Uttarakhand - Department of Land Resources

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Annexure Table 2.4: Status of Degraded Land in the State - Area in 000' ha. Sl. no. Districts Gullied Land Land With or Without scrubs Water logged/ marshy land Saline and alkaline area Degraded notified forest land Degraded pasture/ grazing land Degraded land under plantation Sand/ Coastal Land Mining/ Industrial area Barren rocky area Steep slping area Snow/ glacier area Total Geographi wastelands/d cal area egraded land % of the total geographical area 1 2 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 14.00 15.00 16.00 17 1 Almora 0.00 1.16 0.00 0.00 1.94 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.60 1.99 0.74 7.62 313.40 6% 2 Bageshwar 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 1.58 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.31 1.82 50.38 55.43 225.00 4% 3 Chamoli 0.00 1.03 0.00 0.00 12.12 4.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.84 6.19 423.89 449.26 912.50 17% 4 Rudraprayag 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 5 Champawat 0.00 0.90 0.00 0.00 7.41 0.44 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.29 1.55 11.02 176.60 3% 6 Dehradun 0.06 12.12 0.00 0.00 14.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39.93 0.00 66.14 308.80 6% 7 Haridwar 1.52 3.96 2.99 0.00 28.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.08 199.50 4% 8 Naintal 0.00 1.91 0.22 0.00 14.68 0.06 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.38 1.13 0.56 19.34 421.60 8% 9 Pauri Garhwal 0.00 0.02 1.17 0.00 5.55 2.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67 14.61 0.27 24.72 544.00 10% 10 Pithoragarh 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 2.06 1.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.22 7.14 375.93 414.11 709.10 13% 11 Tehri Garhwal 0.00 0.99 0.02 0.00 6.42 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.80 10.49 34.89 56.04 442.10 8% 12 Udham Singh Nagar 0.00 1.55 2.37 0.00 6.34 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.69 257.90 5% 13 Uttarkashi 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 8.05 1.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.72 13.04 428.43 456.43 801.60 15% Total 1.59 24.02 6.76 0.00 108.81 11.64 1.02 0.00 0.00 40.79 96.62 1316.64 1607.88 5312.10 100% Source - Watershed Atlas of India (2000). Dept of land Resource and NRSA Table 2.4
Annexure Table 2.5: Extent of Soil Erosion in the State Class Range of Soil loss (t/ha/yr.) Area (Lakh ha.) Area (%) Very Slight < 5 2.80 Slight 5 - 10 5 Moderate 10 - 15 8.39 16 Severe 20 - 40 16.45 31 Very Severe 40 - 80 11.92 22 Extremely severe > 80 1.51 3 41.07 77 Snow Covered 5.70 11 Rockey 4.09 8 Not Serveyed 2.43 5 GRAND TOTAL 53.29 Source : Land Survey Directorate, Uttarakhand Table 2.5
Page 1 and 2:
Uttarakhand State Perspective and S
Page 3 and 4:
Chapter-3 - Status of Rainfed Areas
Page 5 and 6:
UTTARAKHAND STATE PERSPECTIVE AND S
Page 7 and 8:
2. Enhancing Livelihood Opportuniti
Page 9 and 10:
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AWP APMC BPL
Page 11 and 12:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Uttarakhand
Page 13 and 14:
The State supports about 4.75 milli
Page 15 and 16:
1. Participatory Watershed Developm
Page 17 and 18:
ii. Almora iii. Pithoragarh iv. Cha
Page 19 and 20:
iv. Trans-Himalayas: Also known as
Page 21 and 22:
LAND USE Like most other hill econo
Page 23 and 24:
kharak and Satopanth glaciers. The
Page 25 and 26:
5 Tehri 134 4,14,588 6 Rudraprayag
Page 27 and 28:
IRRIGATION STATUS As mentioned earl
Page 29 and 30:
AGRICULTURAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
Page 31 and 32:
As per (Annexure Table 2.8) the cro
Page 33 and 34:
Herbal and Medicinal plants : Uttar
Page 35 and 36:
Major forest types occurring in the
Page 37 and 38:
alance study has been conducted in
Page 39 and 40:
Uttarakhand. The Company targets a
Page 41 and 42:
Payment for ecosystem services: The
Page 43 and 44:
consumption. Sheep are held in larg
Page 45 and 46:
Natural lakes: Uttarakhand is havin
Page 47 and 48:
selling of agricultural produce and
Page 49 and 50:
Micro Credit : The State of Uttarak
Page 51 and 52:
Champawat, Dehradun, Pauri Garhwal,
Page 53 and 54:
The district which are having high
Page 55 and 56:
Uttarakhand has about 13 percent of
Page 57 and 58:
star if developed. The Delhi market
Page 59 and 60:
Weakness: Lack of sub-reg
Page 61 and 62:
products can be prepared from these
Page 63 and 64:
4. Irrigation facilities are poor -
Page 65 and 66:
ANALYSIS OF ISSUES IN LIVESTOCK MAN
Page 67 and 68:
The forests cover 63.44 percent of
Page 69 and 70:
parts of the state. So there is a n
Page 71 and 72:
staples. Traditionally in the Himal
Page 73 and 74:
culture of carps in the plain distr
Page 75 and 76:
Cooperatives: The objective of orga
Page 77 and 78:
Rating of SHGs is an important requ
Page 79 and 80:
For planning of marketing strategie
