1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project 1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

bolsachicarestoration.org
from bolsachicarestoration.org More from this publisher
16.05.2015 Views

SECTION 3 Analysis The Analysis phase links the Problem Formulation to the Risk Characterization and consists of the technical evaluation of chemical and ecological data to determine potential for ecological exposure and adverse effects. The assessment endpoints and ecological conceptual site model defined in the Problem Formulation focus the Analysis, which consists of two components - the Exposure Characterization and the Ecological Effects Characterization. These two components are used to evaluate the relationships between receptors, potential exposures, and potential effects. The results of these evaluations provide the information necessary to determine or predict the potential risks to ecological receptors from the identified stressors under defined exposure conditions. The products of the Analysis consist of exposure profiles (from the Exposure Characterization) and stressorresponse profiles (from the Ecological Effects Characterization) that summarize the relationships between stressors and responses. 3.1 Exposure Characterization The Exposure Characterization includes an overview of the field activities conducted as part of the ERA Sampling and Analyses (CH2M HILL, 1998a) and Focused Sampling and Analyses (CH2M HILL, 2000); an evaluation of the chemical data for sediment/soil, surface water, pore water, and biota collected as part of the sampling and analysis, an evaluation of onsite background conditions for inorganic chemicals, an exposure analysis for the representative species, and the exposure profile. 3.1.1 Field Sampling and Analysis The first phase of sampling and analysis (ERA Sampling and Analyses) was designed to complete the initial sampling for areas away from known or suspected sources of contamination, to conduct toxicity and bioaccumulation bioassays (using site-collected sediment or water from “random” and “focused” sites), and to analyze field-collected biota. The sampled areas include material within the dredging “footprint” for the Full Tidal habitat, but only that portion just below the depth of dredging. The bioassays for the ERA were designed to determine acceptable levels of inorganic and organic chemicals in media to which ecological receptors may be exposed under current or future conditions. Bioassay media included sediment, surface water, and pore water from random and focused sampling sites. The second phase of sampling and analysis (Focused Sampling and Analyses) was designed to evaluate the nature of contamination, if any, associated with previously identified known or suspected sources (such as sumps, wells, pipelines, maintenance areas, etc.), and to conduct follow-up sampling of randomly sampled locations where composited samples contained elevated levels of chemicals. This focused sampling was conducted after the Scoping Assessment Report and EEC Report were completed. SAC/143368(003.DOC) 3-1 ERA REPORT 7/31/02

SECTION 3: ANALYSIS The field sampling program is described briefly in this section, and sample collection locations are shown in Figures 3-1, 3-2, and 3-3. A detailed description of the field sampling is included in Appendix A and core logs for each sampled location are presented in Appendix B. 3.1.1.1 ERA Sampling and Analyses The information collected in the field from the ERA sampling program, along with results of toxicity and bioaccumulation tests conducted in the laboratory, were used to complete the EEC Report (CH2M HILL, 1999). ERA Sampling was conducted in areas away from known or suspected sources of contamination (described as random sampling) and in selected areas where previous studies identified elevated levels of chemicals or contamination (described as focused sampling). In addition, toxicity and bioaccumulation bioassays were conducted using site-collected sediment and surface water from random and focused sites, and fieldcollected biota were analyzed. Random sampling was conducted throughout the Lowlands at a density of one sample location for each area of approximately 4 acres, with at least one sample point located in each Cell. Samples from up to six contiguous areas within the same Cell were combined to form a composite, stratified by depth. The surface sample included 0 to 6 inches bgs; the subsurface sample included the combined mid-depth (18 to 24 inches bgs) and bottom depth (42 to 48 inches bgs) of the core. Sediment/soil from the expected dredging depth to 2 feet below that depth was sampled and analyzed to determine whether any chemicals found there are likely to be toxic or to bioaccumulate in exposed organisms. No significant deviations from the sampling program occurred during sampling activities. Small adjustments were made in the field to accommodate sample collection (e.g., moving a sampling location if it fell on a physical structure such as a pipe or other solid obstruction to allow for collection of a sample). Samples were analyzed for a defined “suite” of analytes. These suites of analytes were used for three basic purposes: • To analyze the sediment/soil (Suites A, B, and C), water (Suite D), and tissue (Suite E) matrices for contaminants as required for ERA purposes (see Appendix A, Table A-2) • To furnish contaminant results at low detection limits (Suite C) to ascertain if unknown contaminants are present that were not covered by the other suites (Suites A and B) • To confirm that conditions outside the focused sites are suitable for marine organisms. A detailed Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) was followed during the course of the sampling and analysis and is included in Appendix C. Each surface sediment (0 to 6 inches bgs) composite sample was analyzed for a low detection limit suite of analytes (Suite C). All subsurface sediment (> 6 inches bgs) composite samples were analyzed for either Suite A or Suite B analytes. Of the random sampling sites, 24 were selected for sediment and pore water toxicity bioassays, and 10 of those sediments were also submitted for laboratory bioaccumulation tests. Surface water ponded in Cells was collected and submitted for Suite D analyses as well as toxicity bioassays. The random sampling program included a total of 277 core locations generating 158 samples of sediments for analyses (92 for Suite A, 66 for Suite C). A summary of the ERA REPORT 3-2 SAC/143368(003.DOC) 7/31/02

