16.05.2015 Views

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SECTION 3: ANALYSIS<br />

concentrations, potential toxicity that may result following inundation of sediments that are<br />

currently dry may be estimated, and remedial actions to mitigate this toxicity may be<br />

planned.<br />

Simple linear regression analyses of COPEC concentrations in pore water on those in<br />

sediment were performed using SAS (1994) PROC REG. All models were considered<br />

significant if p#0.05. The results of these analyses (scatterplots and associated regression<br />

analyses) for all chemicals and data transformations are presented in Appendix H. Of<br />

70 chemicals considered, significant regressions based on untransformed data were<br />

obtained for only seven chemicals (aldrin, arsenic, beryllium, alpha chlordane, endosulfan<br />

sulfate, mercury, and phenanthrene). The highest r 2 for these chemicals was 0.28. Significant<br />

regression models were obtained for 10 of 70 chemicals (acenaphthene, aldrin, arsenic,<br />

beryllium, alpha chlordane, copper, endosulfan I, endrin aldehyde, total DDT, and thallium)<br />

based on natural-log-transformed data. The highest r 2 from these data was 0.24.<br />

Because significant relationships between concentrations of COPECs in pore water to those<br />

in sediment were observed for few chemicals, and these relationships generally accounted<br />

for less that 25 percent of variation, the pore water bioassay results cannot be used to predict<br />

potential toxicity from pore water associated with the sediments. The pore water bioassays<br />

may, however, be used to evaluate potential toxicity at locations where pore water already<br />

exists.<br />

Correlations Between COPECs in Sediment<br />

Many COPECs have been detected in sediment from throughout the <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> <strong>Lowlands</strong><br />

(using the entire ERA Sampling and Analyses dataset). To aid in streamlining future data<br />

collection, correlation analyses were performed among analytes detected in sediment to<br />

determine which chemicals were consistently detected in association with each other.<br />

Analyses for chemicals whose occurrence is highly correlated may be reduced, such that<br />

only those chemicals that are the best indicators are analyzed for.<br />

Correlation analyses were performed using SAS (1994) PROC CORR. The resulting<br />

correlation matrix is presented in Table 3-22.<br />

Principal Components Analyses for COPECs in Sediment<br />

Principal components analyses (PCA), a multivariate statistical technique, is another<br />

approach to reduce the dimensionality (i.e., number of variables) associated with COPECs in<br />

sediment. PCA is a statistical technique that linearly transforms the original numerical<br />

variables to a substantially smaller set of uncorrelated variables that represent most of the<br />

information in the original dataset (Dunteman, 1989). These uncorrelated variables, known as<br />

principal components, are a linear combination of the original variables and are sorted in<br />

decreasing order of the amount of variability in the original dataset they explain. Backcorrelation<br />

of the principal component scores with the original data provides an indication of<br />

which parameters each principal component represents. PCA is generally a data evaluation<br />

method used to explore underlying relationships among variables in a large dataset.<br />

PCA was performed on the sediment data previously used for correlation analyses using<br />

SAS (1994) PROC PRINCOMP. (Note: the complete output from the principal components<br />

analyses is included in Appendix H.) A total of 47 principal components was generated, of<br />

which the first 9 accounted for 79.5 percent of the variance in the sediment data (Table 3-23).<br />

ERA REPORT 3-36 SAC/143368(003.DOC)<br />

7/31/02

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!