Page 81 and 82:
Exhibit-3-VI- Focus issues in Agri
Page 83 and 84:
7. Developing of farm equipment /ma
Page 85 and 86:
Exhibit 3-VII Agriculture Extension
Page 87 and 88:
Even though such an infrastructure
Page 89 and 90:
The maintenance of roads as per the
Page 91 and 92:
the agricultural sector. Profession
Page 93 and 94:
CHAPTER - 4 MAJOR PROGRAMS / SCHEME
Page 95 and 96:
watershed basis are being sanctione
Page 97 and 98:
ANALYSIS OF VARIOUS PROGRAMS/ SCHEM
Page 99 and 100:
people. Not all focus group members
Page 101 and 102:
The overall aims and objectives of
Page 103 and 104:
Project objective of regenerating e
Page 105 and 106:
conservation. Similarly, analysis o
Page 107 and 108:
5. The number of people provided la
Page 109 and 110:
CHAPTER - 5 ISSUES AND CHALLENGES T
Page 111 and 112:
Thus the main issues which need to
Page 113 and 114:
possible impacts on natural resourc
Page 115 and 116:
The fact is that the fodder crisis
Page 117 and 118:
already constrained due to mountain
Page 119 and 120:
strategies has to be shifted toward
Page 121 and 122:
CHAPTER - 6 VISION AND MISSION Utta
Page 123 and 124:
CHAPTER -7 PERSPECTIVE NEED FOR PER
Page 125 and 126:
Out of the 537 untreated MWS, 409 m
Page 127 and 128:
financial autonomy in implementing
Page 129 and 130:
Drainage line treatment is essentia
Page 131 and 132:
Integrated pest & disease managemen
Page 133 and 134:
If reduces the application of pesti
Page 135 and 136:
source of the people. The project h
Page 137 and 138:
stall-fed goats consume any fodder,
Page 139 and 140:
opportunities for vulnerable famili
Page 141 and 142:
encouraged, enabled and augmented w
Page 143 and 144:
holder of the community. The follow
Page 145 and 146:
Step Activity Purpose Finding an o
Page 147 and 148:
(Table 7- g) - MITIGATION MEASURES
Page 149 and 150:
AGRICULTURE 1. High Yielding Variet
Page 151 and 152:
HORTICULTURE 1. Fruit Crops 2. Medi
Page 153:
Social Mobilization / Formation of
Page 157 and 158: The SLNA consists of one representa
Page 159 and 160: The arrangements for setting up/ st
Page 161 and 162: Should be a registered legal entity
Page 163 and 164: Roles and responsibilities of WDT:
Page 165 and 166: Signing the cheques jointly with th
Page 167 and 168: S. No. 4. Van Panchayat Institution
Page 169 and 170: S. No. Institution Composition Role
Page 171 and 172: Garhwal University; Kumaon Universi
Page 173 and 174: IV Development of Village Watershed
Page 175 and 176: The WC shall make sure that the GPW
Page 177 and 178: Income generating activities for vu
Page 179 and 180: Take stock of the needs of the comm
Page 181 and 182: ‣ Quality and marketability of th
Page 183 and 184: XV Review and appraisal of GPWDP: W
Page 185 and 186: Reimbursement of Cost of Works: Dur
Page 187 and 188: ‣ In case of special technical re
Page 189 and 190: Particulars (Table 8-e.)- Fund flow
Page 191 and 192: Target Group Transhumant communitie
Page 193 and 194: CHAPTER -9 OUTPUT AND OUTCOME INDIC
Page 195 and 196: Objective Outcome Indicators Use of
Page 197 and 198: Target Values Target Values Outcome
Page 199 and 200: Target Values Target Values Outcome
Page 201 and 202: 189
Page 203 and 204: Annexure Table 2.1: General Informa
Page 205: Annexure Table 2.3: Normal rainfall
Page 209 and 210: Annexure Table 2.7: Source wise Inc
Page 211 and 212: Annexure Table 2.9: Land holdings (
Page 213 and 214: Annexure Table 2.11: Area, Producti
Page 215 and 216: Sl.no Districts Crops Area (ha.) Pr
Page 217 and 218: Annexure Table 2.14: Source wise Ar
Page 219 and 220: Annexure Table 2.15 (b): Details of
Page 221 and 222: Annexure Table 2.17: Milk Populatio
Page 223 and 224: Annexure Table 2.19: Detials of Cre
Page 225 and 226: Annexure Table 2.21: Basic Marketin
Page 227 and 228: Annexure Table 4.1: Watershed Devel
Page 229 and 230: Table 8.1: Agro-Climatic zone wise
Page 231 and 232: Table 8.2(b): Annual Plan /Cost Tab
Page 233 and 234: Sl.no District Annexure Table 8.3:
Page 235 and 236: Criteria for exclusion of sub-proje
Page 237 and 238: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT
Page 239 and 240: Sl. No 30 Project activities Small
Page 241 and 242: APPENDIX -4 Format for Gram panchay
Page 243 and 244: FORMAT FOR PREPARATION OF ESTIMATES
Page 247 and 248: MWS of Almora district with its wei
Page 249 and 250: MWS of Chamoli district with its we
Page 251 and 252: MWS of Champawat district with its
Page 253 and 254: MWS of Nainital district with its w
Page 255 and 256: Sl. No. DISTRI CT SWS MWS Clust App
Page 257 and 258:
MWS of Pithoragarh district with it
Page 259 and 260:
MWS of Tehri Garhwal district with
Page 261 and 262:
MWS of Udham Singh Nagar district w
Page 263 and 264:
Sl. No. DISTRICT SWS MWS Clust Appr
Page 265:
LIST OF MAPS MAP-1- Map showing Dis
Page 288:
WATERSHED MANAGEMENT DIRECTORATE UT
show all

Uttarakhand - Department of Land Resources

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?