16.05.2015 Views

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SECTION 3: ANALYSIS<br />

the subsurface sediment samples and represents the 97th percentile value. All three<br />

cumulative percent plots for lead rise in a relatively smooth line to the break points, where<br />

the curves become less continuous and begin to rise more sharply (Appendix E, Figures E-22<br />

through E-24).<br />

Mercury<br />

Background levels for mercury in <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> sediments were estimated at < 0.28 mg/Kg dw.<br />

This value represents the 98th percentile for the all sample data set. When only detected<br />

values were considered in the all sample data set, the value represents the 93rd percentile. A<br />

value of < 0.23 mg/Kg dw (96th percentile) was estimated from surface sediment data set and<br />

a value of < 0.15 mg/Kg dw (95th percentile) was estimated from the subsurface sediment<br />

data set. This data set also had a large number of nondetect values with 391 samples out of the<br />

total 581 samples that were flagged as nondetects. The resulting cumulative percent plots<br />

(Appendix E, Figures E-25a, E-26, and E-27) show a two-stepped curve. When only the detect<br />

values were considered, the resulting cumulative percent plot shows a smooth curve to the<br />

break point, where the curve starts to rise more steeply (Appendix E, Figure E-25b).<br />

Nickel<br />

Background levels for nickel in the <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> Lowland sediments were estimated to be<br />

< 30 mg/Kg dw. This value represents the 95th and 93rd percentile levels for the all sample<br />

and surface data sets, respectively. A lower value of < 19.1 mg/Kg dw was estimated from<br />

the subsurface sediment samples and represents the 95th percentile value. All three<br />

cumulative percent plots for nickel rise in a relatively smooth line to the break points, where<br />

the curves become less continuous and begin to rise more sharply (Appendix E, Figures E-28<br />

through E-30).<br />

Selenium<br />

The background levels for selenium in <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> sediments were estimated at<br />

< 0.54 mg/Kg dw. This value represents the 78th and the 96th percentile values for the all<br />

sample and surface data sets, respectively. When the nondetect values are removed, this<br />

value represents the 94th percentile value for the all sample group. The different cumulative<br />

percent plots for the two data sets are presented in Figures 3-5a and 3-5b. The break point<br />

on the cumulative percent plot without nondetects (Figure 3-5b) provides a clearer view of<br />

the change in slope for selenium concentrations. The estimated values for the subsurface<br />

(< 0.49 mg/Kg dw) sediment samples were similar to that estimated from the all sample<br />

and surface sample groups. This data set also had a large number of nondetect values with<br />

368 samples out of the total 580 samples that were flagged as nondetects. The resulting<br />

cumulative percent plots for selenium (Appendix E, Figures E-31a and E-33) show a stepped<br />

curve. The cumulative percent plots for the surface sediments (Figure E-32) and the all<br />

sediment plot with only the detected values (Figure E-31b) show a smooth curve to the<br />

break points, where the curves become discontinuous and rise more steeply.<br />

Silver<br />

The background level for silver in <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> sediments is estimated to be < 0.22 mg/Kg dw.<br />

This value represents the 80th percentile value for the all sample data set. As was done for<br />

selenium, the all sample data set was also plotted without nondetect values in order to more<br />

ERA REPORT 3-16 SAC/143368(003.DOC)<br />

7/31/02

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!