1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project
1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project
1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SECTION 4<br />
Risk Characterization<br />
The Risk Characterization is the final step in the ERA process whereby evidence linking<br />
COPECs to potential adverse ecological effects in the <strong>Lowlands</strong> is evaluated using both<br />
quantitative and qualitative methods. This evaluation is completed through the integration<br />
of information gathered in the Problem formulation with the results of the Analysis – the<br />
Exposure Characterization and the Ecological Effects Characterization – to establish a<br />
“weight-of-evidence” for potential risk. For this ERA, the evidence evaluated consisted of<br />
measured chemical concentrations in abiotic and biotic media, exposure estimates for birds<br />
and mammals, results of site-specific toxicity bioassays and bioaccumulation studies for<br />
aquatic organisms, and toxicity information obtained from the literature. In addition, the<br />
proposed restoration plan for the different evaluation areas in the <strong>Lowlands</strong> was considered<br />
in the overall assessment of risk potential to ecological receptors. The characterization of<br />
risk is accomplished through three interrelated steps: risk estimation, risk description, and<br />
uncertainty analysis. The final product is a listing of COECs for the <strong>Lowlands</strong> that will be<br />
recommended for further evaluation or remedial action.<br />
The identification of COECs through the Risk Characterization process is presented in<br />
Figure 4-1. All COPECs that exceeded any available RTV as well as chemicals that showed<br />
significant bioaccumulation in Nereis clam worms were retained as COECs. The overall risk<br />
posed by a COEC in a given medium and evaluation area was determined based on the<br />
types of RTVs that were exceeded (i.e., no-effect levels vs. low-effect levels and chronic<br />
effect levels vs. acute effect levels). The overall risk categories were defined as follows:<br />
• Unknown – RTVs were not available, so risk could not be quantified.<br />
• None – Exposure does not exceed any of the available RTVs.<br />
• Uncertain – Exposure exceeds a no-effect level, but risk could not be fully quantified<br />
because a low-effect level was not available (Category U).<br />
• Some Possible Risk – Exposure exceeds a no-effect level, but not a chronic low-effect<br />
level (Category C).<br />
• Possible Risk – Exposure exceeds a chronic low-effect level, but not an acute effect level<br />
(Category B).<br />
• Probable Risk – Exposure represents the highest level that could be quantified. Exposure<br />
exceeds an acute effect level or showed significant bioaccumulation in Nereis clam<br />
worms (Category A).<br />
4.1 Risk Estimation<br />
The risk estimation focuses primarily on quantitative methods to evaluate the potential for<br />
risk. For this ERA, these included numerical estimates of risk, or hazard quotients (HQs),<br />
and evaluation of site-specific toxicity bioassays and bioaccumulation studies.<br />
SAC/143368(004.DOC) 4-1 ERA REPORT<br />
7/31/02