1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project
1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project
1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION<br />
Assessment (1996) into a single ERA chemical database for evaluation of potential risks<br />
to aquatic and terrestrial receptors in the <strong>Lowlands</strong>.<br />
• Incorporate and update the information from the EEC Report to provide the Problem<br />
Formulation, Exposure Characterization, and Ecological Effects Characterization for this<br />
ERA.<br />
• Present the results of the Risk Characterization, including weight of evidence for<br />
potential risks to aquatic and terrestrial receptors as well as a summary of uncertainties<br />
and/or limitations in the evaluations conducted.<br />
• Present the conclusions and recommendations of the ERA.<br />
1.2 <strong>Project</strong> Approach<br />
The ERA was conducted using a phased approach as recommended by the U.S. EPA (1992a<br />
and 1998) and California EPA (Cal/EPA 1996a and 1996b). This approach consisted of three<br />
data collection or evaluation phases (Figure 1-3) that were used to produce various<br />
documents, as described below. The data and observations from one phase were used to<br />
determine whether further studies were necessary to meet the objectives of the ERA. This<br />
ensured that “…only the necessary work [was] done and all of the necessary work [was]<br />
done” (U.S. EPA, 1992c). The three data collection phases and associated reports for the<br />
<strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> <strong>Lowlands</strong> are:<br />
Phase 1 – Initial review of available data resulting in the CSP/ERA Work Plan (1998a) and<br />
the Scoping Assessment (CH2M HILL, 1998b).<br />
Phase 2 – ERA Sampling and Analyses. Collection and evaluation of additional site-specific<br />
data and preparation of the EEC Report (CH2M HILL, 1999). The Work Plan was then<br />
revised (CH2M HILL, 2000) to describe the next phase of sampling.<br />
Phase 3 – Focused Sampling and Analyses. Additional collection and evaluation of sitespecific<br />
data to fill any remaining data gaps and preparation of this final baseline ERA.<br />
The Work Plan and Scoping Assessment (Phase 1) reviewed and evaluated previously<br />
available data (with the <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> Technical Committee) in sufficient detail to identify<br />
chemicals, habitats, and receptors of concern and screen chemical concentrations against<br />
available criteria, standards, or effect levels. The previously available data (Steffeck, et al.,<br />
1996; Tetra Tech, 1996) focused primarily on selected sites within the <strong>Lowlands</strong> where<br />
known or suspected oil field activities or urban inflow most likely resulted in contaminants<br />
being introduced into the <strong>Lowlands</strong> environment. Little sampling and few analyses had<br />
been done in most of the <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> <strong>Lowlands</strong>.<br />
The site wide sampling and analyses for the project were implemented in two rounds – the<br />
ERA Sampling and Analyses (first round) and the Focused Sampling and Analyses (second<br />
round). Because of schedule constraints for the project and the level of data review and<br />
evaluation conducted to prepare the Work Plan, the Technical Committee determined that<br />
the first round of sampling sampling could be conducted concurrently with preparation of<br />
the Scoping Assessment (Figure 1-3).<br />
ERA REPORT 1-4 SAC/143368(001.DOC)<br />
7/31/02