16.05.2015 Views

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SECTION 3: ANALYSIS<br />

For five of the selected elements (cadmium, mercury, selenium, silver, and thallium), the<br />

data sets contained a relatively large number of samples that were classified as nondetects<br />

(i.e., flagged with “U” in the analytical database). Even though these nondetect reported<br />

values were divided by 2, the reporting limits were elevated enough so that the sample<br />

entries were still observed as elevated concentrations in the cumulative percent plots (for<br />

examples refer to Figure 3-5a and Figure 3-6a).<br />

In these cases, the cumulative percent plots did not clearly show a single break point<br />

between background and elevated concentrations because the plots show two separate<br />

locations where sample concentrations rise steeply. To clarify the break point between<br />

background and elevated levels for these constituents, the cumulative percent plots were<br />

regenerated with the nondetect entries removed from the data sets. Examples of the<br />

regenerated cumulative percent plots are provided in Figure 3-5b for selenium and<br />

Figure 3-6b for silver, which show a single break point once the nondetect entries are<br />

removed.<br />

Arsenic<br />

Background levels of arsenic in the <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> Lowland sediments are estimated to be<br />

< 11 mg/Kg dw. This value was relatively consistent among surface, subsurface samples,<br />

and the entire sample group. For surface samples, this background level represents the 88th<br />

percentile (i.e., 12 percent of the samples tested had concentrations above this value). This<br />

concentration represented the 95th and 91st percentile for subsurface samples and all<br />

samples, respectively. All three cumulative percent plots for arsenic (surface, subsurface,<br />

and all sample groups) rise in a smooth line to the break points, where the curves become<br />

less smooth as they rise more sharply (Appendix E, Figures E-1 through E-3).<br />

Barium<br />

Background levels of barium in the <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> Lowland sediments are estimated to be<br />

< 110 mg/Kg dw based on the evaluation of the all sample data sets. This value represents<br />

the 89th percentile for the all sample group. When the surface samples were considered<br />

alone, a background level of < 92 mg/Kg dw was estimated (81st percentile level). When<br />

the subsurface samples were considered, a background level of < 75.9 mg/Kg dw was<br />

estimated (86th percentile level). All three cumulative percent plots for barium rise in a<br />

smooth line to the break points, where the curves become less smooth and rise more sharply<br />

(Appendix E, Figures E-4 through E-6).<br />

Beryllium<br />

Background levels of beryllium in the <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> Lowland sediments are estimated to be<br />

< 0.94 mg/Kg dw based on the evaluation of the all sample data set. This value represents<br />

the 91st percentile for the all sample groups. When the surface samples were considered<br />

alone, a background level of < 0.88 mg/Kg dw was estimated (83rd percentile level).<br />

When the subsurface samples were considered alone, a background level of < 0.8 mg/Kg dw<br />

was estimated (95th percentile level). The differences among the surface, subsurface, and all<br />

sample values are probably not significant. All three cumulative percent plots for beryllium<br />

rise in a smooth to slightly stepped line to the break points, where the curves rise more<br />

sharply (Appendix E, Figures E-7 through E-9).<br />

ERA REPORT 3-14 SAC/143368(003.DOC)<br />

7/31/02

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!