1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SECTION 6: REFERENCES Steadman, T. M., Jr., N. H. Booth, P. B. Bush, R. K. Page, and D. D. Goetsch. 1980. Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Pentachlorophenol in Broiler Chickens. Poult. Sci. 59: 1018-1026. Steffeck, D., et al. 1996. Report of the Preliminary Level II Preacquisition Environmental Contaminants Survey for the Bolsa Chica Lowlands, Orange County, California. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Carlsbad, CA. December 18. Stickel, L. F. 1973. Pesticide residues in birds and mammals. In Environmental Pollution by Pesticides. Plenum Press, New York. 542 pp. Stickel, L. F., W. H. Stickel, R. A. Dyrland, and D. L. Hughes. 1983. Oxychlordane, HCS-3260, and Nonachlor in Birds: Lethal Residues and Loss Rates. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health. 12: 611-622. Sund, K. A., and N. Nomura. 1963. Laboratory Evaluation of Several Herbicides. Weed Res. 3: 35-43. Suter, G. W. II. 1993. Ecological Risk Assessment. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL. Suter, G. W. II and C. L. Tsao. 1996. Toxicological Benchmarks for Screening Potential Contaminants of Concern for Effects on Aquatic Biota: 1996 Revision. Prepared by Risk Assessment Program, Health Sciences Research Division, Oak Ridge, TN for U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management. June. Suter, G. W. II, R. A. Efroymson, E. B. Sample, and D. S. Jones. 2000. Ecological Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton. Sutou, S., K. Yamamoto, H. Sendota, K. Tomomatsu, Y. Shimizu, and M. Sugiyama. 1980. Toxicity, Fertility, Teratogenicity, and Dominant Lethal Tests in Rats Administered Cadmium Subchronically. I. Toxicity studies. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 4: 39–50. Tetra Tech, Inc. 1996. Phase II Environmental Assessment for Bolsa Chica Lowlands and Pocket Area, Huntington Beach, California. Report TC0798-05 prepared for Bolsa Chica Technical Committee by Tetra Tech, Inc., Pasadena, CA. October. Tucker, R. K. and D. G. Crabtree. 1970. Handbook of Toxicity of Pesticides to Wildlife. U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Resource Publication No. 84. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 1995. Design Guidelines for Tidal Channels in Coastal Wetlands. Prepared by R.N. Coates and six authors for Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. January. U.S. Department of the Interior (USDI), 1993. Personal communication from RaJean Strube Fossen, Bureau of Reclamation, to Harry M. Ohlendorf, CH2M HILL. 12 July. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1980. Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Pentachlorophenol. US Environmental Protection Agency. Rep. 440/5-80-065. U.S. EPA. 1988a. Chlordane. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 104: 47-62. U.S. EPA. 1988b. Thirteen-Week Mouse Oral Subchronic Toxicity Study. Prepared by Toxicity Research Laboratories, Ltd., Muskegon, MI, for the Office of Solid Waste, Washington, D.C. ERA REPORT 6-8 SAC/143368(006.DOC) 7/31/02
SECTION 6: REFERENCES U.S. EPA. 1991a. The Role of BTAGs in Ecological Assessment. ECO Update Volume 1, Number 1. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Publication 9345.0-05I. September. U.S. EPA. 1991b. Ecological Assessment of Superfund Sites: An Overview. ECO Update Volume 1, Number 2. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Publication 9345.0-05I. December. U.S. EPA. 1991c. Water Quality Criteria Summary. Office of Science and Technology. Health and Ecological Criteria Division. Washington, D.C. May. U.S. EPA. 1992a. Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment. Risk Assessment Forum, Washington D.C. EPA/630/R-92/001. February. U.S. EPA. 1992b. The Role of Natural Resource Trustees in the Superfund Process. ECO Update Volume 1, Number 3. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Publication 9345.0-05I. March. U.S. EPA. 1992c. Developing a Work Scope for Ecological Assessments. ECO Update Volume 1, Number 4. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Publication 9345.0-05I. May. U.S. EPA. 1992d. Briefing the BTAG: Initial Description of Setting, History, and Ecology of a Site. ECO Update Volume 1, Number 5. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Publication 9345.0-05I. U.S. EPA. 1992e. Water quality standards: establishment of numeric criteria for priority pollutants, states’ compliance, final rule. Federal Register 57:60910-60917. December. U.S. EPA. 1992f. Dermal Exposure Assessment: Principles and Applications. EPA/600/8-91/110B. Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C. U.S. EPA. 1993a. Sediment Quality Criteria for the Protection of Benthic Organisms: Fluoranthene. EPA-822-R-93-012. Washington, D.C. U.S. EPA. 1993b. Sediment Quality Criteria for the Protection of Benthic Organisms: Phenanthrene. EPA-822-R-93-014. Washington. D.C. U.S. EPA. 1993c. Wildlife Exposure Factors Handbook. Office of Research and Development, Washington D.C. EPA/600/R-93/187a. December. U.S. EPA. 1994a. Using Toxicity Tests in Ecological Risk Assessment. ECO Update Volume 2, Number 1. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Publication 9345.0-05I. EPA 540-F-94-012. September. U.S. EPA. 1994b. Catalogue of Standard Toxicity Tests for Ecological Risk Assessment. ECO Update Volume 2, Number 2. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Publication 9345.0-05I. EPA 540-F-94-013. September. U.S. EPA. 1994c. Field Studies for Ecological Risk Assessment. ECO Update Volume 2, Number 3. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Publication 9345.0-05I. EPA 540-F-94-014. September. SAC/143368(006.DOC) 6-9 ERA REPORT 7/31/02
Page 1 and 2:
REVISED FINAL VOLUME I Ecological R
Page 3 and 4:
CONTENTS 3. Analysis...............
