2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...
2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...
2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> Lowlands Restoration <strong>Monitoring</strong><br />
<strong>2008</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
downcoast. To compensate for anticipated short-term sediment losses from the littoral budget due to<br />
the natural formation of an ebb bar, initial lagoon shoaling, and fillet formation along the jetties, the<br />
ebb bar located offshore of the entrance channel was pre-filled, and supplemental sand was placed as<br />
beach nourishment adjacent to the channel at the time of construction. These pre-fills were intended to<br />
minimize littoral sand loss to ebb bar formation and provide supplemental sand for early inlet<br />
stabilization. In addition, the long-term project sediment management plan provides for periodic<br />
down-coast beach nourishment using sediment derived from the FTB during maintenance dredging<br />
operations, restoring the sediment lost from the littoral budget to the downdrift beaches.<br />
MAINTENANCE DREDGING AND DREDGING TRIGGERS<br />
Parameters of tidal muting, beach width, loss of subtidal habitat, closure risk, muted tidal basin<br />
function, and water quality were analyzed to evaluate the functioning of the system and determine<br />
when dredging should be performed. Some of these parameters have pre-established triggers including<br />
tidal muting, beach width, and loss of subtidal habitat. Other parameters do not presently have<br />
established criteria for triggering a dredging event.<br />
In reviewing the established dredging triggers, it is clear that some of the triggers may never be met<br />
except under extreme circumstances, while more significant triggers may exist that have not as yet<br />
been quantified. Chronic beach erosion triggers are not likely to be met because of the ongoing<br />
replenishment at Surfside-Sunset and the program’s effect on long-term beach growth trends.<br />
Similarly, acute erosion triggers are not likely to be met due to the generally broad beach profiles at<br />
trigger point transects. It is more likely that maintenance dredging will be required to address an<br />
intrinsic system need related to the functionality of the MTB tidal control structures and Freeman<br />
Creek. Final triggers to address this issue will need to be set once all of the MTBs are open to the FTB<br />
and have operated under both normal and muted FTB conditions.<br />
During periods in <strong>2008</strong> when the average of the lowest spring tides in each tide series achieved<br />
elevations at or below –0.05 m NAVD, the west MTB functioned well. When the average of the<br />
lowest spring tides in each tide series achieved elevations at or above 0.28 m NAVD, the function of<br />
the west MTB was impaired and operational ranges were necessarily curtailed to avoid flooding above<br />
designed operational levels. As an interim-operating trigger for maintenance dredging, it is<br />
recommended that the occurrence of four or more consecutive low spring tides in the FTB that fail to<br />
achieve low elevations of 0.12 m NAVD or lower, on a running average basis, should suggest dredging<br />
is likely necessary. It is anticipated that maintenance triggers will need to be further modified in the<br />
future as the central and east MTBs are opened to tidal flows.<br />
Recommendations<br />
• Modify the expectations of tidal range in the FTB from 2.75 m to 2.29 m, with tidal elevations<br />
ranging from 2.02 to -0.27 m NAVD.<br />
• Remove the dredge trigger of the Mean Low Tide muting of 0.152 m.<br />
• Add an interim trigger of the rolling average of four consecutive lowest tides achieved during<br />
spring tide series exceeding 0.12 m NAVD, described in detail in Section 3.<br />
• Continue the tidal monitoring program with frequent reporting to show effects of the first<br />
maintenance dredging event occurring in 2009 and to assess the relationship between flood<br />
shoaling and tidal muting.<br />
Merkel & Associates, Inc. 9