1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project
1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project 1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project
SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION Upland Bird Evaluations for upland bird receptors (Table 4-2) indicated that there was some possible risk (Category C) to arsenic, cobalt, lead, and zinc; and uncertain risk (Category U) for chromium and selenium. Sparrows were more sensitive and had NOAEL HQs ranging from 1.4 (arsenic) to 7.2 (chromium). Mammals Evaluations for mammals in the Gas Plant Pond Area (Table 4-2) indicated that arsenic poses a possible (Category B) risk, and barium, lead, and zinc pose some possible risk (Category C). Chemicals that exceeded NOAELs, but did not have LOAELs (Category U risk) included cobalt, selenium, and vanadium. NOAEL HQs were typically higher for the mouse and ranged from 2.7 (cobalt) to 37 (barium). NOAEL HQs for coyotes ranged from 1.3 (zinc) to 3.5 (barium). In addition to the inorganic COECs, dieldrin also showed some possible risk to coyotes (HQ=1.9). 4.1.1.3 Muted Tidal Plus Rabbit Island Terrestrial Plants Evaluations for terrestrial plants (Table 4-1) indicated that both nickel and selenium exceeded chronic NOECs with HQs of 5 and 8.4, respectively. Chemicals exceeding chronic LOECs included 14 inorganics and 3 organics with HQs ranging from 1 for cadmium to 480 for lead. These chemicals are considered to pose a possible risk to terrestrial plants (Category B). Of those chemicals exceeding chronic LOECs, 4 were evaluated using an exposure point concentration that was ½ the reporting limit for a non-detect. Terrestrial Invertebrates Estimates of potential risks to terrestrial invertebrates (Table 4-1) indicated that risk for zinc was uncertain because it exceeded a chronic NOEC (HQ=1.4), but a LOEC was not available. Eight other inorganics and 1 organic posed a possible risk based on exceedance of a chronic LOEC. HQs for these chemicals ranged from 1.3 to 34, with barium (HQ=34) and lead (HQ=19) showing the greatest potential for risk. Upland Birds Evaluations for upland birds showed that lead posed possible risk (Category B) to the sparrow with a NOAEL HQ of 14 and a LOAEL HQ of 1.4 (Table 4-2). Cobalt and zinc posed some possible risk to upland birds, and chromium posed an uncertain risk to sparrows. NOAEL HQs ranged from 1.3 for zinc (kestrel) to 14 for lead (sparrow). Mammals Risk estimates for the harvest mouse and the coyote (Table 4-2) indicated that barium and lead posed some possible risk (Category C) to the mouse with HQs of 20 and 5, respectively. Barium was the only COEC identified for coyotes. Chemicals with uncertain risk (Category U) included cobalt and vanadium. 4.1.1.4 Seasonal Ponds Terrestrial Plants Evaluations for terrestrial plants (Table 4-1) showed that nickel and selenium exceeded chronic NOECs with HQs of 10 and 11, respectively. Chemicals that exceeded chronic LOECs (possible risk – Category B) included 12 inorganics and 2 organics. HQs ranged from 2.1 for molybdenum SAC/143368(004.DOC) 4-5 ERA REPORT 7/31/02
SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION to 160 for arsenic. Of those chemicals exceeding chronic LOECs, 4 were evaluated using an exposure point concentration that was ½ the reporting limit for a non-detect. Terrestrial Invertebrates Comparisons for terrestrial invertebrates (Table 4-1) show that chronic NOECs were exceeded by zinc with an HQ of 1.1, but risk is considered uncertain because a chronic LOEC was not identified. Chemicals exceeding chronic LOECs consisted of 6 inorganics and 1 organic indicating possible risk (Category B) for these COECs. Those with the highest HQs included arsenic, barium and chromium, with respective HQs of 5, 45, and 7.8. Upland Birds Risk estimates for upland bird species (Table 4-2) indicated that arsenic, cobalt, lead, and zinc all posed some possible risk to sparrows (Category C). Chromium posed an uncertain risk (Category U) because a LOAEL was not available). Zinc was the only chemical that exceeded a NOAEL for kestrels indicating some possible risk (Category C). Mammals Risk evaluations for mammals (Table 4-2) indicated that barium and lead posed some possible risk (Category C) for the mouse and coyote (barium only). Cobalt and vanadium also posed an uncertain risk (Category U) for the mouse. The NOAEL HQ ranged from 1.2 or lead (mouse) to 52 for barium (mouse). None of the chemicals detected exceeded available LOAELs. 4.1.2 Sediment/Soil – Aquatic and Semi-Aquatic Receptors Areas of the Lowlands that were evaluated for potential risks to aquatic and semi-aquatic receptors consisted of Bolsa Bay, Full Tidal, Future Full Tidal, Garden Grove-Wintersburg Flood Control Channel, Gas Plant Pond Area, Muted Tidal plus Rabbit Island, and Seasonal Ponds. Risk estimates were calculated for aquatic plants, aquatic invertebrates, and semiaquatic birds (heron, stilt, and tern). The results for chemicals with HQs exceeding 1 are presented in Table 4-1 for aquatic plants, Table 4-3 for aquatic invertebrates, and Table 4-2 for semi-aquatic birds. The HQs for all detected chemicals are presented in Appendix I, Tables I-1, I-2, and I-3. It should be noted that although the sediment bioaccumlation studies using Nereis showed significantly (P
- Page 35 and 36: SECTION 2:PROBLEM FORMULATION backg
- Page 37 and 38: SECTION 2:PROBLEM FORMULATION 2.4.1
- Page 39 and 40: SECTION 2:PROBLEM FORMULATION The f
- Page 41 and 42: SECTION 2:PROBLEM FORMULATION Benth
- Page 43 and 44: SECTION 2:PROBLEM FORMULATION Fish
