1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project
1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project 1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project
SECTION 3 Analysis The Analysis phase links the Problem Formulation to the Risk Characterization and consists of the technical evaluation of chemical and ecological data to determine potential for ecological exposure and adverse effects. The assessment endpoints and ecological conceptual site model defined in the Problem Formulation focus the Analysis, which consists of two components - the Exposure Characterization and the Ecological Effects Characterization. These two components are used to evaluate the relationships between receptors, potential exposures, and potential effects. The results of these evaluations provide the information necessary to determine or predict the potential risks to ecological receptors from the identified stressors under defined exposure conditions. The products of the Analysis consist of exposure profiles (from the Exposure Characterization) and stressorresponse profiles (from the Ecological Effects Characterization) that summarize the relationships between stressors and responses. 3.1 Exposure Characterization The Exposure Characterization includes an overview of the field activities conducted as part of the ERA Sampling and Analyses (CH2M HILL, 1998a) and Focused Sampling and Analyses (CH2M HILL, 2000); an evaluation of the chemical data for sediment/soil, surface water, pore water, and biota collected as part of the sampling and analysis, an evaluation of onsite background conditions for inorganic chemicals, an exposure analysis for the representative species, and the exposure profile. 3.1.1 Field Sampling and Analysis The first phase of sampling and analysis (ERA Sampling and Analyses) was designed to complete the initial sampling for areas away from known or suspected sources of contamination, to conduct toxicity and bioaccumulation bioassays (using site-collected sediment or water from “random” and “focused” sites), and to analyze field-collected biota. The sampled areas include material within the dredging “footprint” for the Full Tidal habitat, but only that portion just below the depth of dredging. The bioassays for the ERA were designed to determine acceptable levels of inorganic and organic chemicals in media to which ecological receptors may be exposed under current or future conditions. Bioassay media included sediment, surface water, and pore water from random and focused sampling sites. The second phase of sampling and analysis (Focused Sampling and Analyses) was designed to evaluate the nature of contamination, if any, associated with previously identified known or suspected sources (such as sumps, wells, pipelines, maintenance areas, etc.), and to conduct follow-up sampling of randomly sampled locations where composited samples contained elevated levels of chemicals. This focused sampling was conducted after the Scoping Assessment Report and EEC Report were completed. SAC/143368(003.DOC) 3-1 ERA REPORT 7/31/02
SECTION 3: ANALYSIS The field sampling program is described briefly in this section, and sample collection locations are shown in Figures 3-1, 3-2, and 3-3. A detailed description of the field sampling is included in Appendix A and core logs for each sampled location are presented in Appendix B. 3.1.1.1 ERA Sampling and Analyses The information collected in the field from the ERA sampling program, along with results of toxicity and bioaccumulation tests conducted in the laboratory, were used to complete the EEC Report (CH2M HILL, 1999). ERA Sampling was conducted in areas away from known or suspected sources of contamination (described as random sampling) and in selected areas where previous studies identified elevated levels of chemicals or contamination (described as focused sampling). In addition, toxicity and bioaccumulation bioassays were conducted using site-collected sediment and surface water from random and focused sites, and fieldcollected biota were analyzed. Random sampling was conducted throughout the Lowlands at a density of one sample location for each area of approximately 4 acres, with at least one sample point located in each Cell. Samples from up to six contiguous areas within the same Cell were combined to form a composite, stratified by depth. The surface sample included 0 to 6 inches bgs; the subsurface sample included the combined mid-depth (18 to 24 inches bgs) and bottom depth (42 to 48 inches bgs) of the core. Sediment/soil from the expected dredging depth to 2 feet below that depth was sampled and analyzed to determine whether any chemicals found there are likely to be toxic or to bioaccumulate in exposed organisms. No significant deviations from the sampling program occurred during sampling activities. Small adjustments were made in the field to accommodate sample collection (e.g., moving a sampling location if it fell on a physical structure such as a pipe or other solid obstruction to allow for collection of a sample). Samples were analyzed for a defined “suite” of analytes. These suites of analytes were used for three basic purposes: • To analyze the sediment/soil (Suites A, B, and C), water (Suite D), and tissue (Suite E) matrices for contaminants as required for ERA purposes (see Appendix A, Table A-2) • To furnish contaminant results at low detection limits (Suite C) to ascertain if unknown contaminants are present that were not covered by the other suites (Suites A and B) • To confirm that conditions outside the focused sites are suitable for marine organisms. A detailed Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) was followed during the course of the sampling and analysis and is included in Appendix C. Each surface sediment (0 to 6 inches bgs) composite sample was analyzed for a low detection limit suite of analytes (Suite C). All subsurface sediment (> 6 inches bgs) composite samples were analyzed for either Suite A or Suite B analytes. Of the random sampling sites, 24 were selected for sediment and pore water toxicity bioassays, and 10 of those sediments were also submitted for laboratory bioaccumulation tests. Surface water ponded in Cells was collected and submitted for Suite D analyses as well as toxicity bioassays. The random sampling program included a total of 277 core locations generating 158 samples of sediments for analyses (92 for Suite A, 66 for Suite C). A summary of the ERA REPORT 3-2 SAC/143368(003.DOC) 7/31/02
- Page 1 and 2: REVISED FINAL VOLUME I Ecological R
- Page 3 and 4: CONTENTS 3. Analysis...............
