16.05.2015 Views

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SECTION 2: PROBLEM FORMULATION<br />

The available screening benchmarks used to evaluate preliminary data in the Scoping<br />

Assessment are presented in Table 2-12 (preliminary soil background concentrations),<br />

Table 2-13 (sediment screening benchmarks), and Table 2-14 (surface water screening<br />

benchmarks). These benchmarks were updated in EEC Report and, again, as necessary for<br />

this ERA. Preliminary soil background values were discussed in the previous section.<br />

The screening process used for this phase of the evaluation was limited to comparing the<br />

maximum concentrations of chemicals detected in soil, sediment, and surface water that<br />

were retained in the data evaluation process (Section 2.3.1) to the selected screening<br />

benchmarks (Tables 2-9, 2-13, and 2-14).<br />

The maximum detected soil concentration in each area or site activity (e.g., waste sumps,<br />

pipelines, or service roads) was screened against the preliminary background<br />

concentrations for inorganic chemicals and the identified sediment screening benchmarks<br />

(Table 2-15). Soils were screened against sediment benchmarks because most of the site soils<br />

will become flooded as a result of proposed site restoration activities. Chemicals that<br />

exceeded either background values or the sediment screening benchmarks were identified<br />

as COPECs for the ERA. Chemicals that did not have an available benchmark were also<br />

retained for further evaluation in the ERA.<br />

The maximum detected sediment concentration in each area was screened against<br />

preliminary background values and sediment benchmarks (Table 2-16). Chemicals that<br />

exceeded either background values or the sediment screening benchmarks were identified<br />

as COPECs for the ERA. Chemicals that did not have an available benchmark were also<br />

retained for further evaluation in the ERA.<br />

The maximum detected surface water concentration in each area or site activity was<br />

screened against the selected surface water benchmark for chronic exposure (Table 2-17).<br />

Chemicals that exceeded the surface water screening benchmark were identified as COPECs<br />

for the ERA. Chemicals that did not have an available benchmark were also retained for<br />

further evaluation in the ERA.<br />

The COPECs identified in the Scoping Assessment (CH2M HILL, 1998b) for further<br />

evaluation are presented by area for soil (Table 2-18), sediment (Table 2-19), and surface<br />

water (Table 2-20). These COPECs, along with any others identified based on the ERA and<br />

focused sampling efforts, were further evaluated in this ERA (Section 3).<br />

2.4 Assessment Endpoints and Measures<br />

The overall objective of the Problem Formulation is to describe ecological characteristics<br />

of the <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> <strong>Lowlands</strong>, summarize previously existing data, compare contaminant<br />

concentrations to readily available screening benchmarks, and thereby assess whether<br />

ecological risks may exist. To meet this objective, potential ecological effects of the site<br />

contaminants important to decision making must be identified. Assessment endpoints<br />

and measures relevant to ecological resources in the <strong>Lowlands</strong> are defined in this section.<br />

SAC/143368(002.DOC) 2-11 ERA REPORT<br />

7/31/02

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!