)<br />
G Drive Skids for<br />
Improved Logistics
DFSS Project Overview<br />
Project Name:<br />
Sponsor:<br />
DFSS MBB:<br />
<strong>Redesign</strong> <strong>of</strong> S <strong>Series</strong> (<strong>30</strong>-<strong>62.5</strong> <strong>kVA</strong>) G Drive<br />
Skids for “improved logistics”.<br />
Ashwath Ram<br />
Abhijit Phadke<br />
Project Duration: 183 Days<br />
Benefits: (i) Annualized Pr<strong>of</strong>it Improvement $139,000<br />
(ii) Annualized savings<br />
(PBIT + Avoidance) $231,000<br />
(iii) Spin <strong>of</strong>f Project (Identified) $ 228,000<br />
2
Background<br />
6000<br />
5000<br />
4000<br />
<strong>30</strong>00<br />
2000<br />
1000<br />
0<br />
2008 2009 2010 2011<br />
S <strong>Series</strong> G drive AOP achieved<br />
46%<br />
12% reduction in<br />
Domestic<br />
volumes in 09<br />
Domestic<br />
Export<br />
62% reduction<br />
in Export volumes<br />
in 09<br />
Out Bound<br />
Metal Skid Spend<br />
is $ 167 K<br />
54%<br />
Break up <strong>of</strong> Metal skid purchases<br />
in 2008 ($ 364 K) (Sept 07 – Aug 08)<br />
The writing was on the wall early<br />
Quarter 4 2008 that 2009 would be<br />
a difficult year due to the recession.<br />
CPGI business in India will be<br />
affected so would CPG globally.<br />
Maintaining our pr<strong>of</strong>itability was<br />
therefore the top most priority as<br />
was evident from the messages<br />
from the CPG Leadership.<br />
Skid procurement in CPGI and its<br />
logistics is an "expense” in the<br />
books and has a direct impact on<br />
the pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> the CPGI entity<br />
and this project is an attempt to<br />
minimize this.<br />
S <strong>Series</strong> was picked as a Pilot case<br />
to be further deployed horizontally<br />
to other Models as 60% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
outbound skid purchases in 2008<br />
was on S series.<br />
3
Relevance to Business<br />
S <strong>Series</strong> (<strong>30</strong>-<strong>62.5</strong> <strong>kVA</strong>) G Drives shipment to GOEMs<br />
