16.05.2015 Views

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION<br />

Assessment (1996) into a single ERA chemical database for evaluation of potential risks<br />

to aquatic and terrestrial receptors in the <strong>Lowlands</strong>.<br />

• Incorporate and update the information from the EEC Report to provide the Problem<br />

Formulation, Exposure Characterization, and Ecological Effects Characterization for this<br />

ERA.<br />

• Present the results of the Risk Characterization, including weight of evidence for<br />

potential risks to aquatic and terrestrial receptors as well as a summary of uncertainties<br />

and/or limitations in the evaluations conducted.<br />

• Present the conclusions and recommendations of the ERA.<br />

1.2 <strong>Project</strong> Approach<br />

The ERA was conducted using a phased approach as recommended by the U.S. EPA (1992a<br />

and 1998) and California EPA (Cal/EPA 1996a and 1996b). This approach consisted of three<br />

data collection or evaluation phases (Figure 1-3) that were used to produce various<br />

documents, as described below. The data and observations from one phase were used to<br />

determine whether further studies were necessary to meet the objectives of the ERA. This<br />

ensured that “…only the necessary work [was] done and all of the necessary work [was]<br />

done” (U.S. EPA, 1992c). The three data collection phases and associated reports for the<br />

<strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> <strong>Lowlands</strong> are:<br />

Phase 1 – Initial review of available data resulting in the CSP/ERA Work Plan (1998a) and<br />

the Scoping Assessment (CH2M HILL, 1998b).<br />

Phase 2 – ERA Sampling and Analyses. Collection and evaluation of additional site-specific<br />

data and preparation of the EEC Report (CH2M HILL, 1999). The Work Plan was then<br />

revised (CH2M HILL, 2000) to describe the next phase of sampling.<br />

Phase 3 – Focused Sampling and Analyses. Additional collection and evaluation of sitespecific<br />

data to fill any remaining data gaps and preparation of this final baseline ERA.<br />

The Work Plan and Scoping Assessment (Phase 1) reviewed and evaluated previously<br />

available data (with the <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> Technical Committee) in sufficient detail to identify<br />

chemicals, habitats, and receptors of concern and screen chemical concentrations against<br />

available criteria, standards, or effect levels. The previously available data (Steffeck, et al.,<br />

1996; Tetra Tech, 1996) focused primarily on selected sites within the <strong>Lowlands</strong> where<br />

known or suspected oil field activities or urban inflow most likely resulted in contaminants<br />

being introduced into the <strong>Lowlands</strong> environment. Little sampling and few analyses had<br />

been done in most of the <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> <strong>Lowlands</strong>.<br />

The site wide sampling and analyses for the project were implemented in two rounds – the<br />

ERA Sampling and Analyses (first round) and the Focused Sampling and Analyses (second<br />

round). Because of schedule constraints for the project and the level of data review and<br />

evaluation conducted to prepare the Work Plan, the Technical Committee determined that<br />

the first round of sampling sampling could be conducted concurrently with preparation of<br />

the Scoping Assessment (Figure 1-3).<br />

ERA REPORT 1-4 SAC/143368(001.DOC)<br />

7/31/02

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!