16.05.2015 Views

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SECTION 3: ANALYSIS<br />

conductivity within normal range for Ceriodaphnia. The remaining three had conductivity<br />

readings that indicated total dissolved solids would be out of the acceptable range for the<br />

Ceriodaphnia and so these samples were tested using the marine mysid (Mysidopsis bahia) as<br />

described in the next subsection.<br />

The chronic toxicity of the waters was tested using a series of five dilutions ranging from<br />

6.25 to 100 percent site sample. The tests were conducted using 10 test organisms per test<br />

concentration, with only one test organism in each of 10 polystyrene cups for a given test<br />

concentration. The animals were monitored daily for 6 days for survival and reproductive<br />

success. The results of the toxicity tests (Table 3-14) were statistically evaluated against the<br />

control samples. The NOEC for survival and reproduction was 50 percent for both samples,<br />

and the LOEC for survival and reproduction was 100 percent for both samples. The full<br />

bioassay report is presented in Appendix F and chemical concentrations associated with the<br />

NOEC and LOEC values are presented in Appendix G.<br />

Mysidopsis bahia<br />

Toxicity tests with Mysidopsis were conducted following U.S. EPA (1994f) guidelines for<br />

short-term toxicity tests for marine organisms. The tests were conducted by ToxScan, Inc., in<br />

Watsonville, California. As noted above, three of the stormwater monitoring samples had<br />

conductivity readings that indicated that total dissolved solids would be out of the<br />

acceptable range for the Ceriodaphnia, so these samples were tested using the marine mysid<br />

(Mysidopsis bahia).<br />

The sample salinity was adjusted to 25 ppt using Forty Fathoms® Brand Bioassay Grade sea<br />

salt and E-Pure water. The chronic toxicity of the waters was then tested using a series of<br />

5 dilutions ranging from 6.25 to 100 percent site sample. The tests were conducted using<br />

8 replicates for each test concentration with 5 test organisms per replicate. The animals were<br />

monitored daily for 7 days for survival. At the conclusion of the test, each surviving mysid<br />

was microscopically examined to determine its gender, each female was scored for presence<br />

of eggs in the oviduct or brood pouch, and, finally, the dry weight of the surviving mysids in<br />

each replicate was determined. The results of the toxicity tests (Table 3-14) were statistically<br />

evaluated against the control samples. The NOEC for survival, weight, and fecundity was<br />

100 percent in all samples. The LOEC for survival, weight, and fecundity was >100 percent in<br />

all samples. The full bioassay report is presented in Appendix F, and chemical concentrations<br />

associated with the NOEC and LOEC values are presented in Appendix G.<br />

3.2.1.2 Bioaccumulation Tests<br />

The potential for bioaccumulation of contaminants from <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> sediments was<br />

evaluated by ToxScan, Inc., using the clam worm, Nereis viriens; these worms were also<br />

monitored to evaluate survival, as described above. The bioaccumulation tests were<br />

conducted using sediment samples collected from a subset of the sample locations; the tests<br />

evaluated the uptake of contaminants by the worms. The complete report for the<br />

bioaccumulation tests is included in Appendix F.<br />

Although most of the test containers received 15 worms in each test aquarium, 5 percent of<br />

the test containers received 25 worms to provide sufficient tissue for quality assurance<br />

(matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate) during tissue chemical analysis. After the 28-day<br />

exposure period, the contents of each tank were gently rinsed through a screen, and the<br />

ERA REPORT 3-30 SAC/143368(003.DOC)<br />

7/31/02

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!