1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project 1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

bolsachicarestoration.org
from bolsachicarestoration.org More from this publisher
16.05.2015 Views

SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION Nine toxicity bioassays were conducted with sediment collected from the Full Tidal area, primarily in Cells 1, 3, 8, and 51. The tests were conducted using the marine amphipod (Eohaustorius estuarius) (Table 3-14). Two tests (from Cell 1 and from between Cell 3 and 8) resulted in significantly reduced survival and reburial. One test (from Cell 3) resulted in significant reduction in survival, but not reburial. Seven sediment bioaccumulation tests were conducted using the clam worm Nereis viriens. None of the samples were significantly different from controls for survival. However, bioaccumulation for several chemicals was significantly increased including cobalt, nickel, and vanadium from worms tested in Cell 3 sediments; and lead in worms tested in Cell 8 sediments. Semi-Aquatic Birds Risk estimates for semi-aquatic birds indicated that terns were the most sensitive (Table 4-2). Chemicals with possible risk (Category B) included cobalt, copper, zinc, and 4,4’-DDE for terns, and zinc for herons. The NOAEL HQs for these chemicals ranged from 1.9 to 86, and the LOAEL HQs ranged from 1.5 to 9.6 for copper and zinc, respectively. Chemicals with some possible risk (Category C) included cobalt (heron) and lead (tern and heron). Uncertain risks were estimated for several chemicals including barium, chromium, selenium, and dieldrin. NOAEL HQs for these chemicals ranged from 1.0 for barium to 57 for chromium, both for terns. 4.1.2.3 Future Full Tidal Aquatic Plants Estimates of potential risk to aquatic plants in sediments of the Future Full Tidal area indicated that risks are primarily a result of metals and PAHs. A summary of HQs exceeding one for aquatic plants is presented in Table 4-1. Two chemicals, nickel and selenium, exceeded chronic NOECs with HQs of 650 and 384, respectively. Comparisons to chronic LOECs resulted in 17 inorganics and 4 organics posing a possible risk (Category B). The HQs ranged from 1.9 for 4-nitrophenol to 850 for lead. Of those chemicals exceeding chronic LOECs, 4 were evaluated using an exposure point concentration that was ½ the reporting limit for a non-detect. Aquatic Invertebrates There were 14 inorganic and 28 organic chemicals with probable risk (Category A) (Table 4-3). Chemicals that exceeded both the ER-M and LC 50 consisted of chromium, nickel, zinc, chrysene, fluorene, phenanthrene, and low MW PAHs. Several chemicals had HQ exceeding 100 for either the ER-M or the LC 50 . Chemicals with HQs greater than 100 from comparisons to the ER-M included mercury (268) and chlordane – technical (633). Chemicals with HQs greater than 100 for comparisons to the LC 50 included beryllium (133), cobalt (181), nickel (224), thallium (276), and vanadium (193). Chemicals with possible risk (Category B – exceedance of a chronic low-effect level, but not an acute effect level) included anthracene, benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, benzo(b)fluoranthene, fluoranthene, pyrene, and high MW PAHs. The HQs for all these chemicals were less than 10. There were no chemicals in Category C (some possible risk), but there were several with uncertain risk (Category U). These chemicals exceeded the NOEC, but did not have a loweffect level RTV available. The NOEC HQs for these chemicals ranged from 44 to 1273. SAC/143368(004.DOC) 4-9 ERA REPORT 7/31/02

SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION Several toxicity bioassays were conducted using sediment collected from the Future Full Tidal area, including Cells 14 and 23 (4 samples); Cell 21 (3 samples); Cells 28, 36, 37, 40, and 63 (1 sample each); Cells 30, 32, 38 (2 samples each). The tests were conducted using the marine amphipod (Eohaustorius estuarius) (Table 3-14). All samples were significantly different from controls for survival with the exception of three samples from Cell 14; one sample from Cells 23, 32, 36, and 38; and two samples from Cell 34. In addition, one sample from Cell 30 was also significantly different from controls for reburial. Nine sediment bioaccumulation studies were conducted using the clam worm Nereis viriens. None of the samples were significantly different from controls for survival, but several showed significantly increased levels of specific chemicals, as shown below: • Cell 21- 4,4’-DDD, 4,4’-DDE, acenaphthene, chrysene, and fluorene. • Cell 23 – 4,4’-DDD and BHC-beta • Cell 24 – copper and 4,4’-DDD • Cell 30 – barium, copper, and lead • Cell 34 – copper • Cell 38 – copper, mercury, selenium, vanadium, zinc, 4,4’-DDD, and chlordane (alpha-, gamma-, and technical) Semi-Aquatic Birds Risk estimates for semi-aquatic birds (Table 4-2) indicated that herons were more sensitive than terns in some instances, whereas terns were more sensitive in others. The differences are accounted for by differences in dietary composition and the concentrations found in various dietary components. Chemicals that herons showed more sensitivity to included barium, chromium, cobalt, copper, nickel, and selenium. Terns were more sensitive to cadmium, lead, mercury, vanadium, zinc, 4,4’-DDD, 4,4’-DDE, dieldrin, and Aroclor 1254. Chemicals that had possible risks (Category B) included cobalt, copper, lead, zinc, 4,4’-DDE, and Aroclor 1254. The NAOEL HQs for these chemicals ranged from 1.6 (copper) to 81 (zinc), both for terns. The LOAEL HQs ranged from 1.2 (copper) to 9.0 (zinc) for terns. Chemicals with some possible risk (Category C) included cadimium (tern), and cobalt and lead (stilt). Several chemicals had uncertain risks (Category U) including barium, chromium, mercury, nickel, selenium, vanadium, 4,4-DDD, and dieldrin. 4.1.2.4 Garden Grove-Wintersburg Flood Control Channel Aquatic Plants Estimates of potential risk to aquatic plants in sediments (Table 4-1) of the Garden Grove- Wintersburg Flood Control Channel indicated that risks are primarily due to metals and PAHs. Nickel and selenium both exceeded chronic NOECs, but only selenium also exceeded the LOEC indicating possible risk (Category B). Eight additional inorganics and 2 organics also showed possible risk (Category B) by exceeding chronic LOECs. The highest HQs were observed for benzo(a)pyrene (HQ=12) and benzo(g,h,i)perylene (HQ=10), both of which were also evaluated using an exposure point concentration that was ½ the reporting limit for a non-detect. ERA REPORT 4-10 SAC/143368(004.DOC) 7/31/02

SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION<br />

Nine toxicity bioassays were conducted with sediment collected from the Full Tidal area,<br />

primarily in Cells 1, 3, 8, and 51. The tests were conducted using the marine amphipod<br />

(Eohaustorius estuarius) (Table 3-14). Two tests (from Cell 1 and from between Cell 3 and 8)<br />

resulted in significantly reduced survival and reburial. One test (from Cell 3) resulted in<br />

significant reduction in survival, but not reburial.<br />

Seven sediment bioaccumulation tests were conducted using the clam worm Nereis viriens.<br />

None of the samples were significantly different from controls for survival. However,<br />

bioaccumulation for several chemicals was significantly increased including cobalt, nickel, and<br />

vanadium from worms tested in Cell 3 sediments; and lead in worms tested in Cell 8 sediments.<br />

Semi-Aquatic Birds<br />

Risk estimates for semi-aquatic birds indicated that terns were the most sensitive (Table 4-2).<br />

Chemicals with possible risk (Category B) included cobalt, copper, zinc, and 4,4’-DDE for<br />

terns, and zinc for herons. The NOAEL HQs for these chemicals ranged from 1.9 to 86, and<br />

the LOAEL HQs ranged from 1.5 to 9.6 for copper and zinc, respectively. Chemicals with<br />

some possible risk (Category C) included cobalt (heron) and lead (tern and heron).<br />

Uncertain risks were estimated for several chemicals including barium, chromium,<br />

selenium, and dieldrin. NOAEL HQs for these chemicals ranged from 1.0 for barium to<br />

57 for chromium, both for terns.<br />

4.1.2.3 Future Full Tidal<br />

Aquatic Plants<br />

Estimates of potential risk to aquatic plants in sediments of the Future Full Tidal area<br />

indicated that risks are primarily a result of metals and PAHs. A summary of HQs<br />

exceeding one for aquatic plants is presented in Table 4-1. Two chemicals, nickel and<br />

selenium, exceeded chronic NOECs with HQs of 650 and 384, respectively. Comparisons to<br />

chronic LOECs resulted in 17 inorganics and 4 organics posing a possible risk (Category B).<br />

The HQs ranged from 1.9 for 4-nitrophenol to 850 for lead. Of those chemicals exceeding<br />

chronic LOECs, 4 were evaluated using an exposure point concentration that was ½ the<br />

reporting limit for a non-detect.<br />

Aquatic Invertebrates<br />

There were 14 inorganic and 28 organic chemicals with probable risk (Category A)<br />

(Table 4-3). Chemicals that exceeded both the ER-M and LC 50 consisted of chromium, nickel,<br />

zinc, chrysene, fluorene, phenanthrene, and low MW PAHs. Several chemicals had HQ<br />

exceeding 100 for either the ER-M or the LC 50 . Chemicals with HQs greater than 100 from<br />

comparisons to the ER-M included mercury (268) and chlordane – technical (633). Chemicals<br />

with HQs greater than 100 for comparisons to the LC 50 included beryllium (133), cobalt<br />

(181), nickel (224), thallium (276), and vanadium (193).<br />

Chemicals with possible risk (Category B – exceedance of a chronic low-effect level, but not<br />

an acute effect level) included anthracene, benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene,<br />

benzo(b)fluoranthene, fluoranthene, pyrene, and high MW PAHs. The HQs for all these<br />

chemicals were less than 10.<br />

There were no chemicals in Category C (some possible risk), but there were several with<br />

uncertain risk (Category U). These chemicals exceeded the NOEC, but did not have a loweffect<br />

level RTV available. The NOEC HQs for these chemicals ranged from 44 to 1273.<br />

SAC/143368(004.DOC) 4-9 ERA REPORT<br />

7/31/02

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!