D5 Annex report WP 3: ETIS Database methodology ... - ETIS plus
D5 Annex report WP 3: ETIS Database methodology ... - ETIS plus D5 Annex report WP 3: ETIS Database methodology ... - ETIS plus
D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY AND DATABASE USER MANUAL – FREIGHT TRANSPORT DEMAND · Destination (region, country) · Commodities, · Modes (at the national border, EU border, at origin, at destination?), · Containerisation, · Weight · Value · Route information: • border crossing • transhipment sea ports • transhipment other terminal(s) These variables should be collected in as much detail as possible. The ideal situation would be that all information needed to describe transport would be available from the trade registrations. Unfortunately this is not expected to be found. It should be attempted to come as close as possible to the ideal situation. Elements like region to region information or transhipment locations are unfortunately only available in very limited and/or fragmented cases. The following priority list can be followed for origin destination data: 1. Region to region 2. Region to country 3. Country to country In the topdown approach of the NEAC model country to country data has been used from the COMEXT database since this is consistent for all EU countries. Region to country trade data from national sources is then used to include the regional detail. The following sources are considered: · EUROSTAT COMEXT · National trade data for all core countries · UN trade data 5.2.2 Transport data Transport data can be used for different purposes in the topdown approach and should be collected for all modes. All other variables mentioned under the trade flows should also be considered here as much as possible. The first distinction to be made is: · International transport · Domestic transport · Container or Loading units flows 32 Document2 27 May 2004
D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY AND DATABASE USER MANUAL – FREIGHT TRANSPORT DEMAND If trade data is available but excluding regional detail then regional international transport information can be used to estimate the regional detail. Here the following priority list can be used: 1. Region to region 2. Region to country 3. Country to country International transport data without regional detail are not of use for a topdown database construction approach. Only in case of a database estimation procedure aggregated international transport data can be very useful. This has to be considered in case no other data can be found. Domestic transport data has the following priority list: 1. Region to region 2. Region incoming and region outgoing 3. Country total The following transport data sources are considered: · EUROSTAT New Cronos · National transport data sources 5.2.3 Maritime transhipment data This type of transhipment information is best known for the major ports or port countries in Europe. For these ports very reliable and complete information used to be available. After 1992 the availability and quality of this type of data has decreased or the data are not available anymore (information about ports and modes have become optional for intraEU flows in the Intrastat system). For other ports in the EU availability of data has always been limited. It has to be attempted to find alternative useful sources to fill this data gap. Currently Eurostat collects porttoport data from the Member States according to the Maritime Directive (see ”Council directive 95/64/EC of 8 December 1995 on statistical returns in respect of carriage of goods and passengers by sea”). By the end of the testing method, a request has been made to EUROSTAT by DGTREN to make the data available for the construction of the ETIS reference database. The data have not been received yet at moment of writing. When the data becomes available, it will be used in the methods. This data contains no information about transhipment, but it does contain information about goods loaded and unloaded in ports in relation with partner ports. The following maritime transhipment data sources are considered: · National transhipment data sources · Ports Document2 27 May 2004 33
- Page 1: D5 Annex report WP 3: ETIS Databa
- Page 4 and 5: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 7: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 10 and 11: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 12 and 13: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 14 and 15: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 16 and 17: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 19 and 20: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 21 and 22: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 23 and 24: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 25 and 26: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 27 and 28: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 29: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 34 and 35: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 36 and 37: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 38 and 39: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 40 and 41: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 43 and 44: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 45 and 46: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 47 and 48: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 49 and 50: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 51 and 52: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 53 and 54: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 55 and 56: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 57 and 58: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 59 and 60: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 61 and 62: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 63 and 64: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 65 and 66: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 67: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 71 and 72: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 73 and 74: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 75: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 79 and 80: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
- Page 81 and 82: D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY
<strong>D5</strong> <strong>Annex</strong> <strong>WP</strong> 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY AND DATABASE USER MANUAL –<br />
FREIGHT TRANSPORT DEMAND<br />
· Destination (region, country)<br />
· Commodities,<br />
· Modes (at the national border, EU border, at origin, at destination?),<br />
· Containerisation,<br />
· Weight<br />
· Value<br />
· Route information:<br />
• border crossing<br />
• transhipment sea ports<br />
• transhipment other terminal(s)<br />
These variables should be collected in as much detail as possible. The ideal situation would be<br />
that all information needed to describe transport would be available from the trade registrations.<br />
Unfortunately this is not expected to be found. It should be attempted to come as close as<br />
possible to the ideal situation. Elements like region to region information or transhipment<br />
locations are unfortunately only available in very limited and/or fragmented cases.<br />
The following priority list can be followed for origin destination data:<br />
1. Region to region<br />
2. Region to country<br />
3. Country to country<br />
In the topdown approach of the NEAC model country to country data has been used from the<br />
COMEXT database since this is consistent for all EU countries. Region to country trade data<br />
from national sources is then used to include the regional detail.<br />
The following sources are considered:<br />
· EUROSTAT COMEXT<br />
· National trade data for all core countries<br />
· UN trade data<br />
5.2.2 Transport data<br />
Transport data can be used for different purposes in the topdown approach and should be<br />
collected for all modes. All other variables mentioned under the trade flows should also be<br />
considered here as much as possible. The first distinction to be made is:<br />
· International transport<br />
· Domestic transport<br />
· Container or Loading units flows<br />
32<br />
Document2<br />
27 May 2004
Change language