- Page 45 and 46: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS The field sampl
- Page 47 and 48: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS CAR Sites A tot
- Page 49 and 50: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS 3.1.2 Data Eval
- Page 51 and 52: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS questionable. T
- Page 53 and 54: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS Pesticides were
- Page 55 and 56: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS copper were det
- Page 57 and 58: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS For five of the
- Page 59 and 60: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS the subsurface
- Page 61 and 62: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS 3.1.4 Exposure
- Page 63 and 64: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS 3.1.4.2 Exposur
- Page 65 and 66: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS Model The gener
- Page 67 and 68: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS 3.1.5 Exposure
- Page 69 and 70: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS The toxicity bi
- Page 71 and 72: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS The chronic tox
- Page 73 and 74: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS conductivity wi
- Page 75 and 76: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS the regression
- Page 77 and 78: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS Scatter plots a
- Page 79 and 80: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS concentrations,
- Page 81 and 82: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS dieldrin. These
- Page 83 and 84: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION Ha
- Page 85: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION Te
- Page 89 and 90: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION te
- Page 91 and 92: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION Se
- Page 93 and 94: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION Aq
- Page 95 and 96: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION 4.
- Page 97 and 98: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION pl
- Page 99 and 100: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION 4.
- Page 101 and 102: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION 4.
- Page 103 and 104: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION Po
- Page 105 and 106: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION 4.
- Page 107 and 108: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION De
- Page 109 and 110: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION no
- Page 111 and 112: CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AN
- Page 113 and 114: CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AN
- Page 115 and 116: CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AN
- Page 117 and 118: SECTION 6 References Abbasi, S. A.
- Page 119 and 120: SECTION 6: REFERENCES Dunteman, G.
- Page 121 and 122: SECTION 6: REFERENCES Kauss, P. B.
- Page 123 and 124: SECTION 6: REFERENCES RareFind. 199
- Page 125 and 126: SECTION 6: REFERENCES U.S. EPA. 199
- Page 127: SECTION 6: REFERENCES Wentsel, R. S
SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION<br />
to 160 for arsenic. Of those chemicals exceeding chronic LOECs, 4 were evaluated using an<br />
exposure point concentration that was ½ the reporting limit for a non-detect.<br />
Terrestrial Invertebrates<br />
Comparisons for terrestrial invertebrates (Table 4-1) show that chronic NOECs were<br />
exceeded by zinc with an HQ of <strong>1.1</strong>, but risk is considered uncertain because a chronic<br />
LOEC was not identified. Chemicals exceeding chronic LOECs consisted of 6 inorganics and<br />
1 organic indicating possible risk (Category B) for these COECs. Those with the highest HQs<br />
included arsenic, barium and chromium, with respective HQs of 5, 45, and 7.8.<br />
Upland Birds<br />
Risk estimates for upland bird species (Table 4-2) indicated that arsenic, cobalt, lead, and<br />
zinc all posed some possible risk to sparrows (Category C). Chromium posed an uncertain<br />
risk (Category U) because a LOAEL was not available). Zinc was the only chemical that<br />
exceeded a NOAEL for kestrels indicating some possible risk (Category C).<br />
Mammals<br />
Risk evaluations for mammals (Table 4-2) indicated that barium and lead posed some<br />
possible risk (Category C) for the mouse and coyote (barium only). Cobalt and vanadium<br />
also posed an uncertain risk (Category U) for the mouse. The NOAEL HQ ranged from<br />
1.2 or lead (mouse) to 52 for barium (mouse). None of the chemicals detected exceeded<br />
available LOAELs.<br />
4.1.2 Sediment/Soil – Aquatic and Semi-Aquatic Receptors<br />
Areas of the <strong>Lowlands</strong> that were evaluated for potential risks to aquatic and semi-aquatic<br />
receptors consisted of <strong>Bolsa</strong> Bay, Full Tidal, Future Full Tidal, Garden Grove-Wintersburg<br />
Flood Control Channel, Gas Plant Pond Area, Muted Tidal plus Rabbit Island, and Seasonal<br />
Ponds. Risk estimates were calculated for aquatic plants, aquatic invertebrates, and semiaquatic<br />
birds (heron, stilt, and tern). The results for chemicals with HQs exceeding 1 are<br />
presented in Table 4-1 for aquatic plants, Table 4-3 for aquatic invertebrates, and Table 4-2<br />
for semi-aquatic birds. The HQs for all detected chemicals are presented in Appendix I,<br />
Tables I-1, I-2, and I-3.<br />
It should be noted that although the sediment bioaccumlation studies using Nereis showed<br />
significantly (P