16.05.2015 Views

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SECTION 3: ANALYSIS<br />

2. For Dry Samples<br />

• Seawater was used to hydrate the sediments during the sediment compositing<br />

process. After an equilibration period of at least ten days, pore water was extracted<br />

and its salinity measured.<br />

−<br />

−<br />

If pore water salinity was within range, sediments and pore waters were used as<br />

test media with no adjustment.<br />

If pore water salinity was out of range, sediments and pore waters were adjusted<br />

as described for wet samples.<br />

Sediments<br />

<strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> sediment samples were evaluated for acute toxicity to the marine amphipod,<br />

E. estuarius, using the procedures outlined in ASTM (1990) guidelines. The tests were<br />

conducted by ToxScan, Inc., of Watsonville, California. Test and control sediments were<br />

sieved, and the salinity, pH, dissolved sulfide, and total ammonia were measured on the<br />

sediment sample pore water to ensure that ammonia and sulfide concentrations were below<br />

threshold limits for E. estuarius. This species was chosen as the test organism for this bioassay<br />

because of its euryhaline characteristics, its relative insensitivity to grain size, and its ability<br />

to perform well in a full range of salinities (2 to 34 ppt). It was anticipated that many<br />

sediments tested would be best served if salinity adjustments could be avoided. It should be<br />

noted that several sediments either required hydration (by addition of seawater) or showed<br />

porewater salinities outside the tolerance limits of Eohaustorius. In such cases, salinity<br />

adjustments were performed prior to testing, using ASTM recommendations for guidance.<br />

Five replicates were randomly assigned to 1-liter glass test jars with enough sediment to<br />

form a 2- to 3-centimeter layer on the bottom of each jar. The sediments were aerated using<br />

a pasteur pipet after settling and then covered with water of appropriate salinity. The test<br />

was started by randomly assigning 20 amphipods to each jar.<br />

The test was conducted for 10 days under static conditions with constant illumination and<br />

aeration in a chamber with a static 15° C ambient temperature. Daily measurements of<br />

temperature, pH, and dissolved oxygen were made in each test jar. At the end of the 10-day<br />

exposure period, the contents of each jar were poured through a sieve, and the surviving<br />

amphipods were counted. Survivors were then placed on a clean (home) sediment overlain<br />

by seawater at 15° C, and the number of amphipods that buried themselves within a 2-hour<br />

period was recorded. Pore water ammonia and dissolved sulfide concentrations were<br />

measured in one replicate of each test sediment at test initiation and at test termination.<br />

Reference toxicant bioassays were performed using cadmium chloride with each batch of<br />

test animals to verify the health and relative sensitivity of that test organism population.<br />

The results of the amphipod bioassay testing, summarized in Table 3-14, show that survival<br />

of the E. estuarius test organisms ranged from 0 percent to 98 percent. Among the test<br />

exposures with surviving organisms, the percent reburial ranged from 22 percent to<br />

100 percent. Survival rates were significantly different from controls in 30 out of 51 samples,<br />

whereas the reburial rates differed significantly in only 3 out of 51 tests. However, 5 tests<br />

had no survivors and thus no test organisms to rebury. Further analysis of these bioassay<br />

data is provided in Section 3.2.1.3.<br />

SAC/143368(003.DOC) 3-27 ERA REPORT<br />

7/31/02

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!