16.05.2015 Views

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SECTION 3: ANALYSIS<br />

copper were detected in all five stilt egg samples. Other metals were detected with much<br />

lower frequency. Terrestrial plant tissue also had high metal detect frequencies. Almost all<br />

small mammal tissues had metal detects. Mercury, cobalt, and cadmium were the only<br />

metals not found in every sample. Several metals were detected in aquatic invertebrate<br />

samples, with only a few being detected in less than 50 percent of samples.<br />

Pesticides in sediment/soil were low except for 4’4-DDE and 4’4-DDD. Stilt eggs had a high<br />

number of detects for BHC-beta, dieldrin, 4’4-DDT and 4’4-DDE. Aldrin was also detected<br />

in small mammal tissue in 9 of 12 samples.<br />

PAHs and semi-volatiles were detected in various media, but numbers of detects were low.<br />

Waste oil was found in 54 percent of sediment/soil samples.<br />

Seasonal Ponds<br />

Metals, pesticides, PAHs, and semi-volatiles were all found in the Seasonal Ponds area.<br />

Metals were detected in high numbers in sediment/soil samples. Surface water samples<br />

were found to contain some metals although detection was infrequent in most cases. Copper<br />

and zinc, however, were found in all samples. All metals except nickel were found in all<br />

three stilt egg samples. Terrestrial plant tissue was also found to contain several metals.<br />

While sample size for small mammals is only two, the frequency of detection for metals was<br />

almost always 100 percent.<br />

Pesticide detects were relatively infrequent in the seasonal ponds except for 4’4-DDE in<br />

sediment/soil (25 of 49 samples).<br />

Both PAHs and semi-volatiles were detected, but frequencies were low.<br />

Surface water samples had TPH-diesel and waste oil detects in 100 percent of the samples.<br />

3.1.3 Background Evaluation<br />

An evaluation of inorganic constituents in onsite sediments was conducted for the <strong>Bolsa</strong><br />

<strong>Chica</strong> <strong>Lowlands</strong>. This evaluation was intended to establish the background (ambient) levels<br />

for metals, as described below. Normally, a background evaluation is conducted by a<br />

statistical comparison of the levels of inorganic constituents from samples collected on site<br />

to a body of data representative of local conditions but which are unaffected by site-related<br />

activities (Cal/EPA, 1997). The background values were used in evaluating potential sources<br />

and spatial distribution of COPECs (Section 3.1.4.1) and for developing site-specific sediment<br />

toxicity values using regression analyses (Section 3.2.1.3). They will also be used in the future<br />

to assist in the development of cleanup goals, which will be part of a separate deliverable.<br />

They were not used to screen out chemicals in the COEC selection process. Specifically, all<br />

detected chemicals were taken through the risk screening process to determine COECs.<br />

Chemicals were not excluded from the risk screening based on comparisons to background.<br />

Given the unique ecological and geologic conditions associated with the <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong><br />

<strong>Lowlands</strong>, the Technical Committee decided that the background evaluation would be<br />

based entirely upon analysis of sediment samples collected onsite. To complete the<br />

background evaluation for the <strong>Lowlands</strong>, the analytical results from the sediment samples<br />

associated with the ERA Sampling and Analyses (including samples from the proposed<br />

ERA REPORT 3-12 SAC/143368(003.DOC)<br />

7/31/02

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!