2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...

2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ... 2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...

bolsachicarestoration.org
from bolsachicarestoration.org More from this publisher
16.05.2015 Views

Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Monitoring 2008 Annual Report II. PHYSICAL MONITORING PROGRAM The physical monitoring program focuses on large-scale morphological changes of the system and tidal response to these changes. Principally this monitoring includes evaluation of inlet shoaling, coastal beach response to inlet conditions and sand loss to the inlet shoal, and tidal reaction to shoal development. The physical monitoring program is intended to monitor changes in relation to management needs, and to adaptively evaluate and recommend adjustment of maintenance and management triggers where appropriate to ensure health of the system and protection of coastal beach resources. 2.1. INLET FLOOD SHOAL Introduction A newly constructed inlet to a tidally influenced system will typically interrupt longshore sediment transport and divert sediment both offshore (creating an ebb bar) and towards the tidal basin (creating a flood shoal). As the ebb bar forms, it affects the wave and current regime. This, in turn, causes the shoreline planform to evolve toward a new dynamic equilibrium condition. Similarly, the flood and ebb tidal currents moving through the inlet will build and shape a flood shoal in the interior of the tide basin. The configurations and sizes of the bars depend on the tidal prism of the basin, cross-sectional area of the tidal inlet, length of the jetties, tidal range, sediment characteristics, and longshore sediment transport rate. While complete equilibrium is rarely achieved, rates of change within the ebb bar and flood shoal typically diminish as the conditions around a new inlet stabilize. To limit early adverse impacts of ebb bar development on the shoreline processes, approximately 929,326 m 3 (1,214,579 y 3 ) of sand was placed as pre-fill to form the ebb bar at Bolsa Chica prior to opening of the inlet. This fill was placed to avoid the potential for the full ebb bar developing from available beach sand engaged in longshore drift; thus robbing the littoral cell of mobile sand supply. As beach sand migrates longshore, it is made available for capture by flood tides entering the Bolsa Chica FTB. Sand is moved into the system where it settles into a flood shoal. A portion of this sand is moved back to the beach with the ebbing tide while a portion of the sand remains trapped in the shoal deposits. As the flood shoal matures, it will begin to restrict ebbing tidal flow through the inlet. Tidal flow restriction will diminish or mute the full tidal range in the system relative to the tidal range that would exist without the flood shoal. Therefore, a monitoring, maintenance, and maintenance dredging plan was incorporated into the Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project and is being implemented as an essential component to the long-term health and viability of the system. The oversized inlet of Bolsa Chica was sized to accommodate the tidal prism of the FTB, the three MTBs, and the FFTB. From the time of opening and throughout 2007, only the FTB supplied tidal prism through the inlet. In February 2008, the West MTB was opened adding additional muted prism to the FTB. Other basins remained closed through the remainder of 2008. As a result of the oversizing of the inlet, tidal velocities through the inlet are too low to keep the channel between the jetties fully open and sedimentation has occurred in the inlet channel as would be expected. As additional tidal prism is added to the system, the inlet mouth will increase in cross-sectional area as it responds to the higher tidal velocity required to feed the system during tidal exchanges. The preliminary engineering studies (M&N 1999) done for the project predicted a flood shoal volume of 126,200 m 3 (165,000 y 3 ) at the end of the first year and a shoaling rate of 102,500 m 3 /year (134,000 Merkel & Associates, Inc. 99

Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Monitoring 2008 Annual Report y 3 /year) for the second year after the inlet was to be connected to the ocean, for a total of approximately 230,000 m 3 (300,000 y 3 ) over the first two years. The predicted flood shoal location is illustrated in Figure 2-1. Investigations were completed to assess the true rate of shoal accretion and distribution pattern of flood shoal development. Full Tidal Basin (Phase I) Modeled Shoal Area Tidal Inlet Scale 1’’= 1,800’ Figure 2-1. Predicted flood shoal area (cited from M&N 1999) Methodology The rate and distribution of sand accretion in the FTB inlet has been assessed during the first two monitoring years on January 19, 2007, June 27, 2007, January 10, 2008, and July 1, 2008. After the January 2007 survey it became clear that a larger area needed to be surveyed to capture the extent of the shoaling, therefore all following surveys extended a considerable distance further to the north. A survey was also conducted on December 23, 2008 by the maintenance dredging contractor hired to remove the accumulated sand from the inlet during the 2008/2009 winter season. This survey was performed by the dredging contractor’s surveyor, CLE Engineering, Inc., and was intended to document the pre-dredge bathymetric condition. The surveys were conducted from a small survey vessel with sub-meter accurate differential global positioning system (dGPS) and a survey-grade SyQuest Hydrobox ® fathometer. Land surveying was conducted using a total station to complete areas that were too shallow to conduct hydrographic surveys during the various survey intervals. The bathymetric survey area was previously presented in Figure 1-1. The methodology for the CLE survey in December 2008 was comparable to that completed by M&A, as described above. The December 2008 survey area did not cover the western Merkel & Associates, Inc. 100

<strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> Lowlands Restoration <strong>Monitoring</strong><br />

<strong>2008</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

II. PHYSICAL MONITORING PROGRAM<br />

The physical monitoring program focuses on large-scale morphological changes of the system and<br />

tidal response to these changes. Principally this monitoring includes evaluation of inlet shoaling,<br />

coastal beach response to inlet conditions and sand loss to the inlet shoal, and tidal reaction to shoal<br />

development. The physical monitoring program is intended to monitor changes in relation to<br />

management needs, and to adaptively evaluate and recommend adjustment of maintenance and<br />

management triggers where appropriate to ensure health of the system and protection of coastal beach<br />

resources.<br />

2.1. INLET FLOOD SHOAL<br />

Introduction<br />

A newly constructed inlet to a tidally influenced system will typically interrupt longshore sediment<br />

transport and divert sediment both offshore (creating an ebb bar) and towards the tidal basin (creating a<br />

flood shoal). As the ebb bar forms, it affects the wave and current regime. This, in turn, causes the<br />

shoreline planform to evolve toward a new dynamic equilibrium condition. Similarly, the flood and<br />

ebb tidal currents moving through the inlet will build and shape a flood shoal in the interior of the tide<br />

basin. The configurations and sizes of the bars depend on the tidal prism of the basin, cross-sectional<br />

area of the tidal inlet, length of the jetties, tidal range, sediment characteristics, and longshore sediment<br />

transport rate. While complete equilibrium is rarely achieved, rates of change within the ebb bar and<br />

flood shoal typically diminish as the conditions around a new inlet stabilize. To limit early adverse<br />

impacts of ebb bar development on the shoreline processes, approximately 929,326 m 3 (1,214,579 y 3 )<br />

of sand was placed as pre-fill to form the ebb bar at <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> prior to opening of the inlet. This fill<br />

was placed to avoid the potential for the full ebb bar developing from available beach sand engaged in<br />

longshore drift; thus robbing the littoral cell of mobile sand supply.<br />

As beach sand migrates longshore, it is made available for capture by flood tides entering the <strong>Bolsa</strong><br />

<strong>Chica</strong> FTB. Sand is moved into the system where it settles into a flood shoal. A portion of this sand is<br />

moved back to the beach with the ebbing tide while a portion of the sand remains trapped in the shoal<br />

deposits. As the flood shoal matures, it will begin to restrict ebbing tidal flow through the inlet. Tidal<br />

flow restriction will diminish or mute the full tidal range in the system relative to the tidal range that<br />

would exist without the flood shoal. Therefore, a monitoring, maintenance, and maintenance dredging<br />

plan was incorporated into the <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> Lowlands Restoration Project and is being implemented as<br />

an essential component to the long-term health and viability of the system.<br />

The oversized inlet of <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> was sized to accommodate the tidal prism of the FTB, the three<br />

MTBs, and the FFTB. From the time of opening and throughout 2007, only the FTB supplied tidal<br />

prism through the inlet. In February <strong>2008</strong>, the West MTB was opened adding additional muted prism<br />

to the FTB. Other basins remained closed through the remainder of <strong>2008</strong>. As a result of the oversizing<br />

of the inlet, tidal velocities through the inlet are too low to keep the channel between the jetties fully<br />

open and sedimentation has occurred in the inlet channel as would be expected. As additional tidal<br />

prism is added to the system, the inlet mouth will increase in cross-sectional area as it responds to the<br />

higher tidal velocity required to feed the system during tidal exchanges.<br />

The preliminary engineering studies (M&N 1999) done for the project predicted a flood shoal volume<br />

of 126,200 m 3 (165,000 y 3 ) at the end of the first year and a shoaling rate of 102,500 m 3 /year (134,000<br />

Merkel & Associates, Inc. 99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!