2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...
2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...
2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> Lowlands Restoration <strong>Monitoring</strong><br />
<strong>2008</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
As shown in Figure 2-23, subaerial volume losses prevailed after January 2007 at the two downcoast<br />
transects nearest the entrance channel (333+30 and 350+71). Because this period followed the opening<br />
of the entrance channel, particular vigilance is warranted at this site during future monitoring activities.<br />
The remaining downcoast sites were relatively stable during this period. (Note: It is not possible to<br />
assess the shorezone volume changes for the <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> <strong>Monitoring</strong> period because the October 2005<br />
profile does not extend below the waterline).<br />
Sediment Trapping in the Full Tidal Basin: As indicated in Section 2.1, approximately 158,000 m 3 of<br />
sediment was deposited in the lagoon during the 17-month period between August 2006 and January<br />
<strong>2008</strong>. Sedimentation was reduced substantially during the second year (11-month period between<br />
January <strong>2008</strong> to December <strong>2008</strong>) to approximately 46,000 m 3 . While a small fraction of this material<br />
may have resulted from redistribution of basin sediments or aeolian processes, nearly all of the<br />
sediment has entered the basin from the ocean. It is possible that the high shoaling rate during the first<br />
year was a transient effect attributable to inlet stabilization, and increased propensity for sedimentation<br />
due to the proximately of the pre-filled ebb bar and widened beaches adjacent to the inlet. The reduced<br />
shoaling rate during the second year is likely attributable to a reduced tidal prism due to infilling of the<br />
FTB and the stabilization of the aforementioned local sediment sources (nourished beaches and ebb<br />
bar).<br />
The shoaling rate measured during the initial 17-month period was on the same order of magnitude as<br />
the alongshore sediment transport rates developed as part of the CCSTWS-OC sediment budgets<br />
(estimated to range from 108,000 m 3 /y to 125,000 m 3 /y). As a result, particular attention is warranted<br />
in monitoring the flood shoal accumulation rates following the maintenance dredging in early 2009 to<br />
understand if the initial sedimentation was transitory or should be expected following future dredging<br />
episodes.<br />
In the event that trapping rates detected during the initial post-opening are not transitory, these rates<br />
are of a significant magnitude to be of major concern to longshore transport in the littoral cell. If left<br />
unchecked and unmanaged, the primary implication of a substantial reduction of the longshore<br />
sediment supply is shoreline erosion downdrift of the entrance channel. The <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> project,<br />
however, incorporates two sand management measures to actively address the potential for downdrift<br />
erosion by eliminating or substantially reducing the net long-term loss of sand downcoast. To<br />
compensate for anticipated short-term sediment losses from the littoral budget due to the natural<br />
formation of an ebb bar, initial lagoon shoaling, and fillet formation along the jetties, the ebb bar<br />
located offshore of the entrance channel was pre-filled, and supplemental sand was placed as beach<br />
nourishment adjacent to the channel at the time of construction. These pre-fills were intended to<br />
minimize littoral sand loss to ebb bar formation and provide supplemental sand for early inlet<br />
stabilization. In addition, the long-term project sediment management plan provides for periodic<br />
down-coast beach nourishment using sediment derived from the FTB during maintenance dredging<br />
operations. This bypassing operation essentially restores the sediment lost from the littoral budget to<br />
the downdrift beaches over the long-term. Taken together, these measures are anticipated to maintain<br />
the historical supply of sediment to the beaches located south of the entrance channel. The first such<br />
maintenance dredging will be conducted in early 2009.<br />
Merkel & Associates, Inc. 135