16.05.2015 Views

2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...

2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...

2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> Lowlands Restoration <strong>Monitoring</strong><br />

<strong>2008</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

downcoast. To compensate for anticipated short-term sediment losses from the littoral budget due to<br />

the natural formation of an ebb bar, initial lagoon shoaling, and fillet formation along the jetties, the<br />

ebb bar located offshore of the entrance channel was pre-filled, and supplemental sand was placed as<br />

beach nourishment adjacent to the channel at the time of construction. These pre-fills were intended to<br />

minimize littoral sand loss to ebb bar formation and provide supplemental sand for early inlet<br />

stabilization. In addition, the long-term project sediment management plan provides for periodic<br />

down-coast beach nourishment using sediment derived from the FTB during maintenance dredging<br />

operations, restoring the sediment lost from the littoral budget to the downdrift beaches.<br />

MAINTENANCE DREDGING AND DREDGING TRIGGERS<br />

Parameters of tidal muting, beach width, loss of subtidal habitat, closure risk, muted tidal basin<br />

function, and water quality were analyzed to evaluate the functioning of the system and determine<br />

when dredging should be performed. Some of these parameters have pre-established triggers including<br />

tidal muting, beach width, and loss of subtidal habitat. Other parameters do not presently have<br />

established criteria for triggering a dredging event.<br />

In reviewing the established dredging triggers, it is clear that some of the triggers may never be met<br />

except under extreme circumstances, while more significant triggers may exist that have not as yet<br />

been quantified. Chronic beach erosion triggers are not likely to be met because of the ongoing<br />

replenishment at Surfside-Sunset and the program’s effect on long-term beach growth trends.<br />

Similarly, acute erosion triggers are not likely to be met due to the generally broad beach profiles at<br />

trigger point transects. It is more likely that maintenance dredging will be required to address an<br />

intrinsic system need related to the functionality of the MTB tidal control structures and Freeman<br />

Creek. Final triggers to address this issue will need to be set once all of the MTBs are open to the FTB<br />

and have operated under both normal and muted FTB conditions.<br />

During periods in <strong>2008</strong> when the average of the lowest spring tides in each tide series achieved<br />

elevations at or below –0.05 m NAVD, the west MTB functioned well. When the average of the<br />

lowest spring tides in each tide series achieved elevations at or above 0.28 m NAVD, the function of<br />

the west MTB was impaired and operational ranges were necessarily curtailed to avoid flooding above<br />

designed operational levels. As an interim-operating trigger for maintenance dredging, it is<br />

recommended that the occurrence of four or more consecutive low spring tides in the FTB that fail to<br />

achieve low elevations of 0.12 m NAVD or lower, on a running average basis, should suggest dredging<br />

is likely necessary. It is anticipated that maintenance triggers will need to be further modified in the<br />

future as the central and east MTBs are opened to tidal flows.<br />

Recommendations<br />

• Modify the expectations of tidal range in the FTB from 2.75 m to 2.29 m, with tidal elevations<br />

ranging from 2.02 to -0.27 m NAVD.<br />

• Remove the dredge trigger of the Mean Low Tide muting of 0.152 m.<br />

• Add an interim trigger of the rolling average of four consecutive lowest tides achieved during<br />

spring tide series exceeding 0.12 m NAVD, described in detail in Section 3.<br />

• Continue the tidal monitoring program with frequent reporting to show effects of the first<br />

maintenance dredging event occurring in 2009 and to assess the relationship between flood<br />

shoaling and tidal muting.<br />

Merkel & Associates, Inc. 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!