2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...
2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...
2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> Lowlands Restoration <strong>Monitoring</strong><br />
<strong>2008</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
Discussion<br />
Considerable variability in the infaunal invertebrate community was recorded by the coring work.<br />
Patchiness is an established characteristic of benthic invertebrate communities. Most marine<br />
invertebrates are rapid colonizers, with community composition being driven by sediment<br />
characteristics and the frequency and spatial scale of disturbances (Thrush et al. 1996, Levin and<br />
Talley 2002). The variability see in invertebrate abundance and biomass through time and across<br />
stations in <strong>2008</strong> can be attributed to an uneven distribution of food or other resources, subtle substrate<br />
differences, or localized environmental impacts within a community. During the sediment core<br />
collection, considerable variability in sediment type was noted within stations, with some having a<br />
hard clay component, others with clean sand, and others composed of very soft muds. Additionally,<br />
the monitoring program was not conducted at a frequency capable of identifying seasonal patterns or<br />
with enough replication to detect directional trends amidst the high variability within station<br />
elevations.<br />
However, the two sampling events during the second year post-restoration did serve to document that<br />
the creation of the FTB has provided benthic food resources available to birds, fish, and other<br />
invertebrates. The created basin was quickly colonized by polychaetes, amphipods, tanaids, bivalves,<br />
and gastropods. Similar trends were seen at Batiquitos Lagoon following the introduction of marine<br />
influence to the wetland, which was quickly dominated in both density and biomass by molluscs<br />
(gastropods and bivalves), annelids (primarily polychaetes), and arthropods (primarily crustaceans)<br />
(M&A 2009). Benthic monitoring conducted during the comparable second year post-restoration at<br />
Batiquitos Lagoon (1998) found the mean density of all infauna at the –2-foot elevation to be 3,518<br />
indiv./m 2 in January and 3,020 indiv./m 2 in July, and at the +1-foot elevation to be 2,265 indiv./m 2 in<br />
January and 2,321 indiv./m 2 in July (Merkel & Associates 2009). The mean densities found at <strong>Bolsa</strong><br />
<strong>Chica</strong> in <strong>2008</strong> were within the same order of magnitude, with a density at the –2-foot elevation of<br />
6,365 indiv./m 2 in January and 3,540 indiv./m 2 in July, and at the +1-foot elevation a mean density of<br />
2,172 indiv./m 2 in January and 8,562 indiv./m 2 in July. This suggests infaunal density is not falling<br />
short after the second year post-restoration.<br />
The FTB experienced considerable tidal muting during the first two years post-restoration, with its<br />
ability to drain at low tides increasingly hampered over time by the accumulation of the anticipated<br />
sand shoal in the inlet (see Appendix 2-A). This had the effect of increasing the inundation period at a<br />
given elevation, so that by the end of <strong>2008</strong>, the +1-foot elevation was exposed much less frequently at<br />
low tides. This inundation shift probably had an effect on the invertebrate community that could not<br />
be detected by the limited sampling program, but likely influenced the distribution of fauna<br />
elevationally. Following maintenance dredging scheduled for 2009, the tidal range will rapidly be<br />
restored and subject the infaunal community to a less gradual shift in tidal elevation. The benthic<br />
community is anticipated to respond quickly, re-establishing at the elevations with the appropriate<br />
inundation conditions for their environmental tolerances. Although the response of the benthic<br />
community to tidal muting is not monitored, it should additionally be kept in mind when considering<br />
the variability between stations and seasons.<br />
The lack of lower level taxonomic data makes it impossible to compare the relative health of the FTB<br />
benthic communities with some popular indices (e.g., Index of Biotic Integrity, Benthic Response<br />
Index) to local reference standards. However, the basic goal of the sampling program was met;<br />
monitoring allowed documentation of the conversion of the basin to a tidally influenced bay capable of<br />
supporting a substantial prey base of infauna for marine fish and birds present in the basin.<br />
Merkel & Associates, Inc. 65