Page 5 and 6:
CONTENTS 3-21 Summary of EC 50 s an
Page 7 and 8:
Executive Summary The Bolsa Chica L
Page 9 and 10:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The ERA report ev
Page 11 and 12:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY “focused sampli
Page 13 and 14:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Exposure point co
Page 15 and 16:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY sample. However,
Page 17 and 18:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The chemicals in
Page 19 and 20:
SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION • Sedimen
Page 21 and 22:
SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION Assessment
Page 23 and 24:
SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION Based on th
Page 25 and 26:
SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 1.5 Organiz
Page 27 and 28:
SECTION 2:PROBLEM FORMULATION The L
Page 29 and 30:
SECTION 2:PROBLEM FORMULATION The e
Page 31 and 32:
SECTION 2:PROBLEM FORMULATION 2.2.1
Page 33 and 34:
SECTION 2:PROBLEM FORMULATION tern
Page 35 and 36:
SECTION 2:PROBLEM FORMULATION backg
Page 37 and 38:
SECTION 2:PROBLEM FORMULATION 2.4.1
Page 39 and 40:
SECTION 2:PROBLEM FORMULATION The f
Page 41 and 42:
SECTION 2:PROBLEM FORMULATION Benth
Page 43 and 44:
SECTION 2:PROBLEM FORMULATION Fish
Page 45 and 46:
SECTION 3: ANALYSIS The field sampl
Page 47 and 48:
SECTION 3: ANALYSIS CAR Sites A tot
Page 49 and 50:
SECTION 3: ANALYSIS 3.1.2 Data Eval
Page 51 and 52:
SECTION 3: ANALYSIS questionable. T
Page 53 and 54:
SECTION 3: ANALYSIS Pesticides were
Page 55 and 56:
SECTION 3: ANALYSIS copper were det
Page 57 and 58:
SECTION 3: ANALYSIS For five of the
Page 59 and 60:
SECTION 3: ANALYSIS the subsurface
Page 61 and 62:
SECTION 3: ANALYSIS 3.1.4 Exposure
Page 63 and 64:
SECTION 3: ANALYSIS 3.1.4.2 Exposur
Page 65 and 66:
SECTION 3: ANALYSIS Model The gener
Page 67 and 68:
SECTION 3: ANALYSIS 3.1.5 Exposure
Page 69 and 70:
SECTION 3: ANALYSIS The toxicity bi
Page 71 and 72:
SECTION 3: ANALYSIS The chronic tox
Page 73 and 74: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS conductivity wi
Page 75 and 76: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS the regression
Page 77 and 78: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS Scatter plots a
Page 79 and 80: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS concentrations,
Page 81 and 82: SECTION 3: ANALYSIS dieldrin. These
Page 83 and 84: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION Ha
Page 85 and 86: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION Te
Page 87 and 88: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION to
Page 89 and 90: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION te
Page 91 and 92: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION Se
Page 93 and 94: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION Aq
Page 95 and 96: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION 4.
Page 97 and 98: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION pl
Page 103 and 104: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION Po
Page 107 and 108: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION De
Page 109 and 110: SECTION 4: RISK CHARACTERIZATION no
Page 111 and 112: CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AN
Page 117 and 118: SECTION 6 References Abbasi, S. A.
Page 119 and 120: SECTION 6: REFERENCES Dunteman, G.
Page 121 and 122: SECTION 6: REFERENCES Kauss, P. B.
Page 123: SECTION 6: REFERENCES RareFind. 199
Page 127: SECTION 6: REFERENCES Wentsel, R. S
show all

1.1 MB pdf - Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?