and Skid return to PGBU<br />
From<br />
To<br />
GOEMs<br />
Cost per<br />
skid=$ 206<br />
Cost per<br />
skid = $ 60<br />
CPGI<br />
Daman<br />
Variety <strong>of</strong><br />
Skids<br />
Universal<br />
Skid<br />
Bangalore,<br />
Silvasa<br />
Skid<br />
return<br />
(10 per<br />
Vehicle)<br />
Skid<br />
return<br />
(60 per<br />
vehicle)<br />
Pirangut<br />
Plant India<br />
Daman<br />
0% Customer<br />
(GOEM)<br />
owned Skids<br />
50%<br />
customer<br />
(GOEM)<br />
owned Skids<br />
Temporary storage at GOEM Plants.<br />
Returned when a G drive is assembled.<br />
4
Current Status<br />
2008 (Actual)<br />
2009 (Actual)<br />
S <strong>Series</strong> AOP Shipment<br />
5352 (Achieved)<br />
4729 (Achieved)<br />
12%<br />
No <strong>of</strong> Types <strong>of</strong> Skids<br />
2<br />
1<br />
50%<br />
Cost/ Skid<br />
206<br />
60<br />
70%<br />
Skid Expense Value<br />
USD 94K<br />
USD 19K<br />
80%<br />
GOEM Ownership<br />
0<br />
50%<br />
50%<br />
Logistics Cost<br />
10/ Vehicle (MCV)<br />
10K<br />
Gross Margin<br />
(S <strong>Series</strong> Domestic)<br />
34%<br />
5
Savings: Reduction in Expense<br />
1 USD = 47 INR Planned Old Actual Old New Planned Old Actual Old<br />
6<br />
S series Gross Margin 34%<br />
1. Reduction <strong>of</strong> $ 102 K in Skid procurement.<br />
This includes skids purchased by GOEMs.<br />
2. Reduction <strong>of</strong> Expense on Logistics cost by $ 10K.
Project Objective / CFR / Y=f(x):<br />
Skid Design = f (Total load, Skid Life, skid handling)<br />
7
DFSS Work Flow<br />
Planned<br />
In Process<br />
Results Available<br />
8
Concept Phase<br />
KJ<br />
Customer Requirements<br />
P Diagram<br />
Stackable design<br />
(Strong and durable design)<br />
Universal Design<br />
Reduced Size, No Transit Damages<br />
(Strong and durable design)<br />
9<br />
GOEM Requirement<br />
CPGI Requirement<br />
Reduced Cost to introduce Customer owned skids.<br />
Manufacture in-houseif necessary.<br />
More Numbers <strong>of</strong> empty skids per<br />
truck (Less volume). Less no. <strong>of</strong> Trips<br />
to CPGI. On time delivery.
Design Approach<br />
<strong>Cummins</strong> Designed creative Innovation tool used to<br />
clarify Contradictions in Customer Requirements –<br />
1. A strong skid that has ease <strong>of</strong> manufacturability<br />
2. A strong skid occupying less volume.<br />
3. A durable skid that causes no transit damages<br />
to the fragile G Drive components.<br />
10
11<br />
Design Phase
CPM Score Card<br />
Meets all the<br />
load cases<br />
CGI = 85%<br />
The design allows the Skid Material to be Loaded<br />
within its tensile limit under all Load cases.<br />
12
Universal Design for G Drive<br />
and Vehicle Verified<br />
<strong>30</strong>-<strong>62.5</strong> <strong>kVA</strong><br />
RIGHT FIRST TIME<br />
The vehicle is not a<br />
controlled factor any more.<br />
One skid for all engines<br />
from <strong>30</strong>-<strong>62.5</strong> <strong>kVA</strong> G Drives<br />
<strong>30</strong> KVA<br />
<strong>62.5</strong> KVA<br />
The design <strong>of</strong> the skid is<br />
COMMON for all 6 Engine<br />
Models. And also COMMON<br />
for LCV and a MCV truck.<br />
13
Reduction in Return Trips to CPGI with<br />
Improved Safety Levels in Transit and Handling<br />
Old: Unsafe & Unstable<br />
New: Safe & Stable<br />
14
Partnering with Customers<br />
Proportion <strong>of</strong> Skid share<br />
11.5%<br />
Category<br />
CIL<br />
Powerica<br />
Sudhir<br />
Jakson<br />
11.5%<br />
48.1%<br />
28.8%<br />
Customers ( GOEMs) partner with CPGI to<br />
purchase skids from Vendor directly. Progress<br />
reviewed in every GOEM Council.<br />
15
Long Term Sustenance – Tracker<br />
Skid recirculation tracker reports<br />
– daily skid returns<br />
– stocks at GOEMs on a monthly basis<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
Old<br />
New<br />
'Nov 09 'Dec 09<br />
100% phase over in Jan 2010<br />
16
The Extra Mile…<br />
The new design made the old<br />
skids redundant. How do we<br />
utilize the redundant skids?<br />
– Made presentations to the<br />
Genset OEMs in the monthly<br />
review councils on storage<br />
ability <strong>of</strong> the old design. One <strong>of</strong><br />
the OEM purchased 100 skids.<br />
17
Summary<br />
2009 S series Sales 12% i<br />
2009 S series Gross Margin 34% i<br />
(Domestic)<br />
Skid cost reduced by 85%<br />
Logistics cost reduced by $ 10K<br />
Introduced Customer (GOEMs) owned skids<br />
Customer (GOEMs) buy old stock for internal storage.<br />
Spin <strong>of</strong>f project identified for Horizontal deployment<br />
Spin <strong>of</strong>f project to prevent annual use <strong>of</strong> $228 K<br />
outbound wooden skids in B <strong>Series</strong> Identified.<br />
18