- Page 5 and 6: CONTENTS 3-21 Summary of EC 50 s an
- Page 7 and 8: Executive Summary The Bolsa Chica L
- Page 9 and 10: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The ERA report ev
- Page 11 and 12: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY “focused sampli
- Page 13 and 14: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Exposure point co
- Page 15 and 16: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY sample. However,
- Page 17 and 18: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The chemicals in
- Page 19 and 20: SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION • Sedimen
- Page 21 and 22: SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION Assessment
- Page 23 and 24: SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION Based on th
- Page 25 and 26: SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 1.5 Organiz
- Page 27 and 28: SECTION 2:PROBLEM FORMULATION The L
- Page 29 and 30: SECTION 2:PROBLEM FORMULATION The e
- Page 31 and 32: SECTION 2:PROBLEM FORMULATION 2.2.1
- Page 33 and 34: SECTION 2:PROBLEM FORMULATION tern
- Page 35 and 36: SECTION 2:PROBLEM FORMULATION backg
- Page 37 and 38: SECTION 2:PROBLEM FORMULATION 2.4.1
- Page 39 and 40: SECTION 2:PROBLEM FORMULATION The f
- Page 41 and 42: SECTION 2:PROBLEM FORMULATION Benth
- Page 43: SECTION 2:PROBLEM FORMULATION Fish
- Page 47 and 48: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS CAR Sites A tot
- Page 49 and 50: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS 3.1.2 Data Eval
- Page 51 and 52: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS questionable. T
- Page 53 and 54: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS Pesticides were
- Page 55 and 56: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS copper were det
- Page 57 and 58: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS For five of the
- Page 59 and 60: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS the subsurface
- Page 61 and 62: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS 3.1.4 Exposure
- Page 63 and 64: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS 3.1.4.2 Exposur
- Page 65 and 66: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS Model The gener
- Page 67 and 68: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS 3.1.5 Exposure
- Page 69 and 70: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS The toxicity bi
- Page 71 and 72: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS The chronic tox
- Page 73 and 74: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS conductivity wi
- Page 75 and 76: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS the regression
- Page 77 and 78: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS Scatter plots a
- Page 79 and 80: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS concentrations,
- Page 81 and 82: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS dieldrin. These
- Page 83 and 84: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION Ha
- Page 85 and 86: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION Te
- Page 87 and 88: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION to
- Page 89 and 90: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION te
- Page 91 and 92: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION Se
- Page 93 and 94: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION Aq
SECTION 3: ANALYSIS<br />
The field sampling program is described briefly in this section, and sample collection<br />
locations are shown in Figures 3-1, 3-2, and 3-3. A detailed description of the field sampling<br />
is included in Appendix A and core logs for each sampled location are presented in<br />
Appendix B.<br />
3.<strong>1.1</strong>.1 ERA Sampling and Analyses<br />
The information collected in the field from the ERA sampling program, along with results of<br />
toxicity and bioaccumulation tests conducted in the laboratory, were used to complete the<br />
EEC Report (CH2M HILL, 1999). ERA Sampling was conducted in areas away from known<br />
or suspected sources of contamination (described as random sampling) and in selected areas<br />
where previous studies identified elevated levels of chemicals or contamination (described<br />
as focused sampling). In addition, toxicity and bioaccumulation bioassays were conducted<br />
using site-collected sediment and surface water from random and focused sites, and fieldcollected<br />
biota were analyzed.<br />
Random sampling was conducted throughout the <strong>Lowlands</strong> at a density of one sample<br />
location for each area of approximately 4 acres, with at least one sample point located in<br />
each Cell. Samples from up to six contiguous areas within the same Cell were combined to<br />
form a composite, stratified by depth. The surface sample included 0 to 6 inches bgs; the<br />
subsurface sample included the combined mid-depth (18 to 24 inches bgs) and bottom<br />
depth (42 to 48 inches bgs) of the core. Sediment/soil from the expected dredging depth to<br />
2 feet below that depth was sampled and analyzed to determine whether any chemicals<br />
found there are likely to be toxic or to bioaccumulate in exposed organisms. No significant<br />
deviations from the sampling program occurred during sampling activities. Small<br />
adjustments were made in the field to accommodate sample collection (e.g., moving a<br />
sampling location if it fell on a physical structure such as a pipe or other solid obstruction to<br />
allow for collection of a sample).<br />
Samples were analyzed for a defined “suite” of analytes. These suites of analytes were used<br />
for three basic purposes:<br />
• To analyze the sediment/soil (Suites A, B, and C), water (Suite D), and tissue (Suite E)<br />
matrices for contaminants as required for ERA purposes (see Appendix A, Table A-2)<br />
• To furnish contaminant results at low detection limits (Suite C) to ascertain if unknown<br />
contaminants are present that were not covered by the other suites (Suites A and B)<br />
• To confirm that conditions outside the focused sites are suitable for marine organisms. A<br />
detailed Quality Assurance <strong>Project</strong> Plan (QAPP) was followed during the course of the<br />
sampling and analysis and is included in Appendix C.<br />
Each surface sediment (0 to 6 inches bgs) composite sample was analyzed for a low<br />
detection limit suite of analytes (Suite C). All subsurface sediment (> 6 inches bgs)<br />
composite samples were analyzed for either Suite A or Suite B analytes. Of the random<br />
sampling sites, 24 were selected for sediment and pore water toxicity bioassays, and 10 of<br />
those sediments were also submitted for laboratory bioaccumulation tests. Surface water<br />
ponded in Cells was collected and submitted for Suite D analyses as well as toxicity<br />
bioassays. The random sampling program included a total of 277 core locations generating<br />
158 samples of sediments for analyses (92 for Suite A, 66 for Suite C). A summary of the<br />
ERA REPORT 3-2 SAC/143368(003.DOC)<br />
7/31/02