SECTION 3: ANALYSIS<br />

The field sampling program is described briefly in this section, and sample collection<br />

locations are shown in Figures 3-1, 3-2, and 3-3. A detailed description of the field sampling<br />

is included in Appendix A and core logs for each sampled location are presented in<br />

Appendix B.<br />

3.<strong>1.1</strong>.1 ERA Sampling and Analyses<br />

The information collected in the field from the ERA sampling program, along with results of<br />

toxicity and bioaccumulation tests conducted in the laboratory, were used to complete the<br />

EEC Report (CH2M HILL, 1999). ERA Sampling was conducted in areas away from known<br />

or suspected sources of contamination (described as random sampling) and in selected areas<br />

where previous studies identified elevated levels of chemicals or contamination (described<br />

as focused sampling). In addition, toxicity and bioaccumulation bioassays were conducted<br />

using site-collected sediment and surface water from random and focused sites, and fieldcollected<br />

biota were analyzed.<br />

Random sampling was conducted throughout the <strong>Lowlands</strong> at a density of one sample<br />

location for each area of approximately 4 acres, with at least one sample point located in<br />

each Cell. Samples from up to six contiguous areas within the same Cell were combined to<br />

form a composite, stratified by depth. The surface sample included 0 to 6 inches bgs; the<br />

subsurface sample included the combined mid-depth (18 to 24 inches bgs) and bottom<br />

depth (42 to 48 inches bgs) of the core. Sediment/soil from the expected dredging depth to<br />

2 feet below that depth was sampled and analyzed to determine whether any chemicals<br />

found there are likely to be toxic or to bioaccumulate in exposed organisms. No significant<br />

deviations from the sampling program occurred during sampling activities. Small<br />

adjustments were made in the field to accommodate sample collection (e.g., moving a<br />

sampling location if it fell on a physical structure such as a pipe or other solid obstruction to<br />

allow for collection of a sample).<br />

Samples were analyzed for a defined “suite” of analytes. These suites of analytes were used<br />

for three basic purposes:<br />

• To analyze the sediment/soil (Suites A, B, and C), water (Suite D), and tissue (Suite E)<br />

matrices for contaminants as required for ERA purposes (see Appendix A, Table A-2)<br />

• To furnish contaminant results at low detection limits (Suite C) to ascertain if unknown<br />

contaminants are present that were not covered by the other suites (Suites A and B)<br />

• To confirm that conditions outside the focused sites are suitable for marine organisms. A<br />

detailed Quality Assurance <strong>Project</strong> Plan (QAPP) was followed during the course of the<br />

sampling and analysis and is included in Appendix C.<br />

Each surface sediment (0 to 6 inches bgs) composite sample was analyzed for a low<br />

detection limit suite of analytes (Suite C). All subsurface sediment (> 6 inches bgs)<br />

composite samples were analyzed for either Suite A or Suite B analytes. Of the random<br />

sampling sites, 24 were selected for sediment and pore water toxicity bioassays, and 10 of<br />

those sediments were also submitted for laboratory bioaccumulation tests. Surface water<br />

ponded in Cells was collected and submitted for Suite D analyses as well as toxicity<br />

bioassays. The random sampling program included a total of 277 core locations generating<br />

158 samples of sediments for analyses (92 for Suite A, 66 for Suite C). A summary of the<br />

ERA REPORT 3-2 SAC/143368(003.DOC)<br />

7/31/02

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!